Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Gejayan Memanggil: Social Solidarity in the Social Movement of the Digital Age Zufar, Biko Nabih Fikri; Airlangga, Sinergy Aditya
KOMUNITAS: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture Vol 13, No 2 (2021): September 2021
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/komunitas.v13i2.29562

Abstract

Many things change in society as a result of being influenced by technology, one of which is social movements. Increasingly sophisticated technology can drive or present social movements in society. Based on these conditions, this article examines the existence of technology that can produce a social movement in society. In addition, this article uses social solidarity theory; mechanical and organic Durkheim, with a view to seeing the solidarity that appears in social movements in the digital era. This article uses a qualitative research method with a narrative research approach. The result is that social movements in the digital era only prioritize mechanical solidarity, without ensuring equal distribution of awareness of the individuals or groups involved. On the other hand, a social movement in the digital era requires organic solidarity to be able to maximize the goals of social movements.
Gejayan Memanggil: Social Solidarity in the Social Movement of the Digital Age Zufar, Biko Nabih Fikri; Airlangga, Sinergy Aditya
Komunitas Vol 13, No 2 (2021): September 2021
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/komunitas.v13i2.29562

Abstract

Many things change in society as a result of being influenced by technology, one of which is social movements. Increasingly sophisticated technology can drive or present social movements in society. Based on these conditions, this article examines the existence of technology that can produce a social movement in society. In addition, this article uses social solidarity theory; mechanical and organic Durkheim, with a view to seeing the solidarity that appears in social movements in the digital era. This article uses a qualitative research method with a narrative research approach. The result is that social movements in the digital era only prioritize mechanical solidarity, without ensuring equal distribution of awareness of the individuals or groups involved. On the other hand, a social movement in the digital era requires organic solidarity to be able to maximize the goals of social movements.
Neoliberalism, Governance, & Capital Accumulation: A Study of Development Debates and Social Dynamics in Indonesia Airlangga, Sinergy Aditya
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 28, No 2 (2024): November
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.89592

Abstract

Governance is a concept for the development of good government management. On the one hand, this concept seems to be a new breakthrough in providing public services and regional development. On the other hand, the concept of governance is said to be a concept that drives the neoliberal agenda for market development. The impact of this often causes environmental damage, social conflict and inequality. This article aims to portray the government development debate and social dynamics occurring in Indonesia. Theoretically, this article shows the debate about understanding the concept of governance and the various views that accompany it. Empirically, instead of the governance view being said to encourage improvements in public services with social development, it actually encourages market access for the benefit of capital accumulation in Indonesia. This article seeks to answer three basic questions. First, how does neoliberalism shape the concept of governance; Second, how does the concept of governance encourage capital accumulation; and Third, how development debates shape social dynamics in Indonesia. This paper uses a desk study by collecting several secondary manuscripts and tends to focus closely on theoretical debates. In the end, this article wants to conclude an argument that governance practices are closely related to the neoliberalism agenda which actually encourages opening up market access and wider capital flows. Such conditions will become a new problem in the development of community welfare.
Neoliberalism, Governance, & Capital Accumulation: A Study of Development Debates and Social Dynamics in Indonesia Airlangga, Sinergy Aditya
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 28, No 2 (2024): November
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.89592

Abstract

Governance is a concept for the development of good government management. On the one hand, this concept seems to be a new breakthrough in providing public services and regional development. On the other hand, the concept of governance is said to be a concept that drives the neoliberal agenda for market development. The impact of this often causes environmental damage, social conflict and inequality. This article aims to portray the government development debate and social dynamics occurring in Indonesia. Theoretically, this article shows the debate about understanding the concept of governance and the various views that accompany it. Empirically, instead of the governance view being said to encourage improvements in public services with social development, it actually encourages market access for the benefit of capital accumulation in Indonesia. This article seeks to answer three basic questions. First, how does neoliberalism shape the concept of governance; Second, how does the concept of governance encourage capital accumulation; and Third, how development debates shape social dynamics in Indonesia. This paper uses a desk study by collecting several secondary manuscripts and tends to focus closely on theoretical debates. In the end, this article wants to conclude an argument that governance practices are closely related to the neoliberalism agenda which actually encourages opening up market access and wider capital flows. Such conditions will become a new problem in the development of community welfare.