Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Pengaruh Outlet Atmosphere dan Pelayanan Gerai terhadap Pembelian Implusif pada Gerai dalam Lippo Plaza Kota Kendari Muhammad Rizaldi Makmur Rizaldi Makmur; Alasman Mpesau
Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Februari 2020, Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH)
Publisher : LP3M Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51454/jimsh.v2i1.28

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji dan menganalisis secara empiris pengaruh atmosphere dan pelayanan gerai terhadap pembelian impulsif pada gerai dalam Lippo Plaza Kendari. Penelitian ini bersifat explanatory yang bermaksud menjelaskan kedudukan variabel-variabel yang diteliti serta hubungan dan pengaruh antara satu variabel dengan variabel lain. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Variabel atmosphere gerai dan pelayanan gerai berpengaruh positif terhadap pembelian impulsif pada gerai Lippo Plaza Kendari. Karena itu, hipotesis penelitian yang diajukan dapat diterima; (2) Variabel atmosphere gerai dan pelayanan gerai berpengaruh secara parsial terhadap pembelian impuls konsumen pada gerai Lippo Plaza Kendari; dan (3) Variabel pelayanan gerai merupakan variabel yang dominan mempengaruhi pembelian impuls pada gerai Lippo Plaza Kendari.

STUDI TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KEHUTANAN DALAM PENEBANGAN HUTAN DILUAR RENCANA KERJA TAHUNAN PADA PEMILIK IZIN USAHA PEMANFAATAN HASIL HUTAN KAYU Alasman Mpesau
Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): Januari 2021
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

The problems in this study is deforestation outside the Annual Work Plan (RKT) on Timber Product Utilization Business License owner (IUPHHK) as acts against forestry administration law based on article 74 Government Role Number 6 of 2007. However, if it is viewed from its effect on the destruction of forest which is done without planning, logging area map, work target in Annual Work Plan (RKT) can destruct the forest. This research is a descriptive analysis which describe the problems in this research, then the analysis is carried out based on the principles of criminal law and forestry legislation. Deforestation acts outside the Annual Work Plan (RKT) on Timber Product Utilization Business License owner (IUPHHK) is forestry criminal law based on Article 50 Chapter (2) of Law Number 41 of 1999 of forestry. It becaused permission of the forest cultivation is in only refers to certain area. Therefore, if it is done outside the mentioned area, it is categorized as illegal logging and it can destruct the forest.

KEWENANGAN BADAN PENGAWAS PEMILU DALAM PENANGANAN PELANGGARAN ADMINISTRASI DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF SISTEM PERADILAN INDONESIA Alasman Mpesau
Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Mei 2021
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

In the General Election and Regional Head Election Law, the Election Supervisory Board (Bawaslu) has the authority supervisory to each Election stages, it is the center for law enforcement activities of the Election (Sentra Gakkumdu) to criminal acts and carrying out the judicial functions for investigating, examining, and decided on administrative disputes of General Election and Regional Head Election. With the Bawaslu’s authority then placed as a super-body institution in the ranks of the Election Management Body, due to its essential role in building a clean and credible electoral system, it also has potential for abuse of power within it. In Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power has defined state institutions that have the authority to administrate judicial functions. These are the Supreme Court and Judicial Bodies that under its lines of general court, Religious Courts, Military Courts, Administrative Court (PTUN) and the Constitutional Court. The research method is normative juridical, that focuses on the analysis of the laws and regulations on General Election, Regional Head Elections and the Law on Judicial Power. The analytical tool is descriptive analysis, by describing the main issues, an analysis is carried out that was supported by case-approach related to the research. The study concludes that Bawaslu in carrying out judicial functions in its position as a semi-judicial institution has not a hierarchical relationship to the Supreme Court (MA) and the Constitutional Court (MK); however, what does exist is functional relationship.

DISKURSUS ATAS MANTAN TERPIDANA SEBAGAI CALON KEPALA DAERAH Alasman Mpesau
Jurnal Hukum Saraswati Vol 6 No 1 (2024): JHS MARET 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Mahasaraswati University, Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36733/jhshs.v6i1.8814

Terhadap calon kepala daerah, yang statusnya sebagai mantan terpidana dan sedang menjadi terpidana, sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku dalam Pasal 7 Ayat (2) huruf (g) UU 10/2016 tentang Pemilihan Kepala Daerah, dan diatur secara rinci pelaksanaannya pada Pasal (4) ayat (1) huruf (f) dan ayat (2a) PKPU 1/2020 tentang Pencalonan Kepala Daerah dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 56/PUU-XVII/2019. Namun oleh Penyelenggara Pemilu pada Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) Kabupaten memperbolehkan calon kepala daerah tersebut berstatus terpidana. Kasus ini terjadi di Kabupaten Boven Digoel Provinsi Papua. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan cara mendalami studi dokumen dengan menggunakan berbagai data sekunder seperti Undang-undang, putusan pengadilan, teori hukum, dan beberapa pendekatan mainstream yang biasa digunakan dalam kajian hukum normatif. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah seorang mantan narapidana korupsi yang belum menjalani hukuman selama 5 tahun setelah keluar dari lembaga pemasyarakatan tidak memenuhi syarat untuk menjadi calon kepala daerah, sehingga harus didiskualifikasi dari peserta pemilihan kepala daerah. Begitu juga dengan status terpidana juga tidak memenuhi syarat untuk calon kepala daerah sehingga harus didiskualifikasi.

Transformasi Elektronika Digital dalam Penghitungan dan Rekapitulasi Suara Pemilu/Pilkada: Analisis Eksistensi Sistem di Persidangan Perselisihan Hasil di Mahkamah Konstitusi Mpesau, Alasman
Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): February, Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH)
Publisher : LP3M, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51454/jimsh.v6i1.446

This study examines the use of digital electronic systems in General-Regional Elections as evidence in the Constitutional Court's dispute over Vote Counting Results. Focusing on the Rekapitulasi Information System (SIREKAP), the research explores the existence and evidential strength of SIREKAP as a mandatory administrative action during the electoral process. In the context of normative law, this research utilizes primary and secondary data related to electoral laws and relevant legal materials. Through observation and documentation methods, the data is analyzed by organizing, sorting, and categorizing information. The study demonstrates that SIREKAP has a legal basis in the Regulation of the General Election Commission, making it a legally accountable piece of evidence. This normative legal research contributes significantly to understanding the role of digital electronic systems in General-Regional Elections in the context of evidentiary support during PHPU in the MK. The results are expected to provide insights into the role of SIREKAP as an instrument supporting transparency and accountability in democracy, particularly in addressing the complexity and challenges of managing General Elections/Regional Elections.

Visibility of the Death Penalty in Indonesia: From Levy to Restoration Adianto Adianto; Hariman Satria; Alasman Mpesau
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 001 (2023): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i3.5049

In Indonesia, the death penalty is regulated in Article 10 letter a number 1 of the old Criminal Code and is placed as the main crime. The death penalty is a classic criminal law product which emphasizes that punishment must contain retribution or appropriate reward. Meanwhile, after the new Criminal Code was passed, the death penalty was made more flexible. There is a kind of paradigm shift in punishment from the old Criminal Code which was retaliatory in nature to the new Criminal Code which is restorative and rehabilitative in nature. The death penalty is made a special punishment and is threatened alternatively with other types of punishment, for example imprisonment for 20 years or life imprisonment. The death penalty can also be carried out through a probationary period.

Keadilan Hukum Atas Pemberian Amnesti Dan Abolisi Terhadap Terpidana Korupsi Di Indonesia Mpesau, Alasman
Legal Advice Jurnal Hukum Vol 2 No 4 (2025): Legal Advice Journal Of Law
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51454/paazgw59

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh perdebatan mengenai keadilan hukum dalam pemberian amnesti dan abolisi terhadap terpidana korupsi di Indonesia. Korupsi sebagai kejahatan luar biasa berdampak pada stabilitas politik, ekonomi, serta pemenuhan hak asasi manusia, sehingga pengampunan bagi pelakunya dinilai bertentangan dengan prinsip persamaan di hadapan hukum dan rule of law. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis kewenangan prerogatif Presiden dalam pemberian amnesti dan abolisi pada kasus korupsi serta menilai kesesuaiannya dengan konsep keadilan hukum. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif melalui kajian peraturan perundang-undangan dan literatur, penelitian menemukan bahwa pemberian amnesti atau abolisi bagi koruptor tidak memiliki legitimasi keadilan karena melemahkan kepastian hukum, menimbulkan impunitas, dan mengikis kepercayaan publik. Dari perspektif hukum internasional, korupsi termasuk pelanggaran hak ekonomi dan sosial sehingga pengampunan terhadap koruptor bertentangan dengan norma antimpunitas global. Karena itu, pemberian amnesti dan abolisi harus ditolak demi menjaga integritas hukum dan keadilan substantif.

Transformasi Elektronika Digital dalam Penghitungan dan Rekapitulasi Suara Pemilu/Pilkada: Analisis Eksistensi Sistem di Persidangan Perselisihan Hasil di Mahkamah Konstitusi Mpesau, Alasman
Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): February, Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH)
Publisher : LP3M, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51454/jimsh.v6i1.446

This study examines the use of digital electronic systems in General-Regional Elections as evidence in the Constitutional Court's dispute over Vote Counting Results. Focusing on the Rekapitulasi Information System (SIREKAP), the research explores the existence and evidential strength of SIREKAP as a mandatory administrative action during the electoral process. In the context of normative law, this research utilizes primary and secondary data related to electoral laws and relevant legal materials. Through observation and documentation methods, the data is analyzed by organizing, sorting, and categorizing information. The study demonstrates that SIREKAP has a legal basis in the Regulation of the General Election Commission, making it a legally accountable piece of evidence. This normative legal research contributes significantly to understanding the role of digital electronic systems in General-Regional Elections in the context of evidentiary support during PHPU in the MK. The results are expected to provide insights into the role of SIREKAP as an instrument supporting transparency and accountability in democracy, particularly in addressing the complexity and challenges of managing General Elections/Regional Elections.

Tinjauan Hukum terhadap Putusan Bawaslu atas Dugaan Penggunaan Ijazah Palsu dalam Pencalonan DPRD Kota Kendari pada Pemilu 2024 Ruslan, Ruslan; Dagani, Gamlan; Mpesau, Alasman
Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): February, Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH)
Publisher : LP3M, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51454/jimsh.v7i1.1019

ABSTRACT: The Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) has the authority to receive, examine, assess, and decide on administrative violations in elections, including allegations of using fraudulent diplomas during the candidacy process for members of district/city regional legislative councils (DPRD). This study aims to review Koreki Bawaslu RI Decision No. 029/KS/ADM/PL/BWSL/00.00/V/2024, which upheld the Decision of Bawaslu Kota Kendari No. 001/LP/ADM.PL/BWSL.KOTA/28.01/IV/2024, stating that the Kendari City General Election Commission (KPU) had carried out the DPRD candidacy process in accordance with electoral administrative procedures and mechanisms. However, the Directorate of Community and Special Education of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia, through Letter No. 1429/C6/GT.03.03/2024 dated May 10, 2024, indicated that the DPRD Kendari City candidate, identified as LA or LR, was not registered as a participant in the 2008 National Equivalency Examination, which implies that the candidate was not entitled to possess an equivalency Package C diploma. This study employs a normative juridical method to analyze the legal basis of the decision. The findings reveal that Bawaslu Kota Kendari made errors in its legal considerations when ruling on the alleged administrative electoral violation regarding the use of a fraudulent diploma by the Kendari City DPRD candidate.

IMPLICATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT'S DECISION ON THE SEPARATION OF NATIONAL AND LOCAL ELECTIONS FOR INDONESIAN ELECTION LAW POLITICS Alasman Mpesau; Ruslan
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20322944

Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024 separates national and local elections with a specific time interval, having implications for the Indonesian electoral system and electoral law policy. This study aims to normatively analyze the impact of this decision on the principle of election simultaneity, transition of terms of office, and future electoral law design. The method used is normative legal research with a legislative approach, case studies, conceptual and comparative studies of the democratic transitions of Germany and South Africa. The results show that Constitutional Court Decision 135 reflects the approach of judicial activism and living constitution, and does not conflict with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This separation of elections requires legal reform through harmonization of the Election Law and Regional Elections with an Omnibus Law approach. In addition, it is necessary to refine the electoral system towards a mixed-member proportional model to be more representative and democratic. This decision is an important foundation for reforming electoral law politics that is constitutional, adaptive, and responsive to the dynamics of Indonesian democracy.

Title

Found 12 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 12 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 12 Documents
Search