Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Hubungan agama dengan Pancasila dalam perspektif konstitusi Nahuddin, Yusuf Eko; Prastyo, Angga
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 11, No 3 (2020): Desember 2020
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v11i3.4070

Abstract

This study is a normative legal research and uses a statute approach and applies a descriptive analysis method which is conducted to analyze the relationship between Religion and Pancasila in the perspective of the 1945 Constitution., and their position in the 1945 Constitution. Religion becomes an object of study that is so complex in its relation to the state. The last time it was seen as the statement of YudianWahyudi (Chairperson of BPIP) about religion as an enemy of Pancasila. The 1945 Constitution which is positioned highest in the hierarchy of statutory regulations is an appropriate indicator in examining the relationship between religion and Pancasila, especially in the framework of a normative legal paradigm in Indonesia. In the main analysis of the results and discussion of this study, it was concluded that Religion is a supporter of the existence of Pancasila, and Religion cannot be contested or compared with Pancasila in the context of its position and position in the state and the administration of government. These results are so important for efforts to realize the objectives of the state, in order to underpin the administration of state in an effective and efficient state, without revisiting the problems and debates that have actually been resolved.How to cite item: Nahuddin, Y., Prastyo, A.(2020). Hubungan agama dengan Pancasila dalam perspektif konstitusi. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 11(3). 282-290.doi:10.26905/idjch.v11i3.4070. 
LIMITATION OF MEANINGFUL PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS IN THE INDONESIAN LAW-MAKING PROCESS Prastyo, Angga
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11 No 3 (2022)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.3.2022.405-436

Abstract

The Indonesian Constitutional Court through Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, in the consideration section, shows how public participation in the formation of laws should be implemented, that is based on formal legal regulations and carried out in a “meaningful participation”. Participation is said to be meaningful if the right to be heard, the right to be considered, and the right to be explained or answered to the opinions and inputs given are fulfilled by the legislators. Who the subjects of meaningful participation are, what the limitations of the material or substance of meaningful participation are, where the appropriate space or media for meaningful participation is, and how to consider and answer to meaningful participation is given, will be the problems discussed in this conceptual study. This study needs to be carried out to clarify the limits of meaningful participation so that the concept or theory as the basis can be applied and accommodated in laws and regulations. The main idea of the result of this study is the findings regarding the limits of meaningful participation in the formation of laws, that is the provision of opinions and inputs carried out by parties affected directly or indirectly and have concern to it. In addition, indicators for assessing the substance of participation and receiving opinions and inputs are “the purpose” of the regulation that will be formed. The participation media as well as participation explanations and answers are delivered conventionally and virtually with certain intelligence adjustments to the information technology used.
Improving support vector machine and backpropagation performance for diabetes mellitus classification Prastyo, Angga; Sutikno, Sutikno; Khadijah, Khadijah
Computer Science and Information Technologies Vol 5, No 2: July 2024
Publisher : Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11591/csit.v5i2.p140-149

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a glucose disorder disease in the human body that contributes significantly to the high mortality rate. Various studies on early detection and classification have been conducted as a DM prevention effort by applying a machine learning model. The problems that may occur are weak model performance and misclassification caused by imbalanced data. The existence of dominating (majority) data causes poor model performance in identifying minority data. This paper proposed handling the problem of imbalanced data by performing the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) and observing its effect on the classification performance of the support vector machine (SVM) and Backpropagation artificial neural network (ANN) methods. The experiment showed that the SVM method and imbalanced data achieved 94.31% accuracy, and the Backpropagation ANN achieved 91.56% accuracy. At the same time, the SVM method and balanced data produced an accuracy of 98.85%, while the Backpropagation ANN method and balanced data produced an accuracy of 94.90%. The results show that oversampling techniques can improve the performance of the classification model for each data class.