Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal Yustitia
Hamja
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
TINDAK PIDANA CYBERBULLYING BERDASARKAN UNDANG -UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2008 DIKAITKAN DENGAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 68/PID.PRAP/2015/PN.JKT.SEL Hamja
Yustitia Vol 5 No 2 (2019): Yustitia
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/yustitia.v5i2.94

Abstract

Cyber ​​bullying is one form of intimidation by someone, and discrediting others through the cyber world bullying. The consequence of the cyber bullying is not arbitrary. Sometimes, death becomes the end of cyber bullying. The characteristics of activities in the cyber world that are cross-border and no longer obey the boundaries of traditional law require responsive law. This is because certain articles in the criminal code are considered inadequate to answer legal issues that arise due to activities in the cyber world. Article of the criminal code that is relevant to cyber bullying is article 310 and article 311 of the criminal code. The research method used in this study is a normative juridical approach with data collection techniques in the study of literature both primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The purpose of this study is to find out the provisions of criminal acts against cyber bullying regulated in article 310 of the criminal code, and how criminal sanctions against cyber bullying in decision Number 68/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkr.Sel. In this study, it could be concluded that the provisions of criminal acts in the world of cyber bullying are hostile acts carried out consciously and intentionally that aim to hurt, such as frightening through the threat of aggression and causing terror. It includes planned or spontaneous actions that are real or invisible, in front of someone or behind someone, easy to be identified or hidden behind friendship, carried out by a child or a group of children. Because the perpetrators of cyber bullying are also anonymous accounts whose truth of identity is difficult to find, even though the victim has reported the perpetrator's account for his actions, but the process of finding the identity of the perpetrator is quite time consuming.
TINDAK PIDANA CYBERBULLYING BERDASARKAN UNDANG -UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2008 DIKAITKAN DENGAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 68/PID.PRAP/2015/PN.JKT.SEL Hamja
Yustitia Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): Yustitia
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/yustitia.v5i2.94

Abstract

Cyber ​​bullying is one form of intimidation by someone, and discrediting others through the cyber world bullying. The consequence of the cyber bullying is not arbitrary. Sometimes, death becomes the end of cyber bullying. The characteristics of activities in the cyber world that are cross-border and no longer obey the boundaries of traditional law require responsive law. This is because certain articles in the criminal code are considered inadequate to answer legal issues that arise due to activities in the cyber world. Article of the criminal code that is relevant to cyber bullying is article 310 and article 311 of the criminal code. The research method used in this study is a normative juridical approach with data collection techniques in the study of literature both primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The purpose of this study is to find out the provisions of criminal acts against cyber bullying regulated in article 310 of the criminal code, and how criminal sanctions against cyber bullying in decision Number 68/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkr.Sel. In this study, it could be concluded that the provisions of criminal acts in the world of cyber bullying are hostile acts carried out consciously and intentionally that aim to hurt, such as frightening through the threat of aggression and causing terror. It includes planned or spontaneous actions that are real or invisible, in front of someone or behind someone, easy to be identified or hidden behind friendship, carried out by a child or a group of children. Because the perpetrators of cyber bullying are also anonymous accounts whose truth of identity is difficult to find, even though the victim has reported the perpetrator's account for his actions, but the process of finding the identity of the perpetrator is quite time consuming.
Community-Based Correction Implementation Analysis (Global Survey) hamja; Al Ghifari, Bintang Azhar
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 002 (2024): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5518

Abstract

Community-based corrections has become an alternative approach in the criminal justice system to address the challenges arising from the conventional incarceration approach. This approach not only aims to rehabilitate offenders through social integration, but also reduces recidivism rates and prison overcrowding. However, its implementation faces various obstacles, including complex legal issues, such as differences in regulatory interpretation, policy gaps between countries, and limited legal resources. This study aims to analyze the implementation of community-based corrections from a legal perspective using a global survey. The research methodology includes data collection from various countries to identify legal challenges, best practices, and innovations in the community-based corrections system. The results show that the success of the implementation of this approach is greatly influenced by the existing legal framework, policy support, and community engagement. This abstract provides insight into the importance of a holistic approach involving updating the legal framework, improving coordination between institutions, and strengthening community capacity to support the sustainability of community-based corrections. This global survey also recommends more inclusive and adaptive policies to address differences in legal contexts across jurisdictions.
Co-Authors Al Ghifari, Bintang Azhar