Handyanto, Shahyb
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Indonesia Sharia Bank Merger Process Reviewed from Business Competition Laws Handyanto, Shahyb; Astuti, Monita Sri; Ajiputra, Kevin Surya
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol 5 No 1 (2021): Legal Certainty and Challenges of Legal Protection Guarantee in Indonesia
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lesrev.v5i1.46288

Abstract

Islamic bank entities in Indonesia, namely BNI Syariah, BRI Syariah, and Bank Syariah Mandiri have merged to become Bank Syariah Indonesia. The merger process was effective on February 1, 2021. As we know, the three banks are state-owned, which have significant assets and have a reasonably large market in Indonesia. In connection with business competition law which seeks to create a fair business competition situation in Indonesia, every corporate action, including merger activities, must be notified to the Business Competition Supervision Commission (hereinafter as KPPU) to assess whether monopolistic practices or unfair business competition have occurred or not. The notification is an effort to supervise every business actor in order to carry out activities that do not violate business competition and do not harm other parties. This study aims to examine normatively the merger process carried out based on business competition law in Indonesia. The research uses materials from both regulations, legal principles, doctrine, and sources related to the subject matter. The data obtained were then analyzed for further analysis to produce conclusions. The results showed that the merger process between the three Islamic banks in Indonesia did not violate the business competition law because it did not occur in a position monopoly and the absence of monopolistic practices.
Problematika Kebijakan Pembelajaran Bauran di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 dalam Memenuhi Hak atas Pendidikan: The Problems of Mixed Learning Policy in the Covid-19 Pandemic Period in Fulfilling the Right to Education Handyanto, Shahyb; Hidayat, Arifin
Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Seminar Nasional Jaminan Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional dan Implementasinya di
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/snhunnes.v7i1.714

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic that hit Indonesia and the world had a significant impact on education. The government has taken a policy by conducting distance learning. However, distance learning creates its problems and in the end, it has violated the constitutional rights of students and has proven ineffective in the transfer of knowledge process. Thus the goal of educating the nation's life becomes constrained. This study aims to examine whether a learning policy that is carried out in a mixed manner (a combination of online and offline) will make the learning process more effective or will it have a negative effect, mainly related to the potential for Covid-19 transmission. The formulation of the problem in this study are: first, how are education policy during the Covid-19 pandemic and the impact of Covid-19 on education in Indonesia. Second, how the learning mix policy can make learning effective or create new problems.
Indonesia Sharia Bank Merger Process Reviewed from Business Competition Laws Handyanto, Shahyb; Astuti, Monita Sri; Ajiputra, Kevin Surya
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol 5 No 1 (2021): Legal Certainty and Challenges of Legal Protection Guarantee in Indonesia
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lesrev.v5i1.46288

Abstract

Islamic bank entities in Indonesia, namely BNI Syariah, BRI Syariah, and Bank Syariah Mandiri have merged to become Bank Syariah Indonesia. The merger process was effective on February 1, 2021. As we know, the three banks are state-owned, which have significant assets and have a reasonably large market in Indonesia. In connection with business competition law which seeks to create a fair business competition situation in Indonesia, every corporate action, including merger activities, must be notified to the Business Competition Supervision Commission (hereinafter as KPPU) to assess whether monopolistic practices or unfair business competition have occurred or not. The notification is an effort to supervise every business actor in order to carry out activities that do not violate business competition and do not harm other parties. This study aims to examine normatively the merger process carried out based on business competition law in Indonesia. The research uses materials from both regulations, legal principles, doctrine, and sources related to the subject matter. The data obtained were then analyzed for further analysis to produce conclusions. The results showed that the merger process between the three Islamic banks in Indonesia did not violate the business competition law because it did not occur in a position monopoly and the absence of monopolistic practices.