Felemban, Ebaa
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Saudi Citizens on COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multi-region Survey Alreshidi, Maha Sanat; Alreshidi, Nojoud Abdullah Daaya; Felemban, Ebaa; Gonzales, Ferdinand
Makara Journal of Health Research Vol. 25, No. 3
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Although policies and guidelines may not always be optimal in all settings, a tailor-fitted guideline is appropriate. This study aims to determine the differences in the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of Saudi citizens toward Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: A quantitative-comparative-correlational approach was carried out from March 21 to May 22, 2020. Descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and t-test were used to determine the differences in knowledge and demographic characteristics. Linear regression was used to determine relationships among KAP. Results: The participants’ knowledge yielded 82.83%, positive attitudes (M = 2.10; SD = 1.15) and good practices (M = 2.10; SD = 1.15). Significant differences in knowledge were found for gender (t = −6.79; p < 0.001), marital status (F = 10.59; p < 0.001), education (F = 32.46; p < 0.001), occupation (F = 6.79; p < 0.001), and area of residence (F = 7.53; p <.001). Knowledge and practices showed a significant relationship (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Gender, marital status, education, occupation, and area of residence are all causal factors that differ regarding knowledge. Moreover, a significant relationship between knowledge and practice is established, which is necessary to improve. These study results can serve as a basis for creating effective health education programs toward COVID-19.
The relationship between nurses’ speaking up about patient safety and nursing work environment in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study Albalawi, Rawan; Gheith, Nirvana Abdelrahman; Felemban, Ebaa
Belitung Nursing Journal Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): March - April
Publisher : Belitung Raya Publisher - Belitung Raya Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33546/bnj.4233

Abstract

Background: Despite nurses’ proximity to patient care, many remain reluctant to voice safety concerns. A significant gap exists in understanding how the professional work environment influences these behaviors within the Saudi Arabian context, where specific cultural and hierarchical norms may impact communication. Objective: This study examined the relationship between nurses’ speaking up regarding patient safety and the nursing work environment in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive correlational design was used. Data were collected from 270 nurses between August and September 2024 using the Speaking Up About Patient Safety Questionnaire (SUPS-Q) and the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI). Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 28, including descriptive statistics, Spearman’s rank correlation, and ANCOVA. Results: The nursing work environment showed a significant correlation with the speak-up climate. Weak but statistically significant negative correlations were found between perceived concerns and nurse participation (r = -0.210, p = 0.001), quality foundations (r = -0.155, p = 0.011), staffing adequacy (r = -0.184, p = 0.002), and nurse–physician relations (r = -0.156, p = 0.010). Withholding voice also negatively correlated with quality foundations (r = -0.149, p = 0.014) and nurse–physician relations (r = -0.138, p = 0.023). Psychological safety and an encouraging environment showed strong positive correlations with all work environment dimensions (p < 0.001). ANCOVA indicated that education level significantly predicted speaking up (p = 0.042), and experience influenced perceptions of the work environment (p = 0.002), while age and nationality were not significant. Conclusion: Strengthening the work environment is a clinical necessity for safety. Organizations should prioritize “Just Culture” initiatives, systemic learning, and visible responses to raised concerns. Practice protocols should include “safe zones” for voicing concerns away from patients. Professional development must focus on communication skills for addressing high-authority figures. Finally, adequate staffing is essential to empower nurses to prioritize safety advocacy over basic tasks.