Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Life satisfaction is the most significant determinant of quality of life in the elderly Vinsalia, Thania; Handajani, Yvonne Suzy
Universa Medicina Vol. 40 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18051/UnivMed.2021.v40.14-22

Abstract

BackgroundQuality of life tends to decrease as age increases. This study aimed to determine the most significant risk factors (family support, spirituality, and life satisfaction) for the elderly’s quality of life. MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study of 101 subjects aged ³60 years in West Jakarta. The variables were assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life–BREF (WHOQOL–BREF), Family Support, Daily Spiritual Experience Scale (DSES), and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) instruments. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the association between quality of life and its determinant factors.ResultsBased on sociodemographic characteristics, the respondents were mostly women (66.3%), had more than nine years of education (79.2%), and were married (56.4%). The analysis showed that life satisfaction was significantly associated with overall quality of life (OR=9.71; 95% CI:2.04–46.26; p=0.004) and general health (OR=7.52; 95% CI:1.70–33.25; p=0.008). Life satisfaction was also a risk factor for the environmental domain (OR=36.02; 95% CI:5.07–255.82; p<0.001). Furthermore, spirituality was found to be a risk factor for the physical health domain (OR=4.18; 95% CI:1.51–11.59; p=0.006), psychological domain (OR=6.67; 95% CI:2.4–17.86; p<0.001), and environmental domain (OR=11.46; 95% CI:3.10–42.37; p<0.001).ConclusionLife satisfaction plays a significant role in increasing the environmental domain of quality of life, the overall quality of life, and general health among the elderly. Awareness of these factors can assist providers in identifying people at risk and guide new intervention programs to improve care for these invaluable elderly of our communities.
Safety and Clinical Outcomes of Intravenous-to-Oral Antibiotic Switch Therapy in Patients with Brain Abscess: A Systematic Review Sucipto; Vinsalia, Thania; Etania, Katheryn
Acta Neurologica Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Acta Neurologica Indonesia
Publisher : Departemen Neurologi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69868/ani.v4i3.141

Abstract

Background: Brain abscess requires prolonged intravenous (IV) antibiotics, but early transition-to-oral-switch (IVOS) therapy may reduce hospital stay and healthcare burden. Evidence on safety, efficacy, and timing remains limited. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Central, ScienceDirect, and Taylor & Francis identified 67 studies; four met inclusion criteria, including 542 patients. Data on demographics, IV and oral antibiotic regimens, therapy duration, clinical outcomes, and adverse events were extracted. Results: Patients were predominantly male (63–83.5%). IV antibiotics included β-lactams, metronidazole, thiophenicol, aminoglycosides, and penicillin derivatives, lasting 5–28 days. Oral regimens included fluoroquinolones, amoxicillin, rifampicin, clindamycin, cotrimoxazole, and nitroimidazoles. Total antibiotic duration ranged 36–140 days. IVOS was performed early (≤10 days) in 57% of patients in one study and after stabilization in others. Favorable outcomes (GOS 4–5) occurred in 61–82%. Mortality ranged 12–18.1%, mainly in severe cases. No abscess recurrence was reported at six months. Adverse events, mostly mild cytopenias, occurred in 25–76%; few required therapy modification. Early IVOS was associated with shorter hospitalization and fewer surgical revisions but was not an independent predictor of outcome. Discussion: IVOS can be safely implemented in selected patients with brain abscess, potentially reducing hospital stay and healthcare costs. However, heterogeneity in timing and patient selection highlights the need for standardized protocol. GCS at admission and comorbidities remain the most important prognostic factors. Conclusion: IVOS appears safe and effective, with potential additional benefits from early switch. Further research is needed to determine optimal timing and patient selection.