Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences SUHUF: Jurnal Pengkajian Al-Qur'an dan Budaya Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences
Badruddin, Ahmad
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Waqf dan Ibtidā' dalam Mushaf Standar Indonesia dan Mushaf Madinah; Pengaruhnya terhadap Penafsiran Badruddin, Ahmad
SUHUF Vol 6 No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur'an

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22548/shf.v6i2.26

Abstract

The experts of the Qur'an formulate and develop the theories about the Waqf and Ibtida’ which further are included in the Mushaf of the Quran with certain signs to make it easier for the readers of the Qur’an, especially for the foreigners (non-Arabic speaking people). The fact that exists is that there is a diversity of the sign of the stopping, particularly in the Indonesian standard manuscript and that of the Medina. Does it affect the interpretation? This paper tries to give an answer with the hope that this effort is expected to be the intellectual treasure that enriches the understanding of the people. Therefore, the confusion in some parts of society caused by this diversity can be overcome.Keywords : about the Waqf (stoppings) and Ibtida'(Beginnings), Indonesian standard manuscript and Medinan manuscript , diversity , intellectual treasure.
Compounding Repression and Electoral Integrity: A Dynamic Panel Study of 142 Countries, 2012–2024, with Policy Implications for Indonesia Badruddin, Ahmad; Ananda, Sabrina
Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 9 No. 4 (2026): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences
Publisher : HM Publisher in collaboration with CMHC Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/oaijss.v9i4.332

Abstract

Background: Elections are increasingly retained while the conditions for verifying them are degraded, yet restriction of digital space and repression of civil-society organisations are almost always estimated separately, so whether they substitute or reinforce is unknown. Objective: To estimate both instruments jointly and test the derived prediction that a negative interaction identifies two partially substitutable verification routes, whereas a positive interaction identifies a weakest-link chain. Methods: A balanced panel of 142 electoral democracies and transitional regimes from 2012–2024 (N = 1,704 country-years), constructed from Varieties of Democracy version 14, the Perceptions of Electoral Integrity index, and World Development Indicators, was analysed using two-step system generalized method of moments with the Windmeijer correction. Results: Digital space restriction reduced the Clean Elections Index by 0.221 points per unit at the mean of the moderator (widest interval attainable over the unreported covariance: 0.154 to 0.288; worst-case p < 0.001), equivalent to 0.058 points per SD; civil-society repression reduced it by 0.254 points per unit (p < 0.001). The interaction was negative (−0.094; 95% CI −0.155 to −0.033; p = 0.002): the damage from closing digital space rose from −0.186 where civil society was least constrained to −0.277 where it was most constrained under every admissible coefficient covariance. Conclusion: The routes are substitutes: repression destroys redundancy, and the return to opening digital space is largest where civil society is weakest, inverting the usual sequencing intuition for Indonesian reform. Whether the outcome was measured annually or carried forward between elections could not be established, which conditions the dynamic results.
Compounding Repression and Electoral Integrity: A Dynamic Panel Study of 142 Countries, 2012–2024, with Policy Implications for Indonesia Badruddin, Ahmad; Ananda, Sabrina
Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 9 No. 4 (2026): Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences
Publisher : HM Publisher in collaboration with CMHC Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/oaijss.v9i4.332

Abstract

Background: Elections are increasingly retained while the conditions for verifying them are degraded, yet restriction of digital space and repression of civil-society organisations are almost always estimated separately, so whether they substitute or reinforce is unknown. Objective: To estimate both instruments jointly and test the derived prediction that a negative interaction identifies two partially substitutable verification routes, whereas a positive interaction identifies a weakest-link chain. Methods: A balanced panel of 142 electoral democracies and transitional regimes from 2012–2024 (N = 1,704 country-years), constructed from Varieties of Democracy version 14, the Perceptions of Electoral Integrity index, and World Development Indicators, was analysed using two-step system generalized method of moments with the Windmeijer correction. Results: Digital space restriction reduced the Clean Elections Index by 0.221 points per unit at the mean of the moderator (widest interval attainable over the unreported covariance: 0.154 to 0.288; worst-case p < 0.001), equivalent to 0.058 points per SD; civil-society repression reduced it by 0.254 points per unit (p < 0.001). The interaction was negative (−0.094; 95% CI −0.155 to −0.033; p = 0.002): the damage from closing digital space rose from −0.186 where civil society was least constrained to −0.277 where it was most constrained under every admissible coefficient covariance. Conclusion: The routes are substitutes: repression destroys redundancy, and the return to opening digital space is largest where civil society is weakest, inverting the usual sequencing intuition for Indonesian reform. Whether the outcome was measured annually or carried forward between elections could not be established, which conditions the dynamic results.
Co-Authors Ananda, Sabrina