Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PAHAM MODERNISASI TERHADAP ASUMSI TEORITIS INDIVIDUALISME DALAM AKUNTANSI SOSIAL Zulaeha, Sitti; Alimuddin, Alimuddin; Habbe, Abdul Hamid; Mediaty, Mediaty
Bongaya Journal of Research in Accounting (BJRA) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020): Bongaya Journal of Research in Accounting
Publisher : STIEM BONGAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37888/bjra.v3i1.210

Abstract

This article uses a qualitative method, which aims to understand the phenomenon of research subjects by exploring the meaning of individuals or groups on the problem of modernization understanding of the theoretical assumptions of individualism in social accounting. Using the approach of the Hofstede Dimension Paradigm (1980), which identifies "cultural patterns or dimensions that influence people's behavior in significant ways" (Arasaratnam, 2011, p. 45). Several studies have begun to pay attention to the influence of interactions between culture, politics, and the national economy with the process of changing accounting practices in one country. Various studies are trying to uncover the relationship between national culture and organizational culture, with the disclosure of corporate accounting as in Gray, 1988; Perera, 1989; Gibbins et al, 1990 (Sudarwan, 1994). And Hofstede's cultural value dimension is widely used in several fields such as accounting management, auditing, financial accounting, and accounting standards (Noravesh, et al 2007). But, continued Noravesh, et al. (2007), these studies only develop theoretical views and do not develop empirical and systematic research on cultural relations and accounting. So it can be said that there is only the understanding of individualism in social accounting. Because of the culture of a group of people who consider themselves only individualism and not collectivism.
The Influence of Fraud Hexagon Theory on Detecting Fraudulent Factors in Financial Reports of State-Owned Companies Listed on the IDX 2018-2022 Aulia, Dina; Masrullah; Zulaeha, Sitti
Jurnal Penelitian IPTEKS Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL PENELITIAN IPTEKS
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32528/penelitianipteks.v9i1.1496

Abstract

Financial statement fraud is a paradigm that often occurs in Indonesia and causes many losses. Therefore, the aim of this research is to detect the emergence of potential fraud in financial reports using the hexagon fraud theory. In the hexagon fraud theory, there are six dominant factors that can trigger fraud in financial reports: pressure, opportunity, rationalization, ability, arrogance, and collusion. Pressure is proxied by financial targets, financial stability, and financial need; opportunity is proxied by the nature of industry and ineffective monitoring; rationalization is proxied by a change auditor as a proxy for capability to become and change in director; arrogance is proxied by political connections and the frequent number of CEOs; and collusion is proxied by projects with the government. In this research, the dependent variable is measured using the Jones model. The purposeful sampling technique was used in this research in order to obtain a population sample with the criteria of state-owned companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the last 5 years, namely, 2018–2022. The quantitative method is supported by multiple regression analysis techniques using the SPSS 26 analysis tool in this research. The results of this research show that the variables financial target, financial stability, personal financial need, nature of industry, ineffective monitoring, change in auditor, change in directors, and political connection have no influence on the potential for fraudulent financial statements. Frequent CEO pictures and collaboration projects with the government have a positive and significant effect on the potential for fraudulent financial statements