Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JISPO (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik) Jurnal Bina Praja Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Sosial
Rosanti, Ratna
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Masa Depan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 55/PUU-XVII/2019 Rosanti, Ratna
JISPO Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol. 10 No. 1 (2020): Vol. 10 No. 1 2020 | JISPO Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Publisher : Faculty of SociaI and Political Sciences (FISIP), Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jispo.v10i1.7966

Abstract

Dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis-normatif yang dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan, terutama kritik wacana publik dengan mengontekstualisasikan realitas sosiologis-politik, artikel ini menganalisis masa depan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Pilkada) di Indonesia pasca Mahkamah Konstitusi mengucapkan putusan terhadap pengujian undang-undang terkait regularitas pemilu serentak  pada 26 Februari 2020. Dalam Putusan Nomor 55/PUU-XVII/2019, Mahkamah menolak apa yang diminta oleh pemohon. Namun, dalam pertimbangan hukumnya, Mahkamah memberikan fondasi dan batasan yang sangat kuat terhadap sistem penyelenggaraan pemilu serentak ke depan, yaitu enam gagasan inovasi terkait formula ideal penyelenggaraan pemilu serentak Indonesia di masa datang. Satu di antara gagasan tersebut adalah pemilihan umum serentak dilaksanakan sesuai dengan berakhirnya masa jabatan yang akan dipilih sehingga arti dari serentak ini adalah bahwa pemilihan dapat dilakukan beberapa kali dalam durasi lima tahun termasuk dalam hal pemilihan gubernur, bupati dan wali kota. Berdasarkan ini, artikel ini berargumen bahwa keputusan tersebut mengakibatkan Pilkada menjadi bagian dari Pemilihan Umum sehingga tiada pembedaan lagi antara pilkada dan pemilu karena desain keserentakan telah membarengkan Pemilihan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden, Pemilihan Legislatif dan Pilkada.Using a juridical-normative approach, this article analyzes the future of the Regional Head Election in Indonesia after the Constitutional Court pronounced the verdict on the judicial review of the law on Simultaneous Election on February 26, 2020. In Decision Number 55 / PUU-XVII / 2019, the Court did reject what was requested by the applicant. However, in its legal considerations, the Court suggests six innovative ideas as foundation, ideal formula, and boundaries of a better implementation of the simultaneous election system in the future. One key thing of such ideas is that the simultaneous general election is held following the end of an office term so that regional head election can be conducted several times in five years including the election of governors, regents, and mayors. Based on this, this article argues that the above court ruling has a significant impact in that it causes the Regional Head Election to be part of the National General Election. Therefore, there is no longer a distinction between the Regional Head Election and Indonesian General Election because the simultaneous election system puts three elections at the same time: presidential, legislative, and regional head elections.
PANDEMIC AT THE POLLS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE DECISION TO CONTINUE THE 2020 REGIONAL HEAD ELECTION IN THE NEW NORMAL ERA Rosanti, Ratna
Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Sosial Vol 4 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38043/jids.v4i2.2499

Abstract

This article will specifically provide a preliminary assessment of the many risks that the Covid-19 pandemic might pose if elections continue to be held and it is not impossible that elections continued during the pandemic will be far from being fair, honest and transparent even endangering the security and safety of voters at the Polling Stations. The emergence of a new era during the pandemic called New Normal where everyone must behave new in everyday life by prioritizing aspects of health will certainly have a significant influence in the implementation of elections. The method used is the study of literature. The literature used in this study includes all literature, news coverage and reports relating to the holding of the elections including previous books and articles that discuss the holding of elections during a pandemic. This paper begins by explaining why elections are an important part of democracy, and then looks at how the government's response to the pandemic and elections that will be held in the New Normal era will present significant solutions about the future of democracy itself. In this paper, the author also recommends several things related to the holding of elections during the pandemic. The main findings of this paper are: First, the presence of the virus itself can directly prevent voters from casting their votes at the polling stations and even affect the overall level of voter participation. Second, there are consequences of formally delaying the holding of elections which vary by type of regime (national or local). Third, some elements in the electoral cycle can be affected by the pandemic.
Pragmatisme Politik di Indonesia: Kandidat, Koalisi Partai Politik dan Calon Tunggal dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah: Candidates, the Coalition of Political Parties and Single Candidate for Local Elections Rosanti, Ratna
Jurnal Bina Praja Vol 12 No 2 (2020): Pemilihan Kepala Daerah
Publisher : Research and Development Agency Ministry of Home Affairs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21787/jbp.12.2020.153-165

Abstract

Political pragmatics has become its dynamic in Local Elections. The existence of incumbent power and uneven coalition formation of parties in the election can directly reduce or eliminate the opportunity for other political parties to participate in the election. In addition to these problems, so far, candidates' nomination by political parties turns out to pay more attention to the incumbent electability or popularity of the candidates to be carried by them and without assuming to party ideology. This certainly makes the power imbalance so that candidates from political parties or coalitions of other political parties are reluctant to compete. Political parties hold a coalition to carry out the candidates for various reasons. This research article will explain political parties' pragmatics in forming a coalition and carrying a pair of candidates that gave rise to a single candidate's phenomenon. The research article begins with collecting data through a literature study and is supported by the General Elections Commission's data. To answer this phenomenon, the writer analyzes the documentation as long as the Local Elections is held simultaneously. The concept of political pragmatism is expected to explain these phenomena. This paper concludes that the pragmatic methods used by political parties in determining coalitions and candidates in the Regional Head Election are because the purpose of political parties to participate in the contestation is only a victory to gain power.
Co-Authors