Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Rekonstruksi Rekrutmen Dan Pengawasan Eksternal Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Dengan Pendekatan Hukum Progresif Fauzanto, Adi
Jurnal Panorama Hukum Vol 5 No 1 (2020): Juni
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang

Indonesia is a country of law. Jimly Asshiddiqie formulated twelve main principles of modern rule of law, one of which was the existence of a free and impartial judiciary, and the existence of a constitutional justice mechanism. After amendments of the constitution of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, it has implications for the structure of more democratic state institutions. These changes give birth to the building of state relief from one another in an equal position with mutual control (checks and balances). Judicial Power is an independent power to administer justice to uphold law and justice. An independent judicial power or what is referred to as the principle of independence cannot be separated from the principle of checks and balances adopted by Indonesia to ensure that the institutions of authority and duties are balanced and the principles of the state are based on law and constitution. In Indonesia, the Constitutional Court judiciary was born on August 13, 2003, which was formed based on Law Number 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court. The history of the establishment of the Constitutional Court (MK) began with the adoption of the idea of a Constitutional Court in constitutional amendments. In the course of normative juridical arrangements regarding the Constitutional Court, there have been four amendments, namely (1) Law Number 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court; (2) Law Number 8 of 2011 concerning Amendment of Law Number 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court; and (3) Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2013 concerning Second Amendment to Law Number 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court which has been ratified into law with Law Number 4 of 2014 and has been cancelled by MK Decision Number 1-2 / PUU-XII / 2014. This is due to several problems faced by the Constitutional Court, namely Constitutional Court Judges who violated the code of ethics to commit corruption and bribery. Of course, there is a need for a comprehensive study relating to (1) Appointment of Constitutional Justices and Panel of Experts and (2) External Oversight of Constitutional Justices and the Ethics Board of Constitutional Justices. use the Progressive Legal Theory approach to get solutions to the problematics that occur, which explore the values contained in society. In its arrangement, the Expert Panel and External Oversight have been regulated in Perppu No. 1 of 2013 which has been stipulated as Law Number 4 of 2014, but in that Act, the Court considers that the Expert Panel and External Oversight Committee formed by the Judicial Commission is considered unconstitutional because there is no principle of checks and balances within the judicial authority. With the susceptibility of constitutional judges to take actions outside of authority and other factors that have implications for the declining level of the Constitutional Court's confidence in society. Therefore, the researcher here wants to reconstruct a Panel of Experts and External Supervisors who answer the previous problems. The purpose of the Reconstruction of Panel of Experts and External Oversight is to realize a law enforcement system that is free of corruption, collusion, nepotism.

Analisis Pola dan Pencegahan Korupsi Legislasi di Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) pada Pembentukan Undang-Undang Fauzanto, Adi
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 19, No 2 (2022): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Volume 19 Nomor 2 - Juni 2022
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v19i2.848

Abstract Study about the problems of legislative corruption, direct the urgency of the existence of a state of law that requires the existence of laws and also the legislative institutions that form them. The latest problem regarding the study of law formation is State Capture, where institutions outside the law-making institution try to influence the substance of the regulation in accordance with the interests of that institution. The method to influence it is to bribe law-forming actors. In the study, an analysis of case studies of revisions and the formation of laws is carried out on the process of forming laws such as planning, drafting, discussing and ratifying, enactment with the principles of law formation. To prevent this, the incident of state capture is explained by the existence of a conflict of interest, resulting in the emergence of an enclosed discussion to making the law. Then look for a formula to prevent it by establishing a norm approach through formal institution supervision, public supervision, expert supervision, and supervision of related institutions, then a knowledge approach through public information about background legislators and related institutions, and systems approach through a whistleblowing system in the formation of laws. AbstrakPembahasan mengenai problematika korupsi legislasi, mengantarkan urgensi adanya bentuk negara hukum yang menysaratkan adanya undang-undang dan juga lembaga legislatif yang membentuknya. Permasalahan terbaru mengenai kajian pembentukan undang-undang merupakan State Capture, dimana pihak diluar lembaga pembentukan undang-undang berusaha mempengaruhi substansi peraturan sesuai dengan kepentingan pihak tersebut. Cara mempengaruhinya dengan melakukan suap kepada aktor-aktor pembentuk undang-undang. Dalam pembahasan dilakukan analisa studi kasus revisi dan pembentukan Undang-Undang terhadap proses pembentukan undang-undang seperti perencanaan, penyusunan, pembahasan dan pengesahan, pengundangan dengan prinsip-prinsip pembentukan undang-undang. Untuk mencegahnya, peristiwa state capture dijelaskan dengan adanya konflik kepentingan, sehingga munculnya ruang pembahasan tertutup undang-undang. Kemudian dicari formula mencegahnya dengan membentuk pendekatan norma melalui pengawasan instansi formal, pengawasan publik, pengawasan ahli, serta pengawasan pihak terkait, selanjutnya pendekatan pengetahuan melalui informasi publik latar belakang pembentuk undang-undang serta pihak terkait, dan pendekatan sistem melalui whistleblowing system pada pembentukan undang-undang.

Peran Muhammadiyah dan Nahdlatul Ulama dalam Problematika Kerusakan Lingkungan Hidup di Indonesia Fauzanto, Adi
MOMENTUM : Jurnal Sosial dan Keagamaan Vol 9 No 1 (2020): MUMENTUM MEI 2020
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LPPM) Sekolah Tinggi Islam Blambangan (STIB) Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

The outline of environmental problems is divided into two, namely environmental pollution and environmental damage. These problems, both pollution and damage, certainly need to be overcome to realize sustainable development. There are four principles for realizing sustainable development, one of which is the opportunity for self-determination which includes community participation in a democratic system. Community participation must have a forum to accommodate aspirations that are not oriented to the interests of power, and economic interests, such institutions are community organizations. As Islamic community organizations in Indonesia, namely Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama. This study uses a qualitative data comparison approach between the two research objects and produces descriptive data relating to the role and methods of the Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama organizations in the problem of pollution and environmental damage in Indonesia. The results and discussion are both having roles and methods in dealing with environmental pollution and damage in the fields of law, education, advocacy, and literacy

PROBLEMATIKA OLIGARKI, KORUPSI, DAN RELASI KUASA DALAM BATU BARA DAN PEMBANGKIT LISTRIK TENAGA UAP Fauzanto, Adi
Jurnal Ilmiah Muqoddimah: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hummaniora Vol 5, No 1 (2021): Pebruari 2021
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/jim.v5i1.2021.95-103

Kerusakan lingkungan semakin terasa dampaknya, tetapi di balik kerusakan lingkungan tersebut, terdapat penyebab dan tidak bisa terjadi begitu saja. Oligarki, korupsi, dan hubungan kekuasaan para aktor di dalamnya adalah faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan kerusakan lingkungan, khususnya di pertambangan batu bara dan Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Uap (PLTU). Menarik untuk membahas ketiganya, dan menjadi metode untuk mengidentifikasi kerusakan lingkungan yang terjadi. Oleh karena itu, penulis membahas ketiganya dengan pendekatan teori oligarki oleh Jeffry Winters, korupsi politik oleh Altidjo Alkostar, dan hubungan kekuasaan aktor oleh Bryant dan Bailey. Dilingkup pembahasan oligarki, penulis menjelaskan pengertian oligarki dan melacak oligark dengan cara mengidentifikasi cara kerja nya. Di pembahasan korupsi, penulis menjelaskan studi kasus korupsi PLTU Riau-1 yang merujuk kepada korupsi politik dan ancaman korupsi batu bara berdasarkan kajian Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW). Di pembahasan relasi kuasa, penulis menjelaskan aktor-aktor yang terlibat berserta peran nya dalam kerusakan lingkungan, dan menjadikan metode untuk mengidentifikasi kerusakan lingkungan. Ketiga kajian tersebut (oligarki; korupsi; relasi kuasa) diperlukan dalam mengatasi problematika kerusakan lingkungan yang terjadi khususnya pada sektor pertambangan batu bara dan PLTU.Kata kunci: Batu Bara, Korupsi, Oligarki, PLTU, Relasi Kuasa

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 4 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search