Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sriwijaya Law Review Hasanuddin Law Review
Azmi, Ruzita
Unknown Affiliation
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Fishing Quota and International Obligation: Why Has Indonesia been Indicated as a Non-Compliant State Indriyani, Rachma; Rahim, Asmar Abdul; Azmi, Ruzita
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 7 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v7i2.2841

Abstract

Indonesia committed to conserving the tuna resources by participating in some RFMOs. From all regional organizations where Indonesia has been joined, the CCSBT is the unique one, due to it governs a single tuna species, which is called Southern Bluefin Tuna. This kind of tuna is essential for Indonesia because it is the world’s most expensive tuna and SBT migrates through Indonesian fisheries management zones and goes even further within the territorial waters, where the SBT spawning area is located. This natural characteristic distinguishes Indonesia from other Parties to CCSBT. Nevertheless, the Country has been dealing with its obligation to comply with national quota allocation. For some fishing season periods, the CCSBT indicated Indonesia as a non-compliant. By applying the qualitative approach, this study considers how Indonesia’s non-compliance has been addressed in fishing for shared fish stocks. The data collection was conducted through semi-structured interviews and legal analysis of law and policy instruments. This method leads the elaboration to reveal domestic factors affecting non-compliance by Indonesia. This study argues, the fisheries legislation should consider the provision concerning fishing for resources under quota system, hence, it will provide sufficient legal base to take enforcement measures towards non-compliance with fishing quota. 
Fishing Quota and International Obligation: Why Has Indonesia been Indicated as a Non-Compliant State Indriyani, Rachma; Rahim, Asmar Abdul; Azmi, Ruzita
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 7 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v7i2.2841

Abstract

Indonesia committed to conserving the tuna resources by participating in some RFMOs. From all regional organizations where Indonesia has been joined, the CCSBT is the unique one, due to it governs a single tuna species, which is called Southern Bluefin Tuna. This kind of tuna is essential for Indonesia because it is the world’s most expensive tuna and SBT migrates through Indonesian fisheries management zones and goes even further within the territorial waters, where the SBT spawning area is located. This natural characteristic distinguishes Indonesia from other Parties to CCSBT. Nevertheless, the Country has been dealing with its obligation to comply with national quota allocation. For some fishing season periods, the CCSBT indicated Indonesia as a non-compliant. By applying the qualitative approach, this study considers how Indonesia’s non-compliance has been addressed in fishing for shared fish stocks. The data collection was conducted through semi-structured interviews and legal analysis of law and policy instruments. This method leads the elaboration to reveal domestic factors affecting non-compliance by Indonesia. This study argues, the fisheries legislation should consider the provision concerning fishing for resources under quota system, hence, it will provide sufficient legal base to take enforcement measures towards non-compliance with fishing quota. 
Regulating Work from Home to Promote Work-Life Balance: A Comparative Legal Review of Malaysia, the UK and Australia Azmi, Ruzita; Adnan, Zurina; Che Hashim, Rosmawani; Ahmad, Siti Nur Samawati
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 10 Issue 1, January 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.v10i1.4771

Abstract

The traditional office-based model of employment has undergone a significant transformation as flexible working arrangements (FWAs) and remote work have become increasingly prevalent. This development has been influenced by technological progress and evolving societal expectations regarding work-life balance (WLB). In many Commonwealth countries, such as Malaysia, the COVID-19 pandemic catalysed the widespread adoption of flexible and remote work arrangements. As lockdowns and social distancing measures forced businesses to adapt, many organisations discovered the viability and effectiveness of remote work, particularly working from home (WFH). This paper aims to examine the legal framework and policies or best practices in Malaysia that promote WLB and facilitate WFH options, and to compare these policies or best practices and legal frameworks with those in developed commonwealth countries such as the UK and Australia. This paper applies doctrinal research and comparative methods. The doctrinal or library research comes from textbooks, reports and articles from law and non-law journals and reviews. Doctrinal research aims to understand the principles of law and policies dealing with FWA and WFH options. A comparative study will be employed to examine similarities and differences across situations within the same commonwealth legal system. The paper concludes that, to promote WLB and facilitate the WFH option through FWA, a comprehensive legal framework and effective policies are required, especially in Malaysia .
Co-Authors Ahmad, Siti Nur Samawati Che Hashim, Rosmawani Rachma Indriyani, Rachma Rahim, Asmar Abdul Zurina Adnan, Zurina