Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PENGARUH BUDAYA ORGANISASI DAN KEPEMIMPINAN TRANSFORMASIONAL TERHADAP KOMITMEN ORGANISASI MELALUI MOTIVASI KERJA SEBAGAI VARIABEL MEDIASI (Studi Empirik Pegawai Pada Pesantren Ibnu Taimiyah Bogor) Suhendi, Suhendi; Entang, Mohammad; Tukiran, Martinus
MAGMA : JURNAL MAGISTER MANAJEMEN Vol 5, No 1 (2023): Edisi Mei
Publisher : Universitas Pakuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of Organizational Culture and Transformational Leadership on organizational commitment through the mediation of work motivation. The study population was 144 employees at the Ibnu Taimiyah Islamic Boarding School in Bogor and a sample of 106 employees. Data collection for each variable studied used a questionnaire with an assessment scale. Data analysis techniques using descriptive statistical analysis techniques and path analysis techniques (path analysis). The results showed: (a) There is a direct influence between organizational culture on work motivation with a regression coefficient value of β = 0.875, (b) There is a direct influence between transformational leadership on work motivation with a regression coefficient value of β = 0.035, (c). There is a direct influence between organizational culture on organizational commitment with a regression coefficient value of β = 0.421, (d). There is a direct influence between transformational leadership on organizational commitment and the value of the regression coefficient of β = 0.268, (e). There is a direct influence between work motivation and organizational commitment and the value of the regression coefficient of β = 0.303, (f). There is an indirect influence between organizational culture on organizational commitment through work motivation with a zhitung value greater than ztabel or 2,171 1.96. Then it can be concluded that work motivation mediates the indirect influence between organizational culture on organizational commitment, and (g). There is an indirect influence between transformational leadership on organizational commitment through work motivation with a zhitung value smaller than ztabel or 0,565 1.96. So it can be concluded that work motivation mediates the indirect influence between transformational leadership and organizational commitment.
The Relationship between Work Motivation, Work Discipline and Employee Performance at the Regional Secretariat of Bogor City Maryani, Yani; Entang, Mohammad; Tukiran, Martinus
International Journal of Social and Management Studies Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): International Journal of Social and Management Studies (IJOSMAS)
Publisher : IJOSMAS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (459.91 KB) | DOI: 10.5555/ijosmas.v2i2.14

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between work motivation and work discipline with employee performance in the Regional Secretariat of Bogor City. The study population was 158 non-leadership employees with ASN status in the Regional Secretariat of Bogor City with 114 non-leadership employees with ASN status calculated using the Slovin formula with an error rate of 5%. Collecting data for each variable studied using a questionnaire with a rating scale. The data analysis technique used descriptive statistical analysis techniques and inferential statistical analysis techniques. The results showed: (a) There is a positive and significant relationship between work motivation and employee performance indicated by the correlation coefficient ry.1 = 0.531 with the degree of strength of the relationship "medium" and Ŷ = 59.707 + 0.531 X1. Work motivation contributes 28.2% to employee performance, (b) There is a positive and significant relationship between work discipline and employee performance as indicated by the correlation coefficient ry.2 = 0.676 with the degree of strength of the relationship "strong" and Ŷ = 27,852 + 0.922 X2 . Work discipline contributes 45.6% to employee performance, and (c) There is a positive and significant relationship between work motivation and work discipline together with employee performance as indicated by the multiple correlation coefficient of ry1.2 = 0.810 with the degree of strength of the relationship. "Very strong" and Ŷ = 49.244 + 0.450X1 + 0.841X2. Work motivation and work discipline together have a 65.6% contribution to employee performance.
The Relationship of Charismatic Leadership, Employee Personality, and Employee Performance: Evidence from PT. Karya Abadi Luhur Supratman, Octaria Vadilla; Entang, Mohammad; Tukiran, Martinus
International Journal of Social and Management Studies Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): International Journal of Social and Management Studies (IJOSMAS)
Publisher : IJOSMAS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (748.842 KB) | DOI: 10.5555/ijosmas.v2i2.15

Abstract

- The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between charismatic leadership, employee personality, and employee performance in PT. Karya Abadi Luhur. The study population was 152 employees and the sample was 111 employees. Collecting data for each variable studied using a questionnaire with a rating scale. The data analysis technique used descriptive statistical analysis techniques and inferential statistical analysis techniques. The results showed: (a) There is a positive and significant relationship between charismatic leadership and employee performance with the correlation coefficient ry.1 = 0.528 with moderate relationship strength and the regression equation Ŷ = 83.547 + 0.443X1. Charismatic leadership contribution to employee performance is 27.9%, (b) There is a significant positive relationship between personality and employee performance with a correlation coefficient of ry.2 = 0.713 with a strong relationship strength and the regression equation Ŷ = 64.022 + 1.504X2. Personality contribution to employee performance is 50.8%, and (c) There is a significant positive relationship between charismatic leadership and personality together with employee performance with a correlation coefficient of R = 0.770 with a strong relationship strength and the regression equation Ŷ = 64.597 + 0.263X1 + 1.267X2. The contribution of charismatic leadership and personality together to employee performance is 59.3%.