Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin
Handayani, Wiwid Putri
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Marriage Agreement on Common Property in Marriage (Comparative Study of Indonesia and The United States) Handayani, Wiwid Putri; Cahyaningsih, Diana Tantri
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol 6 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v6i2.4617

Abstract

This article compares Indonesia and the United States to discuss a prenuptial agreement for joint marital assets. Indonesia adheres to a civil law legal system by basing prenuptial agreement on Article 29 of the Marriage Law. Meanwhile, the United States, which adheres to a standard legal system, implements the Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act (UPMAA). The research method used in this writing is legal research with a statutory approach and a comparative approach. The results of this research are the reasons for making a prenuptial agreement, among others, because the agreement will facilitate the division of assets, which will benefit both parties in the event of a divorce and as a step to prevent conflicts from arising in the future. The difference between prenuptial agreements between Indonesia and the United States is that for prenuptial agreements in Indonesia, each couple can freely determine the contents of the prenuptial agreement as long as it does not conflict with law, religion, decency, decency, or public order. Meanwhile, in the United States, each couple has specific restrictions regarding what can and cannot be written in the prenuptial agreement. So, freedom in making prenuptial agreements is still bound and limited to specific points.
Marriage Agreement on Common Property in Marriage (Comparative Study of Indonesia and The United States) Handayani, Wiwid Putri; Cahyaningsih, Diana Tantri
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v6i2.4617

Abstract

This article compares Indonesia and the United States to discuss a prenuptial agreement for joint marital assets. Indonesia adheres to a civil law legal system by basing prenuptial agreement on Article 29 of the Marriage Law. Meanwhile, the United States, which adheres to a standard legal system, implements the Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act (UPMAA). The research method used in this writing is legal research with a statutory approach and a comparative approach. The results of this research are the reasons for making a prenuptial agreement, among others, because the agreement will facilitate the division of assets, which will benefit both parties in the event of a divorce and as a step to prevent conflicts from arising in the future. The difference between prenuptial agreements between Indonesia and the United States is that for prenuptial agreements in Indonesia, each couple can freely determine the contents of the prenuptial agreement as long as it does not conflict with law, religion, decency, decency, or public order. Meanwhile, in the United States, each couple has specific restrictions regarding what can and cannot be written in the prenuptial agreement. So, freedom in making prenuptial agreements is still bound and limited to specific points.
Menguji Kepastian Hukum Prinsip Separate Legal Entity terhadap Permohonan Pailit Anak Perusahaan BUMN Persero Handayani, Wiwid Putri; Muryanto, Yudho Taruno; Cahyaningsih, Diana Tantri
Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin Vol. 4 No. 6 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin (Februari - Maret 2026)
Publisher : Green Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jim.v4i6.1643

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji kepastian hukum atas prinsip separate legal entity dalam kepailitan anak perusahaan BUMN Persero. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi karena terjadinya disparitas putusan pengadilan terhadap permohonan pailit anak perusahaan BUMN Persero, contohnya dalam permohonan pailit anak perusahaan BUMN Persero yang diajukan oleh permohonan pailit terhadap PT Indonesia Power yang diajukan Konsorsium Kinarya Liman Margaseta ditolak dengan pertimbangan bahwa kedudukan anak perusahaan sejajar dengan BUMN induk sebagai penyelenggara kepentingan publik sehingga memerlukan persetujuan Menteri Keuangan. Sebaliknya, putusan terhadap PT Kertas Leces (Persero) justru mengabulkan permohonan pailit dengan menegaskan statusnya sebagai badan hukum mandiri sebagaimana perseroan terbatas lainnya. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa anak perusahaan BUMN Persero secara normatif merupakan badan hukum mandiri yang kekayaannya terpisah dari kekayaan negara, sehingga dapat dipailitkan sebagaimana perseroan terbatas lainnya. Namun, penafsiran hukum yang berbeda terhadap status aset sebagai bagian dari kepentingan negara menimbulkan inkonsistensi dalam putusan pengadilan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa diperlukan harmonisasi interpretasi dan penegasan norma untuk menjamin kepastian hukum dalam proses kepailitan anak perusahaan BUMN Persero.
Co-Authors Diana Tantri Cahyaningsih Yudho Taruno Muryanto