Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Dialektika Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika
Aryanti, Puput
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
NEWMAN’S ERROR ANALYSIS (NEA) MATERI VOLUME BANGUN RUANG KELAS V SD NEGERI DUKUHTURI 01 KECAMATAN BUMIAYU TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016: Array Aryanti, Puput
Jurnal Dialektika Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Vol. 3 No. 2 (2016): September 2016
Publisher : Universitas Peradaban

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan jenis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika materi volume bangun ruang berdasarkan Newman’s Error Analysis (NEA). Teknik pengambilan data mengunakan tes, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukan untuk soal yang cenderung mudah siswa paling banyak melakukan kesalahan tipe penarikan kesimpulan dengan persentase sebesar 62,5%, kesalahan tipe memahami 12,5%, kesalahan tipe membaca 6,25%, kesalahan tipe transformasi 6,25%, dan kesalahan tipe keterampilan proses 0%. Untuk soal yang cenderung lebih rumit, siswa melakukan kesalahan pada tipe transformasi dengan persentase 62,5%, kesalahan tipe memahami 31,25%, kesalahan tipe membaca 6,25%, kesalahan tipe keterampilan proses dan penarikan kesimpulan 0%. The aim of this research was to describe the type of students' error in geometry volume material by Newman's Error Analysis (NEA). Data collection techniques using tests, interviews, and documentation. The results showed for the questions that most students tend to perform encoding errors type with a percentage of 62.5%, understading errors type of 12.5%, reading error type of 6.25%, transformation error type of 6.25%, and process skills errors type of 0%. For questions that tend to be more complicated, the students made a mistake on transformation errors type with the percentage of 62.5%, understading errors type of 31.25%, reading errors type of 6.25%, process skills and encoding errors type of 0%.
Co-Authors Diana Achmad Sofyan A. Gani