Nasyi’ah, Iffaty
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

IMPLEMENTASI PRINSIP SYARIAH TERHADAP PENYITAAN JAMINAN FIDUSIA Nasyi’ah, Iffaty; Chusna, Asna Jazillatul
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 4, No 2: Desember 2012
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (459.966 KB) | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v4i2.2984

Abstract

This research aims at comparing the foreclosure process of fiduciary collateral between Fiduciary regulation (Law N. 42 of 1999) and the principles of Shariah and the compatibility of the foreclosure process with the the principles of Shariah as well as consumer protection principles. This is a literary research (Bibliography Research), which uses the written data sources such as al-Quran and al-Hadith, relevant legislation. The research reveals that the foreclosure process of fiduciary collateral is based on Fiduciary Law, some procedures are in accordance with Islamic principles except in the case of delay of payment provided by the creditor to the debitor and the consent of the competent institutions in foreclosure cases to be performed . However, Adage „the privity of contract“ under consumer protection laws are not accommodated in the foreclosure process by Fiduciary Law. Creditors still use the standard contract that led to the dominance of the creditor against the debtor. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan proses penyitaan jaminan fidusia antara UU Jaminan Fidusia (UU Nomor 42 tahun 1999) dan prinsip-prinsip Syariah dan kesesuain proses  penyitaan  jaminan  sesuai  dengan  prinsip-prinsip  syariah  dan  prinsip-prinsip perlindungan konsumen. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kepustakaan (Bibliography Research), yang menggunakan sumber data tertulis seperti ; al-Qur’an dan al-Hadis dan perundang-undangan terkait.Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa pada proses penyitaan jaminan fidusia berdasarkan UU Jaminan Fidusia, beberapa prosedur telah sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip syariah kecuali dalam hal adanya penundaan pembayaran yang diberikan oleh pihak kreditur kepada debitur serta adanya ijin dari lembaga yang berwenang untuk dilakukan  penyitaan.  Adagium  the   privity  of  contract“  dalam  hukum perlindungan konsumen masih belum diakomodir secara menyeluruh dalam proses penyitaan menurut UU Jaminan Fidusia. Kreditur masih menggunakan perjanjian baku yang mengarah pada adanya  dominasi  pihak  kreditur  terhadap  debitur.  Penggunaan  prinsip-prinsip  syariah dalam proses penyitaan telah mengakomodir prinsip-prinsip penyitaan dalam UU Jaminan Fidusia sekaligus menurut UU Perlindungan Konsumen.
PELANGGARAN KEWAJIBAN PENDAFTARAN SERTIFIKAT HALAL: Dapatkah Dibuat Sanksi? Nasyi’ah, Iffaty
Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Jurisdictie: Vol. 9, No. 1 (2018)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j.v9i1.5137

Abstract

The number of businessmen who have not yet registered for halal certificate grabs government’s attention. This is reflected in the Article 4 about Halal Product Warranty (Jaminan Produk Halal/JPH). The infraction against that article has no juridical implication, either administratively or criminally. The inconsistency of this article encourages researcher to seek for answers on two issues: can the infraction of article 4 be judged? Which kind of sanction is appropriate as the juridical consequence of the aforementioned article? The article is a normative research and uses legislation and conceptual approaches. Using the individual-liberalistic and strafrecht’s ordenings theories, the researcher assumes that infraction against Article 4 of JPH Law is still possible. The reason is that this article does not have a particular status of infraction; either it is civil, administrative, or criminal. This JPH law should be revised by adding strict sanctions, in both, the article itself and the chapter on criminal provision. Criminal sanctions that can be given are confinement and/or fine payment.