Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Journal of Political Issues
Wardhani, Sri Budi Eko
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Parliament Opposition Strategy in Indonesia (Case Study of Gerindra Party During Joko Widodo and Jusuf Kalla's Era 2014-2019) Rachman, Muhammad Ridho; Wardhani, Sri Budi Eko
Jurnal Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Vol 5, No 3 (2020): Democracy and Political Expression
Publisher : Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ipsr.v5i3.21550

Abstract

This research analyzes parliament opposition in Indonesia by Gerindra Party (2014-2019) as a party whose consistently outside the government and functioning as an opposition party. How is it implemented, and what kind of strategy Gerindra performs to influence the parliamentary decision-making process? To answer this, the study uses qualitative methods by collecting data through literature review, data tracking, and in-depth interviews. The theoretical perspective in this research used Steinack's argument about the opposition strategy who states that the behavior of the opposition party in parliament is the accumulation of the impact of the structural and institutional factors, socio-demographic, and party’s informal rules of engagement. The research found that as an opposition party, Gerindra focuses on content-oriented strategies using the area of public policymaking as a medium of political interplays such as at the commission level or other work units.
Parliament Opposition Strategy in Indonesia (Case Study of Gerindra Party During Joko Widodo and Jusuf Kalla's Era 2014-2019) Rachman, Muhammad Ridho; Wardhani, Sri Budi Eko
Jurnal Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Vol 5, No 3 (2020): Democracy and Political Expression
Publisher : Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ipsr.v5i3.21550

Abstract

This research analyzes parliament opposition in Indonesia by Gerindra Party (2014-2019) as a party whose consistently outside the government and functioning as an opposition party. How is it implemented, and what kind of strategy Gerindra performs to influence the parliamentary decision-making process? To answer this, the study uses qualitative methods by collecting data through literature review, data tracking, and in-depth interviews. The theoretical perspective in this research used Steinack's argument about the opposition strategy who states that the behavior of the opposition party in parliament is the accumulation of the impact of the structural and institutional factors, socio-demographic, and party’s informal rules of engagement. The research found that as an opposition party, Gerindra focuses on content-oriented strategies using the area of public policymaking as a medium of political interplays such as at the commission level or other work units.
Strategi Advokasi Masyarakat Sipil dalam Mendesak Pembatalan Revisi Regulasi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Roshady, Mohammad Ezha Fachriza; Wardhani, Sri Budi Eko
Journal of Political Issues Vol 3 No 1 (2021): Journal of Political Issues (February - July)
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Politik Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33019/jpi.v3i1.54

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan strategi gerakan masyarakat sipil yang tergabung dalam koalisi masyarakat sipil antikorupsi. Penelitian ini menggunakan teori advokasi dari Sheldon Gen dan Amy Conley Wright. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan sumber data primer dari wawancara, dan pengolahan data sekunder dari berbagai berbagai literatur yang relevan dengan penelitian ini. Koalisi masyarakat sipil antikorupsi mengontrol kekuasaan negara dengan menuntut pemerintah dan DPR bertanggung jawab kepada hukum dan publik dengan mendukung KPK (Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi) dengan tidak melemahkan kelembagaan KPK, dan meningkatkan kesadaran publik terhadap isu-isu penting publik melalui advokasi, dalam hal ini wacana UU KPK yang direvisi oleh DPR. Pada tahun 2019 momentum revisi UU KPK berhasil dilakukan DPR bersama Pemerintah sehingga advokasi yang dilakukan oleh koalisi gagal. Koalisi masyarakat sipil antikorupsi mengadopsi strategi advokasi dengan memperkuat sebuah koalisi besar, melobi pengambil kebijakan, melakukan kajian akademik, dan pelabelan, pemberitaan media, dan melibatkan serta memobilisasi publik dalam melakukan gerakan. Dari kelima strategi advokasi tersebut, pada akhirnya memiliki sisi kekuatan dan kelemahan untuk melakukan sebuah gerakan sosial dalam mempengaruhi kebijakan revisi UU KPK yang namun pada akhirnya strategi advokasi yang dilakukan oleh koalisi masyarakat sipil antikorupsi tidak berhasil mempengaruhi para pemangku kebijakan dan pada tahun 2019, UU mengenai KPK telah direvisi pada 17 September 2019.
Co-Authors Rachman, Muhammad Ridho Roshady, Mohammad Ezha Fachriza