Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DiH : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Giri Santosa, Dewa Gede
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PERJANJIAN KERJA WAKTU TERTENTU PASCA UNDANG-UNDANG CIPTA KERJA: IMPLEMENTASI DAN PERMASALAHANNYA Giri Santosa, Dewa Gede
DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Volume 17 Nomor 2 Agustus 2021
Publisher : Doctor of Law Study Program Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/dih.v17i2.4657

Abstract

After Law No. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation has been enacted, there are several changes regarding the provisions related to fixed-term employment agreements previously regulated in Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower. Law No. 11 of 2020 experienced rejection from many workers because there were several changes to the provisions regarding fixed-term employment agreements which were feared to cause problems in its implementation. One of them is related to changes in the provisions regarding the period of time for a fixed-term employment agreement which is determined by the employment agreement itself and is not limited by law. This research uses normative legal research methods. The results of the analysis show that there have been several changes related to the regulations regarding fixed-term employment agreements in Law No. 11 of 2020 and with these changes, there are still some problems and legal voids in several provisions, thus the government should issue government regulations and/or other implementing regulations deemed necessary to address these problems. Keywords: employment agreement; fixed-term employment agreement; job creation law Abstrak Setelah diundangkannya Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja, terdapat beberapa perubahan mengenai ketentuan-ketentuan terkait perjanjian kerja waktu tertentu yang sebelumnya diatur dalam Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan. Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja kemudian mengalami penolakan dari banyak pekerja karena terdapat beberapa perubahan ketentuan mengenai perjanjian kerja waktu tertentu yang dikhawatirkan akan menimbulkan permasalahan dalam implementasinya. Salah satunya adalah terkait perubahan ketentuan tentang jangka waktu untuk dapat dilakukan perjanjian kerja waktu tertentu yang lamanya ditentukan oleh perjanjian kerja dan tidak diatur mengenai batas maksimalnya dalam undang-undang. Penelitian hukum ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil dari analisa menunjukkan bahwa terdapat beberapa perubahan terkait aturan-aturan mengenai perjanjian kerja waktu tertentu dalam Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja dan terhadap perubahan-perubahan tersebut masih ditemukan beberapa permasalahan serta kekosongan hukum pada beberapa ketentuan, sehingga pemerintah patut menerbitkan peraturan pemerintah dan/atau peraturan pelaksana lainnya yang dianggap perlu untuk menangani permasalahan tersebut.
ACQUISITION AND PRESENTATION OF DIGITAL EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL TRIAL IN INDONESIA Giri Santosa, Dewa Gede; Ibnu Kamali, Karell Mawla
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.2.2022.195-218

Abstract

Digital evidence is not included in the types of evidence as stipulated in Article 184 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, but is regulated in Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions as amended by Law No. 19 of 2016. However, it is often found that the submission of digital evidence is not only for criminal cases related to electronic information and transactions, but also for criminal cases that are not regulated in the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions. Furthermore, distinct characteristics of digital evidence compared to evidence in general require different acquisition and presentation method. Hence the writers intends to examine the method of acquisition and presentation of digital evidence in criminal trial and how judges evaluate digital evidence by examining how it was obtained and presented to the trial. This research is normative legal research, where the data sources include research on legal principles, legal system, and legal comparison. From the research, it was concluded that Indonesia already has laws and regulations governing the expansion of evidence to include digital evidence, Indonesia also has rules regarding the method of acquisition and presentation of digital evidence in the criminal trial. Therefore, judges are required to be able to evaluate the validity of digital evidence by observing the method of acquisition and presentation of digital evidence in the criminal trial based on applicable laws.
Co-Authors Ibnu Kamali, Karell Mawla