Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Notaire Jurnal Tunas Agraria
Sahetapy, Prilly Priscilia
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Status Hukum PPJB Berupa Tanah Belum Dipecah yang Dijaminkan Serta Penyelesaiannya Untuk Melindungi Pembeli Dalam Perkara Kepailitan (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 395 K/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2024) Sahetapy, Prilly Priscilia; Irna Nurhayati
Notaire Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v8i3.73756

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the legal status of PPJB objects in the form of land that has not been divided in bankruptcy cases according to Indonesian law (Study of Commercial Court Decision Number 28 / Pdt.Sus-Other Claims / PN Niaga Jkt.Pst jo. Supreme Court Decision Number 395 K / Pdt.Sus-Pailit / 2024) and to determine and analyze the settlement of PPJB objects after the Supreme Court Decision Number 395 K / Pdt. Sus-Pailit / 2024 to protect the rights of buyers in bankruptcy cases. This research is descriptive and normative. The main data is secondary data obtained based on library research on laws and regulations, supported by interviews with informants. The method of collecting research data is a documentary study with research tools in the form of written materials and direct communication with research tools in the form of interview guidelines. Then, the research data are analyzed qualitatively and concluded using the deductive method. The results of the study are that the legal status of the PPJB object in the form of land that has not been divided and has been pledged in a bankruptcy case according to Indonesian law is valid because the PPJB is a preliminary agreement when there are obligations that have not been fulfilled to make an AJB, such as dividing the land. The District Court Decision stated that the PPJB object was not listed in the developer's bankruptcy estate list, so it did not consider the PPJB, while the Supreme Court Decision stated that the PPJB was valid because the buyers had acted in good faith. Then, the settlement of the PPJB object after the Supreme Court Decision to protect the buyer's rights in the bankruptcy case was carried out by removing the land and housing units that were the object of the case from the bankruptcy estate list. The next stage is the debtor's debt repayment, partial repayment application, division of building rights title, making AJB, changing names, requesting changes in building use rights to ownership rights, and issuing ownership rights certificates in the names of the buyers. Keywords: Sales and Purchase Agreement, the division of building rights title, settlement of the verdict
Pendaftaran hak tanggungan sebelum dan setelah berlakunya Peraturan Menteri Agraria/Kepala BPN Nomor 5 Tahun 2020 Pangesti, Shinta; Sahetapy, Prilly Priscilia
Tunas Agraria Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): Tunas Agraria
Publisher : Diploma IV Pertanahan Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31292/jta.v6i2.216

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare HT registration before and after the implementation of Permen ATR/KBPN 5/2020 and legal protection for creditors in implementing HT-el registration. This research is normative-empirical with a legal systematic approach and examines the data with qualitative analysis. The results of the study show that there are 7 aspects of comparison: first, the parties that play a role in conventional HT are PPAT, Land Office, and debtors, while in HT-el, they are PPAT, Land Office, and creditors. Second, the HT registration method, conventional with physical interaction, and HT-el with an electronic system Third, HT registration requirements document, conventional with original and photocopy, HT-el with original scan and upload Fourth, the HT registration PNBP rate is in accordance with the provisions in PP 128/2015. Fifth, HT registration time, conventional on working days and hours, HT-el at any time Sixth, HT registration results, conventionally typed on paper, are issued electronically. Seventh, royal HT, conventional with physical interaction and acquisition of paper documents, and HT-el with electronic systems and electronic documents Then, the legal protection for creditors in the registration of conventional HT and HT-el is the same, namely through an HT certificate, which has executive powers.   Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk membandingkan pendaftaran HT sebelum dan sesudah pemberlakuan Permen ATR/KBPN 5/2020 serta perlindungan hukum bagi kreditur dalam penerapan pendaftaran HT-el. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif-empiris dengan pendekatan sistematika hukum serta mengkaji data-data dengan analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat 7 aspek perbandingan, pertama, para pihak yang berperan dalam HT konvensional adalah PPAT, Kantor Pertanahan, dan debitur, sedangkan dalam HT-el adalah PPAT, Kantor Pertanahan, dan kreditur. Kedua, metode pendaftaran HT, konvensional dengan interaksi fisik, HT-el dengan sistem elektronik. Ketiga, dokumen persyaratan pendaftaran HT, konvensional dengan asli dan fotocopy, HT-el dengan scan dan unggah asli. Keempat, tarif PNBP pendaftaran HT adalah sesuai pengaturan dalam PP 128/2015. Kelima, waktu pendaftaran HT, konvensional pada hari dan jam kerja, HT-el kapan saja. Keenam, hasil pendaftaran HT, konvensional diketik di kertas, HT-el diterbitkan secara elektronik. Ketujuh, roya HT, konvensional dengan interaksi fisik dan perolehan dokumen kertas, HT-el dengan sistem elektronik dan dokumen elektronik. Kemudian, perlindungan hukum bagi kreditur dalam pendaftaran HT konvensional dan HT-el adalah sama, yaitu melalui sertipikat HT yang memiliki kekuatan eksekutorial.
Co-Authors Irna Nurhayati Pangesti, Shinta