Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

KONFLIK KEPENTINGAN DALAM PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 90/PUU/XXI/2023 Permadi, Haru; Wisnu Wardhana, Oppy Pramudya
MAKSIGAMA Vol 17 No 2 (2023): Maksigama : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37303/maksigama.v17i2.149

Abstract

MK tanggal 16 Oktober 2023 mengucapkan putusan Nomor 90/PUU/XXI/2023. Putusan tersebut berakibat warga negara Indonesia, termasuk Gibran Rakabuming Raka yang berusia di bawah 40 (empat puluh) tahun dapat mendaftar sebagai calon presiden/wakil presiden. Putusan Nomor 90/PUU/XXI/2023 sontak memunculkan berbagai macam wacana karena keikutsertaan Anwar Usman dalam pemeriksaan dan pengambilan putusan. Penulisan ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui apakah terdapat konflik kepentingan dalam pemeriksaan perkara Nomor 90/PUU/XXI/2023 dan apa akibat hukum putusan perkara tersebut bila terdapat konflik kepentingan di dalam proses persidangannya. Penulisan ini dilakukan dengan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan dan pendekatan kasus. Dari pembahasan yang dilakukan, terdapat konflik kepentingan dalam pemeriksaan perkara Nomor 90/PUU/XXI/2023 karena Gibran Rakabuming Raka merupakan keponakan dari Ketua MK. Berkaitan dengan putusan Nomor 90/PUU/XXI/2023, terdapat cacat formal bila Majelis Kehormatan MK memutus terjadi pelanggaran kode etik dan kode perilaku. Kata Kunci: MK, Konflik Kepentingan, Kode Etik.
Legal Reasoning Behind the Abolition of the Right to File for Judicial Review of Administrative Court Decisions by Administrative Agencies or Officials Permadi, Haru; W. W., Oppy Pramudya
Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE) Vol 8 No 3 (2025): Sharia Economics
Publisher : Sharia Economics Department Universitas KH. Abdul Chalim, Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31538/iijse.v8i3.8628

Abstract

The purpose of writing this article is to examine the legal reasoning for the elimination of the right to review the decision of a state administrative dispute by a state administrative body or official. The method used in writing this article is normative juridical. The study found that the Constitutional Court judges used a historical approach, a conceptual approach, and systematic interpretation in determining the abolition of the right of review in state administrative disputes by state administrative bodies or officials. In conclusion, the judges of the Constitutional Court abolished the right of judicial review to provide legal certainty over an inkracht decision of the State Administrative Court, protect public rights, and realize the original purpose of establishing the State Administrative Court.
Pengaturan Bantuan Pangan Non Tunai di Kota Malang (Studi Peraturan Walikota Nomor 6 Tahun 2020 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Bantuan Pangan Non Tunai Daerah) Permadi, Haru; Wardhana, Oppy Pramudya Wisnu
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1213

Abstract

The Non-Cash Food Assistance Program is a government initiative that aims to provide monthly food assistance to eligible families, followed by Sub-District Social Welfare Workers. The program has been implemented in 514 districts and cities in Indonesia, including one special city. The location in question is Malang City. The research methodology used in this study is descriptive qualitative. The descriptive qualitative approach is used as a means to investigate and analyze observations and findings within a particular domain or discipline. The research findings show that the Non-Cash Food Assistance Program has provided assistance to a total of 7,226 beneficiary families, as reported by the Ministry of Social Affairs. Malang City consists of 57 urban villages spread across 5 sub-districts. The outcome measures from this study have proven to be very important in helping beneficiaries effectively reduce daily expenditures, thus allowing the organization to generate higher profits that can be utilized to meet additional needs. Indirectly, this can be interpreted as an indication of their improved social welfare. Therefore, it can be said that this program has had a significant impact on poverty reduction efforts in the Malang urban area.