Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Debit Andalan Pada Sungai Pacal Di Hulu Bendung Klepek Untuk Kebutuhan Air Irigasi (Studi Kasus Daerah Irigasi Pacal Kiri): Analysis of Mainstay Discharge on Pacal River In Upper Klepek Weir For Irrigation Water Needs (Case study of Pacal Kiri Irrigation Area) Setiawan, Awang; Mushthofa
Jurnal Teknik Sipil Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): De'Teksi : Jurnal Teknik Sipil
Publisher : Universitas Bojonegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (559.446 KB) | DOI: 10.56071/deteksi.v7i1.397

Abstract

Kekeringan dan kurangnya suplay pembagian air dimusim kemarau masih menjadi sebuah permasalahan yang dialamai oleh banyak petani khususnya petani yang berada di daerah irigasi sungai Pacal selain itu kurangnya pemahaman masyarakat tentang RTTG ( Rencana Tata tanam Global) mengakibatkan kurang maksimalnya hasil dan gagalnya panen. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui kebutuhan irigasi dan besarnya debit andalan di daerah irigasi Pacal kiri. Perhitungan dan Analisis kebutuhan air irigasi menggunakan metode FPR-LPR sedangkan untuk debit andalan menggunakan metode FJ Mock dan Basic year karakteristik aliran. Dari hasil analisis didapatkan bahwa kebutuhan air irigasi di daerah irigasi pacal kiri ± 5.918 m3/Ha. Debit tahun kering keandalan (97.30%) didapatkan debit maksimum sebesar 11.49 m3/dt, debit minimum sebesar 0.01 m3 /dt dengan debit rata-rata sebesar 3.34 m3/dt. Debit tahun rendah keandalan (75.34%) didapatkan debit maksimum sebesar 10.76m3/dt, debit minimum sebesar 0.04 m3 m3/dt dengan debit rata-rata sebesar 3.79 m3/dt. Debit tahun normal keandalan (50.68%) didapatkan debit maksimum sebesar 14.22 m3/dt, debit minimum sebesar 0.08 m m3/dt dengan debit rata-rata sebesar 5.60 m3/dt.Debit tahun cukup keandalan (26.02%) didapatkan debit maksimum sebesar 10.34 m3/dt, debit minimum sebesar 0.76 m3/dt dengan debit rata- rata sebesar 5.52 m3/dt.
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Implementation of Corporate Cultural Transformation with the Eight-Step Approach of Kotter (2014) and ADKAR Model (2012) Case Study on PT XYZ Setiawan, Awang; Fitriany, Fitriany
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 5 No. 10 (2025): Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v5i10.51283

Abstract

PT XYZ is experiencing a decline in financial condition, leading to a downgrade in bond ratings due to the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and project management errors. Based on the situation, the management of PT XYZ decided that a business transformation is necessary to improve the financial condition and ensure the company's sustainability. This business transformation consists of three transformations: cultural, people, and system. Cultural transformation becomes an important foundation for implementing other transformation programs. Evaluation of the implementation of cultural transformation is important to determine whether the transformation has been carried out effectively and sustainably. In this study, the evaluation of the cultural transformation program at PT XYZ uses two approaches: Kotter (2014)'s eight-step and ADKAR (2012). The use of both approaches is expected to result in a more comprehensive and in-depth evaluation. Kotter (2014)'s approach for conducting evaluations from an organizational perspective, and the ADKAR (2012) model for conducting evaluations from an individual perspective within the organization. This research uses a data triangulation approach, which includes data from company documentation studies, interviews (3 informants), and questionnaires (87 respondents). The study results show that overall, PT XYZ has carried out an effective cultural transformation in accordance with Kotter (2014)'s eight-step change model and the ADKAR (2012) model. However, there are several shortcomings that need attention and improvement, such as a top-down approach to vision, resistance due to additional workload, and benefit incentives that have not yet been directly felt by all employees.