Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review Jurnal Syntax Transformation
Niken Febriana Dwi
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Peran Negara Atas Perlindungan Hukum Tenaga Kerja Indonesia Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Daniel Marshal Sajou; Kerenhapukh Milka Tarmadi Putri; Niken Febriana Dwi
Jurnal Syntax Transformation Vol 1 No 08 (2020): Jurnal Syntax Transformation
Publisher : CV. Syntax Corporation Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jst.v1i8.137

Abstract

Sekarang ini seluruh dunia termasuk Indonesia sedang merasa keresahan karena permasalahan tentang Covid-19 yang menimbulkan kerugian dalam berbagai sektor kehidupan. Kerugian yang sangat terlihat yaitu dalam kesehatan masyarakat, perekonomian dan dalam sektor lainnya. Contoh yang paling terasa adalah pada sektor perekonomian. Karena banyak perusahaan yang terpaksa melakukan pengurangan tenaga kerja, sehingga banyak sekali masyarakat yang kehilangan mata pencahariannya. Artikel ini berisi pembahasan tentang bagaimana peranan pemerintah dalam menangani masalah perlindungan hukum terhadap Tenaga Kerja Indonesia pada masa Covid-19 dan mengapa perusahaan mengambil kebijakan PHK di masa pandemic Covid-19 ini. Tujuan dari ditulisnya artikel ini adalah mengetahui bagaimana langkah yang telah dan akan ditempuh pemerintah untuk menangani masalah tenaga kerja pada masa sekarang ini. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu metode penelitian yang menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Metode ini meneliti hukum dengan melihat berdasarkan norma hukum dan kepustakaan. Hasil akhir dari penelitian ini adalah upaya pemerintah dalam menangani perlindungan tenaga kerja pada masa pandemi Covid-19 dan tingkat keberhasilan atau efektvitas kebijakan pemerintah atas perlindungan hukum terhadap Tenaga Kerja Indonesia pada masa pandemi. Berdasarkan analisa data yang dilakukan, untuk melindungi hak pekerja pemerintah mengeluarkan beberapa kebijakan yang dapat dijadikan solusi bagi para pekerja agar dapat tetap bertahan di masa pandemi Covid-19, beberapa kebijakannya, yaitu: kebijakan kartu prakerja yang bertujuan untuk memberantas kemiskinan dan mengurangi pengangguran, pemberian insentif bagi tenaga kerja medis sebagai bentuk apresiasi, penerbitan kebijakan dan perlindungan terhadap tenaga kerja yang bertujuan untuk memberikan perlindungan bagi tenaga kerja di masa pandemi Covid-19 serta menjamin keselamatan para pekerja.
Unsur Direncanakan Pada Pasal 340 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Tanjung Karang Nomor 145/Pid/2020/PT Tjk Niken Febriana Dwi; Ade Adhari
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2019

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the fulfillment of the planned elements in Article 340 of the Criminal Code against the Tanjung Karang High Court Decision Number 145 / Pid / 2020 / Pt Tjk. Where the Judge in deciding this case explained that the planned element was not fulfilled on the grounds that the actions committed by the defendant were spontaneous. The research method used is: normative juridical legal research conducted with literature studies or secondary data as a basis for researching by conducting searches of regulations and literature related to the problem under study. The data collected is then processed and explained descriptively so that the relationship of data with one another can be described factually. The results of the study showed: that in the Tanjung Karang High Court Decision Number 145 / Pid / 2020 / PT Tjk, the judge decided the defendant Edi Antoni alias Edi Recing bin Kemis using Article 338 of the Criminal Code, which was previously the defendant through Kalianda District Court Decision Number 209 / Pid.B / 2020 / PN Kla the defendant received a verdict for participating in murder. In the appeal process at the Tanjung karang High Court, the defendant can be convicted using Article 340 of the Criminal Code concerning Premeditated Murder because of the fulfillment of the premeditated element in Article 340 of the Criminal Code, it can be proven by the defendant admitting he was conscious when committing his act and wanted the death of the victim and the defendant could not prove the origin of the knife used to commit the murder.
Unsur Direncanakan Pada Pasal 340 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Tanjung Karang Nomor 145/Pid/2020/PT Tjk Niken Febriana Dwi; Ade Adhari
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2019

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the fulfillment of the planned elements in Article 340 of the Criminal Code against the Tanjung Karang High Court Decision Number 145 / Pid / 2020 / Pt Tjk. Where the Judge in deciding this case explained that the planned element was not fulfilled on the grounds that the actions committed by the defendant were spontaneous. The research method used is: normative juridical legal research conducted with literature studies or secondary data as a basis for researching by conducting searches of regulations and literature related to the problem under study. The data collected is then processed and explained descriptively so that the relationship of data with one another can be described factually. The results of the study showed: that in the Tanjung Karang High Court Decision Number 145 / Pid / 2020 / PT Tjk, the judge decided the defendant Edi Antoni alias Edi Recing bin Kemis using Article 338 of the Criminal Code, which was previously the defendant through Kalianda District Court Decision Number 209 / Pid.B / 2020 / PN Kla the defendant received a verdict for participating in murder. In the appeal process at the Tanjung karang High Court, the defendant can be convicted using Article 340 of the Criminal Code concerning Premeditated Murder because of the fulfillment of the premeditated element in Article 340 of the Criminal Code, it can be proven by the defendant admitting he was conscious when committing his act and wanted the death of the victim and the defendant could not prove the origin of the knife used to commit the murder.
Co-Authors Ade Adhari Daniel Marshal Sajou Kerenhapukh Milka Tarmadi Putri