Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Determination of Dolus and Tempus Delicti on the Crime of Hate Speech Conducted from Outside the State of Indonesia by Using Social Media Facilities Yasa, I Wayan Budha
Media Komunikasi FPIPS Vol 20, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/mkfis.v20i1.30426

Abstract

The development of information technology, media and communication at this time has changed the behavior of society and human civilization globally. In this regard, in addition to the positive benefits arising from the development of information technology and so on, such as the emergence of facilities or media that can make it easier for humans to work, there are also negative impacts, such as crimes in cyberspace. One of the crimes in cyberspace in question is hate speech. These actions can be classified into criminal acts, because these actions will have an impact on society in general. Moreover, this action was carried out from outside the State of Indonesia using social media facilities, of course it would be very difficult to determine the place (locus delicti) and time (tempus delicti) to try the perpetrators of the hate speech crime. For this reason, it is necessary to know how to determine the locus and tempus delicti of the crime or crime in question.
Konten Prank Youtuber Sebagai Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik: Youtuber Prank Content as a Crime Under the Information and Electronic Transactions Law Yasa, I Wayan Budha; Wiguna, Gede Yudiarta
Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi Hukum: Berintegritas dan Berbasis Teknologi
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/snhunnes.v7i2.738

Abstract

Prank is a form of joke or joke that is intentionally made by someone with the intention of pranking or pranking other people with the aim of creating a sense of satisfaction for the prank maker. There are various types of pranks that are generally made to be later used as personal or group content available on various social media such as YouTube. Prank content created by someone like a YouTuber (YouTube content creator) can be considered a crime, even if a prank is a joke or a joke. This is because someone who is a victim of this prank may be harmed or their rights may be violated. The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze YouTuber prank content which can be categorized as a crime under the Information and Electronic Transactions Act and the regulation of YouTuber prank content which is categorized as a crime in the Electronic Information and Transactions Act. The method used in this research is normative juridical using a legal and conceptual approach. The technique of collecting legal materials used is document study by examining primary and secondary legal materials. The method of analyzing legal materials is carried out in a normative juridical manner which is presented descriptively. Based on the results and discussion of this research, it was found that YouTuber prank content which can be categorized as a criminal offense under the Information and Electronic Transactions Act is prank content that contains content that violates decency, insults and/or defamation, and can cause hatred or hostility of certain individuals and/or community groups based on ethnicity, religion, race, and inter-group (SARA). Then it was found that, the regulation regarding YouTuber prank content which is categorized as a crime in The Information and Electronic Transaction Law is regulated in Article 27 paragraph (1) and (3) junto Article 45 paragraph (1) and (3) and Article 28 paragraph (2) junto Article 45A paragraph (2).
TINJAUAN VIKTIMOLOGI TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA OLEH ANAK DI KABUPATEN BULELENG Yasa, I Wayan Budha; Mangku, Dewa Gede Sudika; Yuliartini, Ni Putu Rai
Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia Vol 5, No 1 (2022): Maret, Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jatayu.v5i1.45924

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) mengkaji dan menganalisis tentang faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan anak menjadi korban penyalahgunaan narkotika di Kabupaten Buleleng; dan (2) mengkaji dan menganalisis mengenai upaya perlindungan hukum terhadap anak sebagai korban penyalahgunaan narkotika di Kabupaten Buleleng. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan yaitu penelitian hukum empiris yang bersifat deskriptif. Data dan sumber data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data primer dan data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah teknik studi dokumen, observasi, dan wawancara. Teknik penentuan sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah non probability sampling dengan jenis sampel yaitu purposive sample. Teknik pengolahan dan analisis data dilakukan secara kualitatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, diketahui bahwa (1) faktor penyebab anak menjadi korban penyalahgunaan narkotika di Kabupaten Buleleng adalah hasil dari perbuatannya sendiri yang tergolong ke dalam faktor individu serta dipengaruhi faktor lainnya seperti faktor keluarga, faktor lingkungan, faktor pendidikan, dan faktor perkembangan teknologi informasi; (2) upaya perlindungan hukum terhadap anak sebagai korban penyalahgunaan narkotika di Kabupaten Buleleng yaitu dilakukan oleh Badan Narkotika Nasional Kabupaten Buleleng dan Satuan Reserse Narkoba Kepolisian Resor Buleleng secara preventif sebagai bentuk pencegahan dan secara represif sebagai bentuk penanggulangan.