Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.844
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Veteran Law Review Jurnal Studia Legalia Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Primagraha Law Review Strategi Memperkuat Integritas Lembaga Peradilan Indonesia Journal of Law and Justice Judex Laguens
Pakpahan, Novritsar Hasintongan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Immunology & microbiology Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Verifikasi Keabsahan Fotokopi Bukti Surat Bertandatangan Elektronik QR Code pada Sidang Daring dan Sidang Tatap Muka Pakpahan, Novritsar Hasintongan
Judex Laguens Vol 1 No 3 (2023)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The development of judicial information technology is increasingly felt its function when the world is experiencing a global COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. The pandemic requires a health protocol, namely the limitation of distance and contact between individuals in order to prevent the chain of spread of the COVID-19 outbreak. As a result, trials that are usually conducted face-to-face must be limited in order to prevent the spread of the COVID-19 outbreak. Problems arise when a lot of evidence in legal practice involves the use of letter evidence with electronic QR Code signatures that have not been regulated in procedural law, especially in terms of submitting photocopies as proof of letters such as family cards and marriage certificates. This research aims to find out and describe the techniques for judges in verifying the validity of copies or photocopies of letters with electronic QR Code signatures submitted as letter evidence in court both online and face-to-face. This type of research is normative legal research using descriptive analysis method. The results showed that the implementation of checking the validity of letter evidence must still be carried out in accordance with the provisions of criminal procedural law and civil procedural law using an android-based mobile phone through the VeryDS application issued by the Indonesian Electronic Certification Centre or through sending QR Code electronic signature samples via the web
Peraturan Contempt of Court Untuk Memulihkan Marwah Peradilan Akibat Pelanggaran Integritas Melalui Peradilan Ulangan Pakpahan, Novritsar Hasintongan
Equality : Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 2 No 2 (2025): Penegakan Integritas dan Kepastian Hukum dalam Kelembagaan dan Profesi Hukum di I
Publisher : Yayasan Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Sisi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69836/equality-jlj.v2i2.289

Abstract

This research is based on the issue of lack of contempt of court statutes and the common practice of denigrating judiciaries in trials. Background of the study is due to common practice of integrity abuse and lack of judiciary’s dignity protection that pushes the need for contempt of court statute formulation. The paper then formulates two research questions, namely how the regulation of contempt of court would revitalize court’s dignty and how regulation can be formulated for legal remedy towards tainted legal process. The methodology of the research is based on normative research that applied statute approach, conceptual approach, case approach, and philosophical approach. The research has considered previous researches such as Probo, Perbawati, Santoso, Gayatri, and Rachman’s research. The development of contempt of court in the last 5 to 10 years showed that contempt of court regulation has been better formulated through Act 1 of 2023, but it didn’t specify types of contempt of court. The result showed that contempt of court statute should regulate specifically regarding act of denigrating court’s dignity and reformulation of retrial legal remedy for tainted legal process.
Co-Authors Pakpahan, Binsar Pamopo