Rahmasantika, Danty
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA PADA OPERASI HITUNG PECAHAN BERDASARKAN TINGKAT KECERDASAN SISWA Rahmasantika, Danty; Prahmana, Rully
Journal of Honai Math Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018): Journal of Honai Math
Publisher : Universitas Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Junior high school’s students should be able to determine fraction and alsoimplement the concepts of fraction to solve mathematics problem. However,in reality, so many mistake that occur for students in solving mathematicsproblem in the operation of fraction. The intelligence of students also affectsthe number of errors in solving the fractional counting operations. So, thepurpose of this study was to determine students' errors in solving the problemof fractional counting operations based on the level of students’ intelligence.This research is a descriptive qualitative research. The research results showthat the different category of students’ intelligent produce differentmathematical problem solving abilities. Students with low intelligencecategories make many errors in their completion. On the other hands, thestudent with high intelligence category make a few errors. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v1i2.1041
DESAIN PEMBELAJARAN PERBANDINGAN SENILAI MENGGUNAKAN GUIDED INQUIRY Rahmasantika, Danty; Prahmana, Rully Charitas Indra
Journal of Honai Math Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): Journal of Honai Math
Publisher : Universitas Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30862/jhm.v2i2.65

Abstract

This study aims to support students' understanding of learning comparative material and determine student learning outcomes incomparable learning through LAS-based guided inquiry learning models. This study uses a research design research method, which was carried out in class VII B SMP N 1 Berbah Sleman. The research instruments used were recording devices, written test sheets, field notes sheets, and questionnaire sheets. The results showed that at the 1st and 2nd meetings, students were seen to be still adapting to the learning design applied. At the next meeting, students can participate in learning activities better. Also, student learning outcomes indicate that the average value obtained by students is 71.57 with Minimum Completeness Criteria (KKM) for a comparison of 70.