Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS YURIDIS TERKAIT PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA BULLYING MENURUT PASAL 76 C UNDANG-UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN ANAK Dewi, Caryn Andin Cynthia; Rizky, Haliza Kanaya; Averoezy, Fauzul; Sutrisno
Jurnal Akselerasi Merdeka Belajar dalam Pengabdian Orientasi Masyarakat (AMPOEN): Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Vol 2 No 1b (2024): JULI (Tambahan)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS SERAMBI MEKKAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32672/ampoen.v2i1b.2022

Abstract

Bullying is a complex and detrimental social phenomenon, frequently occurring in school environments and leading to serious psychological impacts on victims. This research aims to analyze the enforcement of law against bullying under Article 76 C of the Child Protection Act in Indonesia. The method employed is normative legal research, which emphasizes the implementation of legal norms, regulatory frameworks, and relevant legal theories. This study also utilizes a descriptive analytical approach, collecting secondary data from various legal sources, including laws and previous research findings. Findings indicate that despite clear regulations, law enforcement is often impeded by factors related to law enforcement personnel, legal frameworks, resources, society, and culture. The conclusion of this research emphasizes the need for stronger law implementation and societal awareness to prevent bullying. The implications of this research provide a foundation for more effective policy-making for child protection and fair law enforcement.
Analisis Yuridis Kewenangan Absolut Pengadilan Negeri Dalam Memutus Sengketa Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Terhadap Lembaga Pemerintah (Studi Putusan Nomor: 771/PDT.G/2022/PN JKT.PST) Averoezy, Fauzul; Kartika, Adhitya Widya
Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lexstricta.v4i3.1501

Abstract

Jurisdiction is one of the most common defenses raised in civil disputes, as it determines whether a case falls within the jurisdiction of the court hearing it. This study is motivated by the discrepancy between legal theory and the practice of law enforcement. The methodology employed is a normative legal approach, utilizing statutory analysis, case law analysis through comparable rulings, and a conceptual analysis regarding jurisdiction, unlawful acts, lawsuits, and government agencies. This study aims to outline the elements of the case, particularly regarding the liability of government agencies for alleged PMH, and to analyze the application of positive law in Indonesia. The results of the study indicate that: (1) the government agency cannot be held liable for PMH because the elements of the alleged provision have not been met; and (2) the panel of judges at the Central Jakarta District Court should have declared that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the case, as jurisdiction lies with the Jakarta Administrative Court.