This Author published in this journals
All Journal Vyavahara Duta
Tagel, Dewa Putu
Jurusan Hukum Fakultas Darma Duta IHDN Denpasar

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

KONSEKUENSI YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 13/PUU-XV/2017 TERHADAP TENAGA KERJA YANG MEMILIKI IKATAN PERKAWINAN DENGAN SESAMA TENAGA KERJA DALAM SATU PERUSAHAAN Trisnadiasa, I Nyoman Agus; Tagel, Dewa Putu
VYAVAHARA DUTA Vol 14, No 1 (2019): MARET 2019
Publisher : Institut Hindu Dharma Negeri Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (203.353 KB)

Abstract

The Problems that emerged in a marriage in Indonesia, visible seen in arrangement marriage in tje workplace, each worker / laborers in one company will undertake ongoing marriage, some companies both by the governmenr, and private, establishes a clause that limits the right to undertake ongoing marriage between workers/laborers in one company. That the existence of a clause the termination of employment, so that constitutional court thought the regulation contraty contrary constitutional the art 28D paragraph 1 the contitution of 1945 that everyone is entitled to form family and to survive through marriage legitimate. Expected forcompany follow the constitutional court decisions.
KONSEKUENSI YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 13/PUU-XV/2017 TERHADAP TENAGA KERJA YANG MEMILIKI IKATAN PERKAWINAN DENGAN SESAMA TENAGA KERJA DALAM SATU PERUSAHAAN Trisnadiasa, I Nyoman Agus; Tagel, Dewa Putu
VYAVAHARA DUTA Vol 14, No 1 (2019): MARET 2019
Publisher : Institut Hindu Dharma Negeri Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25078/vd.v14i1.1101

Abstract

The Problems that emerged in a marriage in Indonesia, visible seen in arrangement marriage in tje workplace, each worker / laborers in one company will undertake ongoing marriage, some companies both by the governmenr, and private, establishes a clause that limits the right to undertake ongoing marriage between workers/laborers in one company. That the existence of a clause the termination of employment, so that constitutional court thought the regulation contraty contrary constitutional the art 28D paragraph 1 the contitution of 1945 that everyone is entitled to form family and to survive through marriage legitimate. Expected forcompany follow the constitutional court decisions.