Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan Religia : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman
Sahin, Cemal
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Harmonious Dialectics Between Hindu-Muslim in Bali (A Study in Jembrana Regency) Saihu, Made; Sahin, Cemal
Religia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu KeIslaman Vol 23 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/religia.v23i1.2163

Abstract

 This paper discusses the harmonious dialectics process between Hindus and Muslims through ‘urf or localwisdom which is believed to have philosophical, sociological, and psychological values with pluralmulticultural nuances for the community of Jembrana, Province of Bali. This paper focuses on searching theeffectiveness of some ‘urf or local wisdom that functioning as a means of interacting between two religiouscommunities leading to peaceful practices on Hindu-Muslim communities in Jembrana-Bali. The datasources are field observations and unstructured interviews from March-July 2019. This study is a fieldresearch using a case study method. The results show that the dialectics process with a multicultural nuancebetween Hindus and Muslims in Jembrana is through the ‘urf or local wisdom, namely male, ngejot,rebana, and mekepung traditions. Furthermore, from these four traditions, there is a process of activeinvolvement, constructive understanding, and efforts to find joint commitments from various commitments sothat a sense of brotherhood and understanding of the diversity between the two religious communities becomesextremely close. This dialectic can also shape the character of Hindu and Muslim communities in Jembranato be humanist, tolerant, and inclusive, this phenomenon then leads to the process of association, integration,complementation, and sublimation. This research contributes to the field of religious and cultural studies bydemonstrating how ‘urf traditions serve as mechanisms for fostering tolerance, humanism, and inclusivity ina pluralistic society. It confirms the theory that Islamization in the region is not a confrontational processbut rather an adaptive and integrative one. Methodologically, this study highlights the significance ofqualitative case studies in exploring interfaith relations through localized traditions.
Qawāʿid al-Tafsīr sebagai Kerangka Epistemologis untuk Interpretasi Al-Qur’an yang Sah: Sebuah Studi Perbandingan Marāh Labīd dan al-Miṣbāḥ Rokhim, Abdur; Fuad, Sahlul; Sahin, Cemal
Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan Vol 23 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan Vol. 23 No. 2 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Center for Research and Development of Religious Literature and Heritage, Agency for Research and Development and Training, Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31291/jlka.v23i2.1488

Abstract

The growing circulation of ideologically driven and methodology­cally inconsistent Qur’anic interpretations highlights the absence of a clear epistemological standard for assessing interpretive validity. This study addresses this gap by examining Qawāʿid al‑Tafsīr as a structured episte­mo­logical model capable of guiding reliable Qur’anic interpretation. Using qualitative data derived from primary tafsīr texts, the study employ­yed a comparative hermeneutical method and critical textual analysis to evaluate two influential works in the Nusantara tradition: the nineteenth century Marāh Labīd by Shaykh Nawawi al‑Bantani and the contempo­rary Tafsīr al‑Miṣbāḥ by M. Quraish Shihab. The analysis is organized around five epistemological pillars that function as analytical domains, namely exegetical competence, ethical integrity, textual understanding, socio cultural contextual awareness and methodological coherence. The findings show three key patterns. First, both exegetes consistently apply these principles, demonstrating their normative relevance across historical contexts. Second, Nawawi al‑Bantani emphasizes textual stability and doctrinal continuity through classical linguistic analysis and transmitted readings. Third, Shihab prioritizes contextual relevance by employing thematic coherence and maqāṣid oriented reasoning. These differences illustrate the adaptability of Qawāʿid al‑Tafsīr to diverse interpretive orientations. The study concludes that Qawāʿid al‑Tafsīr provides a dynamic and universal framework for safeguarding interpretive validity. Its application strengthens Qur’anic hermeneutics in pluralistic societies and offers a practical tool for mitigating deviant interpretations while promoting responsible exegetical practice. 
Co-Authors Fuad, Sahlul Rokhim, Abdur