Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Veritas et Justitia Warkat
Riskawati, Shanti
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Hambatan Pelaksanaan Hasil Mediasi Antara Pengembang Perumahan Di Yogyakarta Dan Konsumen: Hindrance To Implementation Of The Results Of The Mediation Between Housing Developer And Consumers Salsabila, Shindy Nabila; Sulistyarini, Rachmi; Riskawati, Shanti
Warkat Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Juni
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/warkat.v3n1.1

Abstract

This research studies the hindrance to the implementation of the result of mediation between a housing developer and consumers facilitated by the Ombudsman of the Special Region of Yogyakarta. This case has been handled by the ombudsman since early 2019, while the agreement outlined in the memorandum of understanding fails to be implemented. Article 6 paragraph (6) and Article 6 Paragraph (7) of Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Dispute Resolution Arbitration and Alternative (UU APS) has set a provision implying that mediation is implemented within 30 days, and this provision is outlined in a written agreement which is binding and final to all parties who are required to enforce this provision with good faith. This mediation is to be registered to a local District Court. However, there are two impeding factors such as procedural and substantive matters. The procedural matters are related to the absence of the basis of the law that states that the ombudsman complies with UU APS regarding the mediation. On the other hand, substantive factors are triggered by insufficient funds owned by the developer, the dominant bargaining position possessed by a consumer, and lack of understanding of the parties involved in the dispute regarding the legal principles and limited role of mediators.
PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2015 TENTANG TATA CARA PENYELESAIAN GUGATAN SEDERHANA SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN PERWUJUDAN ASAS PERADILAN SEDERHANA, CEPAT DAN BIAYA RINGAN Riskawati, Shanti
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v4i1.2917

Abstract

There is a need to conduct business transactions rapidly and in a quick perfunctory manner.  At the same time arose also the need to develop and implement a quick, simple and cost efficient business dispute settlement procedure.  In response to this need, the Indonesian Supreme Court issued regulation no. 2 of 2015 re. procedure for filing simple civil claims. The legal issue to be discussed here, using a juridical normative or dogmatic approach, is whether this regulation succeed in fulfilling its promise to provide for a quick, simple and cost efficient civil claim examination procedure? The answer to this question is sought, in addition to the method mentioned above, by comparing the procedure provided by the Supreme Court regulation with the existing model of civil claim court examination procedure.  By virtue of this comparison the strength and weakness of the Supreme Court dispute settlement model can be analyzed.
Co-Authors Rachmi Sulistyarini Salsabila, Shindy Nabila