Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

REINTERPRETASI HADIS PENAKLUKAN KONSTANTINOPEL PERSPEKTIF FAZLUR RAHMAN Paizin, Harel Bayu
Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis Vol 3 No 1 (2020): Januari - Juni 2020 M / 1441 H
Publisher : Department of Hadis Sciences (IH), Faculty of Usuluddin, Adab, and Da'wah (FUAD), State Islamic Institute of Langsa (IAIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/al-bukhari.v3i1.1507

Abstract

This paper discusses the criticism conveyed by Rahman on the understanding of hadith that has been developed in the midst of Islamic societies regarding the hadith about the conquest of Constantinople, where so far the hadith about the conquest of Constantinople is believed to be the main driver of Islamic commanders to conquer Constantinople. But Fazlur Rahman denied it by stating that the hadith was a hadith that emerge during the period of defamation which was used by certain groups to support their ambitions. To support his suspicion, Rahman offers a methodology called the theory of historicity, where each hadith must be seen first in terms of the history that follows it. The results obtained from the hadith about the conquest caused a shift in understanding that had been believed by Muslims that the conquest of Constantinople was inspired by the hadith that was revealed by the Prophet Muhammad.
Hate Speech and Social Disintegration: A Normative Response to the Hadith in the Hermeneutical Study of Muhammad Al-Ghazali Paizin, Harel Bayu; HD, Ahmad Tri Muslim; Alimin, Muh; Ilyas, Syamsul Ma'arif
Jurnal El-Thawalib Vol 6, No 4 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-thawalib.v6i4.16970

Abstract

The phenomenon of hate speech has become a global epidemic in the digital era, spreading at an extraordinary speed through social media platforms such as Facebook, X, WhatsApp, TikTok, and Instagram. This is a crucial problem that requires a solution to prevent social disintegration in society. The purpose of this article is to identify and examine the normative relevance of hadith as an ethical and practical response to hate speech through the hermeneutics of Muhammad al-Ghazali's hadith. This type of research is qualitative with a phenomenological analysis approach. Primary data sources come from hadith books and secondary data from related journals and books. Data were collected through observation and document study techniques and analyzed using content analysis techniques. The results of this study indicate that al-Ghazali did not view hadith merely as literal texts, but rather as social ethical doctrines oriented towards the goals of sharia, namely maintaining the welfare of the community. His hermeneutics places hadith as a normative foundation that firmly rejects hate speech, because it is considered contrary to the basic principles of Islam such as unity, justice, and human dignity.
Hate Speech and Social Disintegration: A Normative Response to the Hadith in the Hermeneutical Study of Muhammad Al-Ghazali Paizin, Harel Bayu; HD, Ahmad Tri Muslim; Alimin, Muh; Ilyas, Syamsul Ma'arif
Jurnal El-Thawalib Vol 6, No 4 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-thawalib.v6i4.16970

Abstract

The phenomenon of hate speech has become a global epidemic in the digital era, spreading at an extraordinary speed through social media platforms such as Facebook, X, WhatsApp, TikTok, and Instagram. This is a crucial problem that requires a solution to prevent social disintegration in society. The purpose of this article is to identify and examine the normative relevance of hadith as an ethical and practical response to hate speech through the hermeneutics of Muhammad al-Ghazali's hadith. This type of research is qualitative with a phenomenological analysis approach. Primary data sources come from hadith books and secondary data from related journals and books. Data were collected through observation and document study techniques and analyzed using content analysis techniques. The results of this study indicate that al-Ghazali did not view hadith merely as literal texts, but rather as social ethical doctrines oriented towards the goals of sharia, namely maintaining the welfare of the community. His hermeneutics places hadith as a normative foundation that firmly rejects hate speech, because it is considered contrary to the basic principles of Islam such as unity, justice, and human dignity.
Reconstruction Of The Understanding Of Polygamy In Islam: Analysis Of Nasaruddin Umar's Hermeneutics Of Gender Justice Nurramadhani, Fatimah Azzahra; Paizin, Harel Bayu
Jurnal El-Thawalib Vol 6, No 6 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-thawalib.v6i6.17931

Abstract

Polygamy is an Islamic family law issue that continues to be debated, especially when its practice in modern Muslim societies often leads to gender inequality. Although it has a normative basis in the Qur'an, specifically QS. al-Nisā' [4]: 3 and QS. al-Nisā' [4]: 129, verses on polygamy are often understood textually as legal justification, without considering the historical context and ethical objectives. As a result, there is a gap between the moral message of the Qur'an, which emphasizes justice and benefit, and the social reality of polygamy, which is fraught with gender inequality. This study aims to reconstruct the understanding of polygamy in Islam through an analysis of Nasaruddin Umar's hermeneutics of gender justice, as well as to examine the contribution of his thoughts in bridging the gap between the text of the Qur'an and social practice. This research is a library-based qualitative study. Primary data were obtained from the Qur'an and the works of Nasaruddin Umar. Secondary sources include academic books, journal articles, and previous research relevant to the theme of polygamy and gender interpretation. Data collection techniques. Data collection was carried out through systematic literature searches in both physical libraries and electronic databases, and the data were analyzed using descriptive-qualitative methods and hermeneutic analysis, considering the historical, social context, and moral objectives of religious texts. The results of the study show that Nasaruddin Umar interprets the verses on polygamy as contextual and preventive social regulations, not as an ideal marriage institution. Justice in polygamy is understood not only in material terms, but also encompasses emotional and psychological dimensions that are theologically difficult for humans to achieve. Therefore, polygamy is positioned as a very strict conditional permission, while monogamy is considered more in line with the objectives of Sharia law, namely justice, protection of human dignity, and family welfare. This study contributes to the development of Qur'anic exegesis and gender studies by emphasizing the importance of a hermeneutic approach oriented towards substantive justice in understanding the verses on polygamy, thereby producing a more humanistic, proportional, and relevant understanding in the context of contemporary Muslim society.
Reconstruction Of The Understanding Of Polygamy In Islam: Analysis Of Nasaruddin Umar's Hermeneutics Of Gender Justice Nurramadhani, Fatimah Azzahra; Paizin, Harel Bayu
Jurnal El-Thawalib Vol 6, No 6 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-thawalib.v6i6.17931

Abstract

Polygamy is an Islamic family law issue that continues to be debated, especially when its practice in modern Muslim societies often leads to gender inequality. Although it has a normative basis in the Qur'an, specifically QS. al-Nisā' [4]: 3 and QS. al-Nisā' [4]: 129, verses on polygamy are often understood textually as legal justification, without considering the historical context and ethical objectives. As a result, there is a gap between the moral message of the Qur'an, which emphasizes justice and benefit, and the social reality of polygamy, which is fraught with gender inequality. This study aims to reconstruct the understanding of polygamy in Islam through an analysis of Nasaruddin Umar's hermeneutics of gender justice, as well as to examine the contribution of his thoughts in bridging the gap between the text of the Qur'an and social practice. This research is a library-based qualitative study. Primary data were obtained from the Qur'an and the works of Nasaruddin Umar. Secondary sources include academic books, journal articles, and previous research relevant to the theme of polygamy and gender interpretation. Data collection techniques. Data collection was carried out through systematic literature searches in both physical libraries and electronic databases, and the data were analyzed using descriptive-qualitative methods and hermeneutic analysis, considering the historical, social context, and moral objectives of religious texts. The results of the study show that Nasaruddin Umar interprets the verses on polygamy as contextual and preventive social regulations, not as an ideal marriage institution. Justice in polygamy is understood not only in material terms, but also encompasses emotional and psychological dimensions that are theologically difficult for humans to achieve. Therefore, polygamy is positioned as a very strict conditional permission, while monogamy is considered more in line with the objectives of Sharia law, namely justice, protection of human dignity, and family welfare. This study contributes to the development of Qur'anic exegesis and gender studies by emphasizing the importance of a hermeneutic approach oriented towards substantive justice in understanding the verses on polygamy, thereby producing a more humanistic, proportional, and relevant understanding in the context of contemporary Muslim society.