Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Privat Law Unes Law Review
Sari, Nurdiani Yusnita
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PERBANDINGAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ANAK ANGKAT SETELAH PENGANGKATAN ANAK MELALUI PENETAPAN PENGADILAN NEGERI DAN PENGADILAN AGAMA Sari, Nurdiani Yusnita; Cahyaningsih, Diana Tantri
Jurnal Privat Law Vol 6, No 2 (2018): JULI-DESEMBER
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/privat.v6i2.25610

Abstract

AbstractThis study article to determine the arrangements regarding legal protection to the adopted child after adoption through the determination of the court. This research is a normative research viewed from prespective with statue approach. This research is using primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The legal materials collected through library research and study of the document which is then analyzed using a technique based on the method of deductive reasoning deduction. Determination issued by the District Court and the Religious Courts have different legal protections because of the difference in status and position of the adopted child. The status and position of such a biological child provided by the District Court gives a wider legal protection to the adopted child than the adopted child who issued their determination through the Religious Courts.Keywords: Adoption; Adopted; Determination of The Court; Legal Protection;AbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaturan mengenai perlindungan hukum pada anak angkat setelah pengangkatan anak melalui penetapan pengadilan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif  yang  bersifat  preskriptif  dan  teknis  atau  terapan.  Pendekatan  penelitian  menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang. Bahan hukum penelitian ini  menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum melalui studi kepustakaan atau studi dokumen (library research), yang selanjutnya dianalisis dengan menggunakan teknik deduksi. Penetapan yang dikeluarkan oleh Pengadilan Negeri dan Pengadilan Agama memiliki perlindungan hukum yang berbeda karena perbedaan status dan keududukan anak angkat yang diberikan. Status dan kedudukan seperti anak kandung yang diberikan oleh Pengadilan Negeri memberikan perlindungan hukum yang lebih luas pada anak angkat daripada anak angkat yang pengesahan pengangkatannya melalui Pengadilan AgamaKata Kunci: Pengangkatan Anak; Anak Angkat; Penetapan Pengadilan; Perlindungan Hukum;
Implementasi Penjatuhan Denda dalam Putusan Perkara Pelanggaran Pasal 17 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Sari, Nurdiani Yusnita
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.890

Abstract

This study aims to review the implementation of fines imposed by the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) in decisions related to violations of Article 17 of Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition as amended by Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation. This study used a qualitative method by analyzing four KPPU decisions that reflect the implementation of fines for violations of Article 17 of the Antimonopoly Law. The results showed there was a mismatch between the amount of fines imposed and the losses caused by monopolistic practices and unfair business competition. This study recommends changing the KPPU's administrative sanction system from the weight of the actors to the losses incurred and felt by the public, changing the method of calculating fines based on Government Regulation Number 44 of 2021, establishing an external oversight mechanism for the KPPU, functional differentiation within the KPPU, and granting authority to reporters to file objections to the court.
Co-Authors Diana Tantri Cahyaningsih