Savitri, Yolanda
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Evaluation of Online-Based Student Learning: Models During New Normal Pandemic Covid-19 in Indonesia Siswati, Sri; Astiena, Adila Kasni; Savitri, Yolanda
Journal of Nonformal Education Vol 6, No 2 (2020): August 2020
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jne.v6i2.25599

Abstract

WHO reports that 150 countries have seen 170,000 cases of Covid 19 and 7,000 deaths. Indonesia in June 2020 there were 52,812 cases, 2,720 deaths. The Regional Head adopted a policy of working at home, including West Sumatra and Padang City implementing Large-Scale Social Restrictions (PSBB) in early April, and June 8, 2020 entering the New Normal era. This policy affects formal education that runs online. Webinars on topics related to the Covid-19 outbreak emerged as part of non-formal education. The research objective is to look at the conditions of online formal learning, when the PSBB started and the new normal era. Descriptive research through the Google Form link to students in Padang randomly to obtain information in online learning. Research shows online learning is very helpful in education, but 55.6% of respondents feel less effective during the PSBB and the new normal period increases by 55.7%. Complaints are generally the large number of assignments; the cost is 78.6% burdensome and 98.6% of students are anxious. 80% of students expect e learning or blended learning. At least face-to-face learning is needed for the emotional relationship between students and lecturers in online learning. New strategies and techniques for dealing with blended learning for non-formal education need to be carried out with the discipline of health protocols.
Description of Knowledge, Vaccination Status and Covid-19 Incidence in Students of the FKK UMJ Nutrition Study Program Kharisma, Dayu Swasti; Rayhana, Rayhana; Savitri, Yolanda; Utami, Shafira Kurniawaty
JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala Vol 8, No 4 (2023): JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala (Desember)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/jupe.v8i4.6389

Abstract

Covid-19 (Corona virus disease 2019) is an acute respiratory infection caused by SARS-COV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2). The spread of Covid-19 is quite fast and occurs in various countries throughout the world. The development of the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia continues to show progress in a better direction. This is the hard work of all elements of society and the government in implementing health protocols and following the complete dose and booster vaccination program. The aim of this research is to determine the description of knowledge, vaccination status and the incidence of Covid-19 among Nutrition Study Program Students, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Muhammadiyah University, Jakarta. This research is a descriptive study with a cross sectional design. Data was taken using a questionnaire collected online. Of the 81 respondents who met the inclusion criteria, 4 people (5%) were male and 77 people (95%) were female. Respondents' ages varied from 17 (2 people; 2.5%), 18 (10 people; 12.4%), 19 (26 people, 32%), 20 (10 people; 12.4%), 21 (14 people ; 17.3%), 22 (12 people; 14.81%), 23 (6 people; 7.4%), and 27 years (1 person; 1.23%). Each respondent who received 0 doses, 1 dose, 2 doses, 3 doses and 4 doses of vaccination was 1 (1.2%), 1 (1.2%), 32 (39.6%) , 39 (48.14%), and 8 (9.9%) people. The history of exposure to Covid-19 for each respondent was never exposed, exposed once, and exposed twice, totaling 58 (71.6%), 19 (23.5%), and 4 (4.9%) people. 3 (3.7%) respondents had been hospitalized due to exposure to Covid-19, while 78 (96.3) people had never been hospitalized. The level of knowledge of respondents regarding Covid-19 and vaccination was 68 (84%) people with a good level of knowledge, 11 (13.6%) people with a fair level, and 2 (2.4%) people with a poor level of knowledge.