Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Eksoterisme Tafsir Ishari: Telaah Epistemologi Tafsir Al-Jilani Sansan Ziaul Haq
JOURNAL OF QUR'AN AND HADITH STUDIES Vol 4, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Qur'an and Hadith Academic Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (932.348 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/quhas.v4i1.8786

Abstract

Abstract This article concludes that the sufistic interpretation of al-Ji>la>ni> is in harmony with the principle of textual interpretation. In the process of isha>ri> interpretation, the dialectics between elements of textuality and spirituality makes the text have a literal-objective meaning as well a moral-spiritual significance. This study shows that the interpretation of al-Ji>la>ni> is literal, because it relies in textual meaning, and at the same time is spiritual, in the sense that the meaning also reaches spiritual outcrop. This study is based on interpretive method, with the hermeneutic and sufistic psychology approach. Abstrak Artikel ini menyimpulkan bahwa penafsiran sufistik al-Ji>la>ni> selaras dengan prinsip tekstualitas penafsiran. Dalam proses penafsiran isha>ri>, dialektika antara unsur tekstualitas dan spiritualitas menjadikan teks memiliki makna literal-objektif’ sekaligus signifikansi moral-spiritual. Penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa interpretasi al-Ji>la>ni> bersifat literal, karena mengimani makna tekstual, sekaligus bersifat spiritual, dalam arti bahwa pemaknaan juga menjangkau singkapan spiritual. Dalam melakukan kajian ini, penulis menggunakan metode interpretatif, dengan pendekatan hermeneutika dan psikologi sufistik. Keywords: Penafsiran isha>ri>, Makna tekstual, Signifikansi Moral-Spiritual.
Eksoterisme Tafsir Ishari: Telaah Epistemologi Tafsir Al-Jilani Sansan Ziaul Haq
JOURNAL OF QUR'AN AND HADITH STUDIES Vol 4, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Qur'an and Hadith Academic Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (932.348 KB) | DOI: 10.15408/quhas.v4i1.8785

Abstract

Abstract This article concludes that the sufistic interpretation of al-Ji>la>ni> is in harmony with the principle of textual interpretation. In the process of isha>ri> interpretation, the dialectics between elements of textuality and spirituality makes the text have a literal-objective meaning as well a moral-spiritual significance. This study shows that the interpretation of al-Ji>la>ni> is literal, because it relies in textual meaning, and at the same time is spiritual, in the sense that the meaning also reaches spiritual outcrop. This study is based on interpretive method, with the hermeneutic and sufistic psychology approach. Abstrak Artikel ini menyimpulkan bahwa penafsiran sufistik al-Ji>la>ni> selaras dengan prinsip tekstualitas penafsiran. Dalam proses penafsiran isha>ri>, dialektika antara unsur tekstualitas dan spiritualitas menjadikan teks memiliki makna literal-objektif’ sekaligus signifikansi moral-spiritual. Penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa interpretasi al-Ji>la>ni> bersifat literal, karena mengimani makna tekstual, sekaligus bersifat spiritual, dalam arti bahwa pemaknaan juga menjangkau singkapan spiritual. Dalam melakukan kajian ini, penulis menggunakan metode interpretatif, dengan pendekatan hermeneutika dan psikologi sufistik. Keywords: Penafsiran isha>ri>, Makna tekstual, Signifikansi Moral-Spiritual.
Menyoal Validitas Sadd Al-Dharai‘ sebagai Dalil Hukum Islam: Polemik Epistemologis Ushuliyyin: Questioning the Validity of Sadd Al-Dharai' as an Islamic Legal Argument: Ushuliyyin Epistemological Polemics Sansan Ziaul Haq
ISTIDLAL Vol 3 No 02 (2024): Al-Aqwal: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Fattahul Muluk Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53491/alaqwal.v3i02.1035

Abstract

This paper will discuss the discourse of sadd al-dharai‘  as an evidence of Islamic law along with various epistemological perspectives that underlie the differences of opinion regarding its jurisprudential position. Using the content analysis method and normative-philosophical approach, a qualitative reading of the research data shows that the polemic of ushuliyyin regarding the validity of sadd al-dharai‘  is caused by differences of opinion regarding whether or not it is permissible to judge haram an act that is permissible but can lead to haram based on strong suspicion (dzann). Meanwhile, if this act leads to haram with certainty (bi-al-qat‘i) or with great possibility (ghalabat al-dzann), then almost all the ‘Ulama agree that it is forbidden. This finding strengthens the assumption of the reliability of sadd al-dharai‘ as an Islamic legal argument, because it emphasizes the material-objective aspect of what happens in the field, not the intention of the actor which is difficult to measure definitely. However, further studies are needed to examine the reliability of this legal argument in providing positive and contextual solutions to various contemporary issues.