Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION POLICY IN IMPROVING THE REGIONAL ECONOMY: A SPATIAL ECONOMETRIC APPROACH Yusuf, Nurjannah -
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 24, No 1 (2020): May
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.54803

Abstract

Indonesia faced the problem of economic inequality and a low level of per capita income, especially in areas producing mining goods and quarries, which are a source of national income. Exports for these commodities do not affect increasing regional income per capita. This problem became a reason; decentralization is a political policy choice after the fall of the New Order in 1998, as a reform resulting in each region would have space to actualize its regional potential, both economically and politically. Nevertheless, after 20 years of implementation, decentralization, inequality, and poverty in the eastern region have not experienced much change. Also, the decentralized system, especially fiscal decentralization, actually burden of the central government financial, because the provinces are most dependent on central government funds. This study investigates why decentralization does not affect reducing poverty and how it should work. It was using a spatial approach to assess the regional economy for the period 2004-2015 with applied the spatial Durbin model (SDM) panel of data from 33 provinces in Indonesia. The results found that the level of provincial per capita income did not determine by initial income or the amount of transfer fund, but it is by imports and exports. While local revenue government is a source of transfer grant does not impact except much less for growth economic of regional.
FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION POLICY IN IMPROVING THE REGIONAL ECONOMY: A SPATIAL ECONOMETRIC APPROACH Nurjannah - Yusuf
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 24, No 1 (2020): May
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.54803

Abstract

Indonesia faced the problem of economic inequality and a low level of per capita income, especially in areas producing mining goods and quarries, which are a source of national income. Exports for these commodities do not affect increasing regional income per capita. This problem became a reason; decentralization is a political policy choice after the fall of the New Order in 1998, as a reform resulting in each region would have space to actualize its regional potential, both economically and politically. Nevertheless, after 20 years of implementation, decentralization, inequality, and poverty in the eastern region have not experienced much change. Also, the decentralized system, especially fiscal decentralization, actually burden of the central government financial, because the provinces are most dependent on central government funds. This study investigates why decentralization does not affect reducing poverty and how it should work. It was using a spatial approach to assess the regional economy for the period 2004-2015 with applied the spatial Durbin model (SDM) panel of data from 33 provinces in Indonesia. The results found that the level of provincial per capita income did not determine by initial income or the amount of transfer fund, but it is by imports and exports. While local revenue government is a source of transfer grant does not impact except much less for growth economic of regional.
FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION POLICY IN IMPROVING THE REGIONAL ECONOMY: A SPATIAL ECONOMETRIC APPROACH Nurjannah - Yusuf
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 24, No 1 (2020): May
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.54803

Abstract

Indonesia faced the problem of economic inequality and a low level of per capita income, especially in areas producing mining goods and quarries, which are a source of national income. Exports for these commodities do not affect increasing regional income per capita. This problem became a reason; decentralization is a political policy choice after the fall of the New Order in 1998, as a reform resulting in each region would have space to actualize its regional potential, both economically and politically. Nevertheless, after 20 years of implementation, decentralization, inequality, and poverty in the eastern region have not experienced much change. Also, the decentralized system, especially fiscal decentralization, actually burden of the central government financial, because the provinces are most dependent on central government funds. This study investigates why decentralization does not affect reducing poverty and how it should work. It was using a spatial approach to assess the regional economy for the period 2004-2015 with applied the spatial Durbin model (SDM) panel of data from 33 provinces in Indonesia. The results found that the level of provincial per capita income did not determine by initial income or the amount of transfer fund, but it is by imports and exports. While local revenue government is a source of transfer grant does not impact except much less for growth economic of regional.
Manajemen Kebijakan Fiskal dan Dampaknya terhadap Pembangunan Manusia di Negara Berkembang Kulsum, Umi; Yusuf , Nurjannah
Jurilma Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Juni 2025
Publisher : CV.RIZANIA MEDIA PRATAMA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69533/ceyf9087

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis hubungan antara pengeluaran pemerintah dan Indeks Pembangunan Manusia (IPM) di negara berkembang. Metode penelitian menggunakan analisis regresi berganda dengan data panel dari 15 negara berkembang periode 2015–2023. Variabel independen meliputi pengeluaran pemerintah untuk kesehatan, pendidikan, dan infrastruktur sebagai persentase dari PDB, sedangkan variabel dependen adalah IPM. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketiga sektor pengeluaran pemerintah tersebut berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap IPM. Setiap peningkatan 1% pengeluaran kesehatan meningkatkan IPM sebesar 0,031 poin, pengeluaran pendidikan sebesar 0,028 poin, dan pengeluaran infrastruktur sebesar 0,025 poin. Model penelitian menjelaskan 76% variasi IPM antarnegara. Temuan ini menegaskan pentingnya efektivitas manajemen kebijakan fiskal dalam memperkuat pembangunan manusia. Bagi pengambil keputusan publik, hasil penelitian ini dapat menjadi dasar perencanaan dan pengalokasian anggaran yang lebih strategis dan berbasis hasil (outcome-based budgeting). Pemerintah negara berkembang disarankan untuk mengelola belanja sektor kesehatan, pendidikan, dan infrastruktur secara terpadu guna memaksimalkan dampaknya terhadap kualitas hidup masyarakat dan pencapaian tujuan pembangunan berkelanjutan.