<![CDATA[“Coordination” the harmonious functioning of interrelated organs and parts, applied especially to the processof the motor apparatus of the brain which provides for the co-working of particular groups of musclesfor the performance of definite adaptive useful response. In Current Clinical Practises there Less DevicesWhich can help in Gaining Eye-Hand Coordination. Objectives: To compare the effect of conventionaltraining approach and eye-hand coordination along with conventional training. Materials and Method: Thesubjects in Datta Meghe College Of Physiotherapy were screened and 42 subjects were divided into 2groups i.e Group A subjects were given Conventional Physiotherapy for coordination training and GroupEye-Hand Coordination Device along with given Conventional Physiotherapy for coordination training.The interpretation of the study was done on the basis of comparing pre-test and post-test assessment of NCTgrading and FMA-UE.Result: Intragroup comparison results showed that NCT grading and FMA-UE scale were statisticallysignificant in both the groups (p<0.0001). Whereas the intergroup comparison results showed that Eye-HandCoordination The device along with Conventional physiotherapy was statistically significant in improvingNCT score (p=0.0021) and FMA-UE score (p=0.0001) than only Conventional Physiotherapy alone forEye-hand In-coordination Conclusion: The Eye-Hand Coordination Device was Significantly effective whenGiven With Conventional Physiotherapy For treating In-coordination and improvement in coordination.Conventional Physiotherapy is also effective in treating in-coordination, but after a certain duration oftreatment, the patient starts getting adapted and chances of achieving the plateau phase]]>
