Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

MISKONSEPSI SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL NUMERASI DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF Udma, Siti Aah Safaatul; Heryandi, Yandi; Muchyidin, Arif
ALGORITMA: Journal of Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 2 (2024): ALGORITMA Journal of Mathematics Education
Publisher : Faculty of Educational sciences, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ajme.v6i2.42778

Abstract

AbstractThis study identifies and analyzes misconceptions about numeracy based on cognitive style. The research used a mixed approach with descriptive analysis involving 34 students in one of the public high schools in Kuningan. Data were collected using the Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT), numeracy questions, and interviews. There were 55.88% reflective cognitive style students, 23.54% impulsive, 11.76% slow-inaccurate, and 8.82% fast-accurate. Reflective students have a misconception rate of 22.10%, with the highest error in symbolic operations. Impulsive students showed a misconception rate of 34.17%, with the highest error in symbolic operations. Reflective students experience process skill errors, while impulsive students often experience transformation errors. These results indicate that students with impulsive cognitive styles rush to solve problems. Students who have a reflective cognitive style, when viewed based on the nature of their cognitive style, on average, show in the classroom that students tend to be slow in solving problems or problems. However, the answers given are more accurate and precise. AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis miskonsepsi pada numerasi berdasarkan gaya kognitif. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan campuran dengan analisis deskriptif yang melibatkan 34 siswa di salah satu SMA Negeri di Kuningan. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan tes Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT), soal numerasi, dan wawancara. Terdapat 55,88% siswa bergaya kognitif reflektif, 23,54% impulsif, 11,76% lambat-tidak akurat, dan 8,82% cepat-akurat. Siswa reflektif memiliki tingkat miskonsepsi sebesar 22,10%, dengan kesalahan tertinggi pada operasi simbolik. Siswa impulsif menunjukkan tingkat miskonsepsi sebesar 34,17%, dengan kesalahan tertinggi juga pada operasi simbolik. Siswa reflektif cenderung mengalami kesalahan keterampilan proses, sementara siswa impulsif sering mengalami kesalahan transformasi. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa kecenderungan siswa dengan gaya kognitif impulsif cenderung terburu-buru dalam menyelesaikan masalah. Sedangkan siswa yang memiliki gaya kognitif reflektif, jika dilihat berdasarkan sifat gaya kognitifnya rata-rata menunjukkan di dalam kelas siswa cenderung lambat dalam menyelesaikan soal atau permasalahan tetapi jawaban yang diberikan lebih akurat dan tepat.
Students' Mathematical Misconceptions on Circular Material Using Five-Tier Diagnostic Heryandi, Yandi; Amalia, Aega
Educational Insights Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : PT Ilmu Inovasi Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58557/eduinsights.v3i1.125

Abstract

In this research, using the Five-Tier Diagnostic Test aims to determine the level of students' ability in solving HOTS type questions on circle material, find out the types of students' mathematical misconceptions in solving HOTS type questions on circle material, and find out the factors that can cause mathematical misconceptions. student. This research method is descriptive quantitative with a case study research design on class VIII students of SMPN 1 Gunung Jati, where the research is more focused on analyzing students' mathematics misconceptions. Data collection techniques include tests and interviews. Meanwhile, data analysis techniques use interactive models. The research results showed that the level of students' ability in solving HOTS type questions on circle material was in the category of understanding the concept, not understanding the concept, and misconceptions. The types of misconceptions experienced by students are correlational misconceptions, classificational misconceptions, and theoretical misconceptions. Internal factors can be caused by students themselves, because students do not try to repeat learning, do not study sources other than the school handbook, and do not try to practice questions other than those given by the teacher. Meanwhile, external factors can come from teachers, textbooks and learning media.