p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Novum : Jurnal Hukum
Susilo, Agung Hendro
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS PERATURAN PENGEMBALIAN BARANG BUKTI YANG TIDAK SESUAI DENGAN KEADAAN AWAL WAKTU PENYITAAN Susilo, Agung Hendro; astuti, pudji
NOVUM : JURNAL HUKUM Vol 8 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.2674/novum.v0i0.37320

Abstract

Abstract Handling of confiscated evidence is guided by the law number 8 of 1981 concerning the criminal procedure code and the regulation of the minister of environment and forestry number. P.26/Menlhk/Setjen/Kum.1/4/2017 concerning the handling of evidence of environmental and forestry crime. The two rules do not mention "Evidence" clearly. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal regulations on the return of evidence at the initial time of confiscation so that it shows the suitability of criminal law enforcement actions with the laws that govern it, to find out the responsibility of law enforcement officers for the damage of confiscated evidence so that it is proven as a confiscation error in the criminal law enforcement process.This research is a type of normative or doctrinal legal research to examine the issue of the rule of law in the return of evidence in the form of protected protected birds whose species and numbers are reduced due to the death of the protected animal in the process of handling evidence that has not yet been found to be legal. Errors in handling evidence that result in a mismatch of returning evidence with the initial state of confiscation are reviewed from the principle of legal justice based on existing legal regulations. Keywords : Evidence, legal vacuum, Regulatory Analysis, Criminal Acts, Legal Certainty.
ANALISIS PERATURAN PENGEMBALIAN BARANG BUKTI YANG TIDAK SESUAI DENGAN KEADAAN AWAL WAKTU PENYITAAN: ANALISIS PERATURAN PENGEMBALIAN BARANG BUKTI YANG TIDAK SESUAI DENGAN KEADAAN AWAL WAKTU PENYITAAN Susilo, Agung Hendro; astuti, pudji
NOVUM : JURNAL HUKUM Vol. 8 No. 02 (2021): Novum : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.2674/novum.v0i0.37320

Abstract

Abstract Handling of confiscated evidence is guided by the law number 8 of 1981 concerning the criminal procedure code and the regulation of the minister of environment and forestry number. P.26/Menlhk/Setjen/Kum.1/4/2017 concerning the handling of evidence of environmental and forestry crime. The two rules do not mention "Evidence" clearly. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal regulations on the return of evidence at the initial time of confiscation so that it shows the suitability of criminal law enforcement actions with the laws that govern it, to find out the responsibility of law enforcement officers for the damage of confiscated evidence so that it is proven as a confiscation error in the criminal law enforcement process.This research is a type of normative or doctrinal legal research to examine the issue of the rule of law in the return of evidence in the form of protected protected birds whose species and numbers are reduced due to the death of the protected animal in the process of handling evidence that has not yet been found to be legal. Errors in handling evidence that result in a mismatch of returning evidence with the initial state of confiscation are reviewed from the principle of legal justice based on existing legal regulations. Keywords : Evidence, legal vacuum, Regulatory Analysis, Criminal Acts, Legal Certainty.