Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

STRENGTHENING REGULATION OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT (DRONE) THROUGH LAW Al Huda, Mukhlis
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1019.571 KB) | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v2i2.19

Abstract

The development of science and technology has brought the world into the Revolution Industrial 4.0. The Industrial Revolution is marked by artificial intelligence, robotics, ecommerce, nanotechnology, automatic cars, and other innovations. Technological innovations in the world of aviation are unmanned aircraft that have begun to be used for various civilian to military purposes. Observing the increasingly massive use and utilization of unmanned aircraft, the Indonesian government through the Ministry of Transportation has issued a Regulation of the Minister of Transportation Number PM 180 of the Year concerning Control of Operation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Airspace Served by Indonesia and renewed by Regulation of the Minister of Transportation Number PM 47 Year 2016 concerning Amendments to the Regulation of the Minister of Transportation Number PM 180 of 2015 concerning Control of Operation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Airspace Served by Indonesia. Apart from having a positive impact on civilian and military activities, unmanned aircraft also have a negative impact because they are used for crimes ranging from reconnaissance, drug delivery to theoreticalism. In the Permenhub which regulates unmanned aircraft there is only administrative sanction, therefore there must be a strengthening of the regulation of unmanned aircraft which contains criminal sanctions through the Law
Politik Hukum Yudisial dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja) Kurniawan, Yodi Achmad; Al Huda, Mukhlis
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 6 No 2 (2022): Desember 2022
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v6i2.4013

Abstract

AbstrakBagaimana Politik Hukum Yudisial dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 tentang Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja, yang dalam Amar Putusannya menetapkan bahwa Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2020 (Selanjutnya disebut UU Cipta Kerja) dalam Pokok Permohonan menyatakan pembentukan Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 dan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum mengikat secara bersyarat sepanjang tidak dimaknai “tidak dilakukan perbaikan dalam waktu 2 (dua) tahun sejak putusan ini diucapkan (Inkonstitutional bersyarat). Hasil putusan MK tersebut telah banyak menuai pro-kontra dimasyarakat terlebih setelah putusan MK tersebut beberapa pengajuan Uji formil maupun materil yang diajukan kepada MK namun hampir semua perkara tersebut diputus tidak dapat diterima dengan alasan telah kehilangan objek, karena Putusan MK Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 telah menetapkan Undang-Undang No. 11 tahun 2020 inkonstitusional bersyarat.Kata Kunci: Politik Hukum Yudisial, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, Pembangunan Hukum Nasional