Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Penegakan Hukum terhadap Penyalahgunaan Senjata Tajam oleh Geng Motor di Kota Jambi Zamzimi, Padlan
Wajah Hukum Vol 9, No 1 (2025): April
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v9i1.1828

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the law enforcement against the misuse of sharp weapons by Motorcycle Gangs in Jambi City and the obstacles faced by the Police in carrying out the enforcement and the efforts made by the Police in overcoming these obstacles. The approach method used in this study is empirical juridical. The results of the study are that law enforcers have implemented the right procedures in handling cases of misuse of sharp weapons, starting with raids on the highway followed by the detention of perpetrators who are proven to be carrying sharp weapons illegally. However, the Jambi Police face a number of obstacles in implementing law enforcement against this crime. These obstacles include the legal aspect itself, limited human resources for law enforcement, lack of facilities and infrastructure, and low public awareness. To overcome these obstacles, the police have taken several strategic steps. First, establishing cooperation with the Intelligence Directorate to prevent the misuse of sharp weapons and strengthening coordination with the Regional Police Chiefs throughout Indonesia. Second, increasing the motivation and competence of personnel through special training that focuses on crimes related to sharp weapons. Third, encouraging changes in legal policies that are relevant to this crime.
Eksistensi Putusan Penyelesaian Sengketa oleh Komisi Informasi Provinsi Jambi dalam Pemenuhan Hak Memperoleh Informasi Publik Yanti, Herma; Zamzimi, Padlan; Havid, Meutia
Wajah Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v9i2.1973

Abstract

The dispute resolution decision by the Information Commission is expected to encourage the emergence of information disclosure by Public Agencies that previously did not provide access to Applicants who needed the information. Considering that previously the Applicant had gone through the procedures and the length of time determined by law from submitting an application to the targeted Public Agency, submitting an objection to the Superior of the Public Agency concerned to the request for dispute resolution at the Jambi Provincial Information Commission, among others. The purpose of this study is to determine how the existence of the dispute resolution decision by the Jambi Provincial Information Commission on the fulfillment of the Applicant's right to obtain public information. This research is normative juridical with an approach of 43 decisions of the Jambi Provincial Information Commission from 2022 to 2024. The data was collected through a study of decision documents and analyzed qualitatively. The results show that most of the dispute resolution decisions provide a large space for the fulfillment of the Applicant's right to obtain the necessary information. Various information that was previously closed to the applicant is declared through the decision as open information. And of the decisions rejecting the application, which is also quite a large number, most of the reasons are because the dispute application submitted by the applicant is not within the scope of the Information Commission's authority. In other words, only a small part of the rejection decisions are because they confirm the decision of the Public Agency that refused to provide the information requested by the Applicant.
Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Oknum Partai Politik dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidananya Zamzimi, Padlan
Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi Vol 25, No 1 (2025): Februari
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/jiubj.v25i1.6065

Abstract

This research aims to determine the criminal responsibility of political parties for criminal acts of corruption. The research method used is normative juridical. The results of the research reveal that the criminal responsibility of political party individuals for criminal acts of corruption is Article 20 Paragraph (l) and (2) of Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. Penalties that can be imposed on individuals from political parties who are proven to have legally committed criminal acts of corruption, if the political party is considered a corporation and it can be proven that there is a flow of funds into the political party's coffers through the Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (FTRAC). Dissolution of political parties as an additional form of punishment can be carried out. Regarding the authority of two judicial institutions to dissolve political parties, the two judicial institutions can do the same thing for different reasons or other options, namely the division of authority where the criminal justice system is only a recommendation considering that the penalty for freezing or dissolving a corporation is only an additional penalty, whereas freezing or dissolving remains the authority of the Constitutional Court.