Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Media Hukum
Nur Wijayanti, Septi
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Hubungan Antara Pusat dan Daerah Dalam Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Nur Wijayanti, Septi
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 23, No 2 (2016): December
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.2016.0079.186-199

Abstract

Undang-undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah yang diundangkan pada tanggal 2 Oktober 2014 merubah wajah hubungan Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah. Secara hukum maka Undang-undang  nomor 32 tahun 2004 dinyatakan sudah tidak berlaku lagi, dan dalam masa 2 (dua) tahun kedepan seluruh perubahan dan peraturan pelaksanaan  yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang nomor 23 tahun 2014 harus ditetapkan. Otonomi daerah yang dijalankan selama ini semata-mata hanya dipahami sebagai perpindahan kewajiban pemerintah pusat kepada pemerintah daerah untuk masyarakat. Padahal substansi penting dari otonomi daerah adalah pelimpahan kewenangan dari pusat ke daerah secara politik dan ekonomi agar pembangunan dan pertumbuhan ekonomi berlangsung secara adil dan merata di daerah. Makalah ini membahas tentang  konsep otonomi daerah dalam kerangka Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia  yang ditekankan lebih tajam dalam Undang-Undang nomor 23 tahun 2014. Perubahan yang mendasar lain yang tidak ada dalam Undang-Undang nomor 32 tahun 2004 ialah ditetapkannya Urusan Wajib Daerah, dan pola hubungan Urusan Konkuren antara Pemerintah Pusat, Provinsi dan Kabupaten/ Kota yang langsung dimasukkan dalam Lampiran Undang-Undang nomor 23 tahun 2014 bahwa klasifikasi urusan Pemerintahan terdiri atas urusan pemerintahan absolut, urusan pemerintahan konkuren, dan urusan pemerintahan umum
Implikasi Pengujian Undang-undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Mewujudkan Maqashid Syari’ah Nur Wijayanti, Septi; Lailam, Tanto
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 25, No 2, December 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.2018.0115.202-216

Abstract

This research is about the implications of constitutional review by Constitutional Court in realizing maqashid sharia backgrounded by the ambiguity of whether or not to use the maqashid syariah as a benchmark in constitutional review. The research is to observe the use of maqashid syariah as a benchmark and the implications of the legal system in Indonesia. The method used is normative legal research focusing on several decisions of Constitutional Court. The results of the study show that the Constitutional Court accommodates maqashid sharia. Based on the analysis of Constitutional Court Verdict Number 2-3/ PUU-V/2007, Verdict Number 12/PUU-V/2007, Verdict Number 68/PUU-XII/2014, Verdict Number 85/PUU-XI/2013 show that in constitutional review, the Constitutional Court uses the maqashid syariah as a benchmarks (in the framework of  Pancasila) in line with the idealization of Baldatun Thayyibatun wa Rabbun Ghafur meant to maqashid syariah focusing on maintaining the benefit of religion/din, maintaining the benefit of the soul/nafs, maintaining the benefit of reason/aql, maintaining the benefit of descendants/nasl, and maintaining the benefit of wealth/mal) has been accommodated and applied in constitutional review. The implication is that maqashid sharia becomes one of benchmarks in constitutional review and the Constitutional Court can intepret the contextualization of maqashid sharia in various cases.
Implikasi Pengujian Undang-undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Mewujudkan Maqashid Syari’ah Nur Wijayanti, Septi; Lailam, Tanto
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 25, No 2, December 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.2018.0115.202-216

Abstract

This research is about the implications of constitutional review by Constitutional Court in realizing maqashid sharia backgrounded by the ambiguity of whether or not to use the maqashid syariah as a benchmark in constitutional review. The research is to observe the use of maqashid syariah as a benchmark and the implications of the legal system in Indonesia. The method used is normative legal research focusing on several decisions of Constitutional Court. The results of the study show that the Constitutional Court accommodates maqashid sharia. Based on the analysis of Constitutional Court Verdict Number 2-3/ PUU-V/2007, Verdict Number 12/PUU-V/2007, Verdict Number 68/PUU-XII/2014, Verdict Number 85/PUU-XI/2013 show that in constitutional review, the Constitutional Court uses the maqashid syariah as a benchmarks (in the framework of  Pancasila) in line with the idealization of Baldatun Thayyibatun wa Rabbun Ghafur meant to maqashid syariah focusing on maintaining the benefit of religion/din, maintaining the benefit of the soul/nafs, maintaining the benefit of reason/aql, maintaining the benefit of descendants/nasl, and maintaining the benefit of wealth/mal) has been accommodated and applied in constitutional review. The implication is that maqashid sharia becomes one of benchmarks in constitutional review and the Constitutional Court can intepret the contextualization of maqashid sharia in various cases.
Co-Authors Tanto Lailam