Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sistemasi: Jurnal Sistem Informasi @is The Best [Accounting Information System & Information Technology Business Enterprise]
Annastasia, Syifa
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Electrical & Electronics Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Validitas Arsitektur Bisnis menggunakan Metode Formal PetriNets (Studi Kasus: Perusahaan Manufaktur di Indonesia) Fajrillah, Asti Amalia Nur; Annastasia, Syifa
@is The Best : Accounting Information Systems and Information Technology Business Enterprise Vol 6 No 1 (2021): @is The Best : Accounting Information Systems and Information Technology Business
Publisher : Labkat Press KA FTIK UNIKOM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1417.115 KB) | DOI: 10.34010/aisthebest.v6i1.4800

Abstract

The Gartner Group estimates that 40% of all Enterprise Architecture (EA) programs discontinued due to failure to demonstrate sufficient value for the business. Business architecture has an important role to help companies achieve the desired business values. Before starting to design a business architecture, the steps that need to be done are identifying business processes, a business process is a series of activities that are interrelated to achieve certain business goals. Modelling the good business processes can help to avoid mistakes causing by quality from the beginning, further business process models have an impact on the quality of information system design. Therefore, the quality of the business process model has been recognized as an important factor for successful modelling in the company as well as the need to test the quality of business process models to keep the quality up to minimum standard. To validate the quality of business process model, we are using enterprise architecture quality framework. This framework defines the quality using certains levels, one of which uses the principle of validity with syntactical properness attribute. The syntactical properness attribute was tested through the Formal Petri nets method using WoPed tools. In this study, a case study from a manufacturing company in Indonesia is used as the test object. From the test results, 4 out of 10 business processes that has been tested did not meet the quality standards of the architectural model and improvements were made.
Business Process Reengineering based on Information Economics annastasia, syifa; Suakanto, Sinung; Lubis, Muharman
Sistemasi: Jurnal Sistem Informasi Vol 14, No 5 (2025): Sistemasi: Jurnal Sistem Informasi
Publisher : Program Studi Sistem Informasi Fakultas Teknik dan Ilmu Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32520/stmsi.v14i5.5240

Abstract

Business Process Reengineering (BPR) is a strategic initiative to achieve fundamental improvements in organizational performance. However, research shows that up to 70% of BPR initiatives fail, often due to unclear value delivery and ineffective process redesign. This study aims to address that gap by redesigning the recruitment and selection process using an information economics approach evaluating the value of information to drive better decision making and resource allocation. The research applied process mapping, identification of non-value-adding activities, and value-based analysis at each stage, followed by the integration of digital tools to streamline workflows and improve data accuracy. A case study in a large organization was conducted to test the effectiveness of the redesigned model. The key findings of this study are its greatest strength and must be explicitly highlighted to convey its impact: the redesigned process resulted in a 67.3% reduction in processing time and a Return on Investment (ROI) of 1,085.17% demonstrating not only operational efficiency but also clear financial gain. These outcomes validate the role of information economics in successful BPR and offer a replicable framework for other organizations. By combining BPR with the discipline of information economics, this study offers a replicable, outcome-oriented framework that addresses one of the most common reasons BPR initiatives fail unclear value delivery. This contribution is particularly critical in HR contexts, where decisions are often qualitative and under digitized. The findings provide actionable guidance for organizations seeking to future-proof their HR processes while avoiding the pitfalls that undermine most BPR efforts.
Co-Authors Asti Amalia Nur Fajrillah Muharman Lubis Sinung Suakanto