Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi English Focus: Journal of English Language Education
Setiyono, Wahyu
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Pengaruh Faktor Fundamental terhadap Return Saham Hariyani, Diyah Santi; Setiyono, Wahyu; Langgeng. W, Anggita; Apriyanti, Apriyanti
Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi Vol 2 No 2 (2018): DESEMBER 2018
Publisher : Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33603/jka.v2i2.1646

Abstract

Purpose this study to test empirically the influence of fundamental factors on Stock Return. Quantitative research, with purposive sampling method of property and real estate sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014-2016 using the quarterly period. which meets the criteria has been selected as a sample of 23 companies to analyze data by techniques used in this study are multiple regression and hypothesis testing using t-test and F-test with a significant level of 5%. results of this research show that only partially Interest Rate that significantly influence the Return of Share, while the Current Ratio (CR), Total Asset Turn Over (TATO), Debt To Equity Ratio (DER), Net Profit Margin (NPM) and Inflation is not significant effect on Stock Return. While simultaneously Current Ratio (CR), Total Asset Turn Over (TATO), Debt To Equity Ratio (DER), Net Profit Margin (NPM), Interest Rate and Inflation significantly influence Stock Return.Keywords: Fundamental Factors, Stock Return.
Cohesive Devices Function within Toulmin’s Argument Structure: A Discourse Analysis of EFL Students’ Argumentative Essay Setiyono, Wahyu; Widhiyanto, Widhiyanto
Jurnal Bahasa Inggris Vol 9 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pancasakti Tegal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines how cohesive devices function within the components of Toulmin’s Model of Argumentation in EFL undergraduate students’ argumentative essays. Despite extensive research on cohesion in academic writing, few studies have explicitly explored the functional relationship between cohesive choices and argumentative structure, particularly in the Indonesian EFL undergraduate context. Employing a qualitative discourse analysis design, the study analyzed five argumentative essays produced by students enrolled in a Factual and Critical Writing course at a public university in Indonesia. Drawing on Halliday and & Hasan’s (1976) cohesion framework and Toulmin’s (1958) argumentation model as complementary analytical lenses, the analysisi identified and classified cohesive devices before mapping their rhetorical functions onto each argument component. The findings reveal three principal patterns. First, conjunction and reference were the most dominant cohesion categories, while substitution and ellipsis were entirely absent. Second, adversative conjunctions most consistently supported the claim and rebuttal components, whereas lexical cohesion – when realized through collocation and synonymy – most effectively reinforced data and warrant construction. Third, the backing component was absent from all five essays, and rebuttal moves were uniformly incomplete across the corpus. These findings demonstrate that cohesive density does not automatically produce argumentative strength, as the rhetorical effectiveness of cohesive devices depends on their functional appropriateness, referential precision, and the propositional richness of the content they connect. The study concludes with pedagogical recommendations for integrating function-focused cohesion instruction with Toulmin-based argumentative scaffolding in EFL writing courses.
Co-Authors Apriyanti Apriyanti Hariyani, Diyah Santi Langgeng. W, Anggita W, Widhiyanto