Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation
Putra, Erik Nanda
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Analysis of the Teacher-Made Multiple-Choice Tests Quality for Natural Science Subject Putra, Erik Nanda; Syamsurizal, Syamsurizal; Lufri, Lufri; Zulyusri, Zulyusri
Journal of Education Research and Evaluation Vol 5, No 3 (2021)
Publisher : LPPM Undiksha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jere.v5i3.33219

Abstract

This study aims to determine the quality of the questions quantitatively (reliability, discriminating power, difficulty level, and distractor effectiveness). This research is descriptive research. The population in this study were all student answer sheets in the Middle Semester II Science Assessment Exam class VIII SMP Negeri 2 Koto XI Tarusan Academic Year 2020/2021. The sampling technique used total sampling with a sample size of 107 student answer sheets. Data were analyzed using ANATES ver. 4.0.2 program. Based on the research results obtained: 1) reliability of 0.50 with sufficient criteria; 2) the distinguishing power of the bad and good categories which dominates, namely 30% while 25% is moderate and 7.5% is very good; 3) the level of difficulty obtained by the criteria was medium with 62.5%, while the easy questions were 15%, the difficult questions were 12.5% and the very difficult questions were 2.5%; 4) the effectiveness of the distractor, there were 35 items or 87.5% of the effectiveness of the distractor which was functioning properly. Meanwhile, for 5 items, the quality of the distractor does not function or has very poor effectiveness. Thus, it can be concluded that these questions have met the criteria for good questions, but some questions need to be revised.
The Teacher-Made Multiple-Choice Tests Quality for Natural Science Subject Putra, Erik Nanda; Syamsurizal, Syamsurizal; Lufri, Lufri; Zulyusri, Zulyusri
Journal of Education Reseach and Evaluation Vol 5 No 3 (2021): August
Publisher : LPPM Undiksha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (269.347 KB) | DOI: 10.23887/jere.v5i3.33219

Abstract

The questions used as evaluations test the memory aspects of the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains in Bloom's taxonomy which are not optimal. Some science teachers still have difficulty formulating questions, so the instruments developed by teachers are not valid. The research objective is to analyze the quality quantitatively (reliability, discriminatory power, difficulty level, and distractor effectiveness). This study aims to This research is a descriptive study. The population in this study were all student answer sheets on the Science Assessment Exam. The sampling technique used was total sampling with a sample of 107 student answer sheets. Data analysis using ANATES ver. 4.0.2 programs. The results based on the research obtained: 1) reliability of 0.50 with criteria; 2) the distinguishing power of good and bad categories that dominates is 30% while 25% as moderate and 7.5% is very good; 3) the level of difficulty obtained with moderate criteria is 62.5%, easy questions are 15%, difficult questions are 12.5% , and challenging questions are 2.5%; 4) the effectiveness of distractors, there are 35 items or 87.5% of effectiveness distractors that work well. As for the five items, the quality of the distractors does not work, or their effectiveness is terrible. Thus, it can be said that the questions met the criteria well, but some need to be revised.
Co-Authors Abdul Razak Lufri Lufri Ramadhan Sumarmin Syamsurizal - - Zulyusri Zulyusri