Nuraeni, Frasasti Wahyu
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

An An Analysis of Authentic Assessment Implementation in English Speaking Skill of Second Grade Students Syafrizal, Syafrizal; Paharnzah, John; Nuraeni, Frasasti Wahyu
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation Vol 9 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jere.v9i2.38842

Abstract

This paper is a qualitative study which aimed at finding the result of authentic assessment implementation in assessing student English speaking skill. The data were analyzed using content analysis approach. The result of the study showed that the students in their speaking practice got various score in each category. In fluency category, there were five students or 16.67% got 5 score. It meant the student’s fluency and their volume is better. It was smooth and fluid speech. There were few or no hesitations and also there were not attempts to search for words. In pronunciation and accent category, the students who got 5 score was only two students or 7% which their pronunciation is excellent. They had good effort at accent like native. In vocabulary category, the students who got 5 score was 11 students or 37%. It meant their language control was excellent and there was a wide range of well-chosen vocabulary. In grammar category, there were only one student or 3.33% got 5 score. His/her grammatical structures are accuracy and variety. The last category was details which 16 students 53.33% got 5 score. It meant that their level of description was excellent. Additional details information beyond the required included. In the process of conducting evaluation, authentic assessment has big enough influence especially in assessing students’ speaking skill.
AN ANALYSIS OF SLANG LANGUAGE USED IN THE TEENAGER INTERACTION Nuraeni, Frasasti Wahyu; Pahamzah, John
LITERA Vol 20, No 2: LITERA JULI 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/ltr.v20i2.37058

Abstract

Language variation, slang, is one of the recently language uses in mostly teenager interaction. They use this language variation in having various types and reasons. This paper is qualitative studies which aimed at finding and explore the types of slang language used and the reasons of using slang in teenager interaction. It was used as the method to describe a result of a process based on the category that had been determined. The data were collected from document analysis and close ended questionnaire which were analyzed by using interactive model of data analysis: data reduction, data display, and drawing conclusion / verification. The study found that the types of slang language used in teenager interaction showed various result in each types. The first highest result was acronym with the total 33 words or 37.93%. Then, the second was clipping with the total 25 words or 28.75%. Next, the third was fresh and creative with the total 16 words or 18.39%. After that, the fourth was compounding with the total eight words or 9.19%, and the lowest was imitative with the total five words or 5.74%. In line with the result of slang language used types, the result of teenagers’ reason in using slang on their interaction also showed impressive result. There were seven reasons of why the teenagers were using slang language in their interaction. The first highest result was the reason of to enrich the language by inventing new words with the total 15 frequencies or 17.85%. Then, the reason was to induce either friendliness with the total 14 frequencies or 16.70%. Next, the reason were to be different and for easing of social intercourse with the total 13 frequencies or 15.47%. The reasons of to be different and for easing of social intercourse had the same frequencies and percentage in this result. After that, the reason was to reduce seriousness of a conversation with the total 11 frequencies or 13.09%. Next, the reason was just for fun of the thing with the total 10 frequencies or 11.90%, and the last reason was for delights in virtuosity with the total eight frequencies or 9.52%. Keywords: communication, slang types, reason of using slang, and teenager.ANALISIS PENGGUNAAN BAHASA SLANG DALAM INTERAKSI REMAJAAbstrakVariasi bahasa, bahasa gaul, adalah salah satu bahasa yang baru-baru ini digunakan dalam sebagian besar interaksi remaja. Mereka menggunakan variasi bahasa ini karena memiliki berbagai jenis dan alasan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian dengan motode kualitatif yang bertujuan untuk menemukan dan mengeksplorasi jenis-jenis bahasa gaul yang digunakan dan alasan penggunaan bahasa gaul dalam interaksi remaja. Metode kualitatif digunakan sebagai metode untuk mendeskripsikan hasil dari suatu proses berdasarkan kategori yang telah ditentukan. Data diperoleh dari analisis dokumen dan angket tertutup yang dianalisis menggunakan analisis data model interaktif: reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan / verifikasi. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa jenis-jenis bahasa gaul yang digunakan dalam interaksi remaja menunjukkan hasil yang beragam di setiap jenisnya. Hasil tertinggi pertama adalah akronim dengan jumlah 33 kata atau 37,93%. Kemudian yang kedua yaitu kliping dengan total 25 kata atau 28,75%. Berikutnya, yang ketiga yaitu kata baru dan kreatif dengan total 16 kata atau 18,39%. Setelah itu, kata majemuk dengan total delapan kata atau 9,19%, dan yang terendah yaitu kata peniruan dengan total lima kata atau 5,74%. Sejalan dengan hasil penggunaan jenis bahasa gaul, hasil alasan remaja dalam menggunakan bahasa gaul di interaksinya juga menunjukkan hasil yang mengesankan. Ada tujuh alasan mengapa para remaja tersebut menggunakan bahasa gaul dalam interaksi mereka. Alasan yang pertama adalah untuk memperkaya bahasa dengan menemukan kata-kata baru sebanyak 15 frekuensi atau 17,85%. Kemudian alasan yang kedua untuk menginduksi keramahan dengan total 14 frekuensi atau 16.70%. Selanjutnya, alasan yang ketiga agar berbeda dan untuk memudahkan pergaulan dengan total 13 frekuensi atau 15,47%. Sejalan dengan hasil penggunaan jenis bahasa gaul, hasil alasan remaja dalam menggunakan bahasa gaul di interaksinya juga menunjukkan hasil yang mengesankan. Alasan untuk menjadi berbeda dan untuk memudahkan pergaulan memiliki frekuensi dan persentase yang sama pada hasil ini. Setelah itu, alasan berikutnya untuk mengurangi keseriusan percakapan dengan total 11 frekuensi atau 13,09%. Selanjutnya, hanya untuk bersenang-senang dengan total 10 frekuensi atau 11,90%, dan yang terakhir adalah kesenangan dalam virtuositas dengan total delapan frekuensi atau 9,52%. Kata kunci: komunikasi, tipe-tipe bahasa gaul, alasan penggunaan bahasa gaul, dan remaja.
An An Analysis of Authentic Assessment Implementation in English Speaking Skill of Second Grade Students Syafrizal, Syafrizal; Paharnzah, John; Nuraeni, Frasasti Wahyu
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation Vol 9 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jere.v9i2.38842

Abstract

This paper is a qualitative study which aimed at finding the result of authentic assessment implementation in assessing student English speaking skill. The data were analyzed using content analysis approach. The result of the study showed that the students in their speaking practice got various score in each category. In fluency category, there were five students or 16.67% got 5 score. It meant the student’s fluency and their volume is better. It was smooth and fluid speech. There were few or no hesitations and also there were not attempts to search for words. In pronunciation and accent category, the students who got 5 score was only two students or 7% which their pronunciation is excellent. They had good effort at accent like native. In vocabulary category, the students who got 5 score was 11 students or 37%. It meant their language control was excellent and there was a wide range of well-chosen vocabulary. In grammar category, there were only one student or 3.33% got 5 score. His/her grammatical structures are accuracy and variety. The last category was details which 16 students 53.33% got 5 score. It meant that their level of description was excellent. Additional details information beyond the required included. In the process of conducting evaluation, authentic assessment has big enough influence especially in assessing students’ speaking skill.