Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Palmyra Fiber as Additional Materials on Solid Concrete Brick of Aggregate
Kocani, Aleksandër
Unknown Affiliation
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Materials Science & Nanotechnology

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Is there a Unique or non Unique Value Profile for Albanian Social Actors? (The Study Case of Tirana Electorate in 2003, 2008, 2010 and 2011) Kocani, Aleksandër
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 1 (2013): January 2013
Publisher : Richtmann Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This paper shows the results of an empirique panel study carried out in 2003, 2008, 2010 and 2010. The start point for thispaper was the notice of C.Brooks and J.Manza about the possibility for reaching opposite results if you repeat the Inglehart’sinterviews by other methods. Here one may ask: Is there a indicator of the problem related with the value’s profile nature ofsocial actors. In this case, you may consider two alternatives: 1) the social actor has only one value profile, or on the contrary2) he does not has such a value profile. The last one may be separated into two cases: a) or there is not a value profile, but itis created by interaction between knowledge subject and object ; or b) there are two opposite value profile which are selectedoccasionally. The empirical testing is possible if one may find or not the influence upon the respondents during the intreviews.If there is only one value profile you can not find possible influencies. On the contrary you have to consider there is not onevalue profile.
The Missing Third Question Kocani, Aleksandër
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 1 (2013): January 2013
Publisher : Richtmann Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This is about a question that could have been put logically by Einstein or anyone that has followed his way of reasoning,following two other guided or heuristic questions. In the literature that analyses Einstein’s scientific work, it is said that in hisanalysis of so-called mechanical principle of relativity, he was trying to understand if there was something in the laws of naturethat was justifying it. Logically, a question comes up: Did something exist in laws of nature that conditioned discrimination inidentification possibilities of the difference between mechanical experiments from one side and optical, magnetic etc. ones onthe other? Why in principle was impossible for mechanical experiments to identify this difference, but it was not for, say, opticalexperiments? Einstein by his principle of restricted relativity gives an answer to this question. He did the same for “Why”-s ofprincipal impossibility to differentiate the rest from the straight-lined uniformed motion by any physical experiment carried withina system of reference. Now is the time to ask the third “Why” which logically follows the two mentioned and to propose ananswer. That is the “Why”-s of principal impossibility to differentiate the immobility (or the rest) from the any mechanical motionby any physical experiment carried within a system of reference.
Co-Authors