Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

International Relations in the Perspective of Fiqh al-Siyasah Abdillah, Masykuri; Masyrofah, Masyrofah
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol 12, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v12i2.32248

This article analyses the concept and practice of international relations according to fiqh al-siyasah, which is related to war and peace, international law, diplomacy, and international cooperation. This study emphasises the normative concept of international relations (al-‘alâqât al-dauliyyah) using international relations studies and international law. Thus, the sources of data or information in this study are the Quran, Hadis, the opinions of Muslim scholars (ulama) and theories of international relations and international law. Since the beginning, Islam has provided guidelines on relations between groups and kingdoms, which in today's context refer to international relations. In addition to the principles of international relations, the Quran and Hadith also provide normative references, which the Muslim scholars formulated as international law. Philosophically, there is a difference between secular international law and Islamic law derived from revelation understood by contextual ijtihad. However, at present, the majority of Muslim scholars believe that, in general, there is compatibility between the principles of modern international law and the principles of Islamic law, especially in the form of agreements ('uhûd and mawâtsiq), customs ('âdât), and ratio ('aql), which also recognised by Islamic law.

Islam and Democracy: The Case of the Early Reform Era Abdillah, Masykuri
JURNAL INDO-ISLAMIKA Vol 14, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Graduate School of Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jii.v14i2.43764

Almost all ulama and Muslim intellectuals in Indonesia accept the term “democracy” and support it as a system that must be implemented in Indonesia. The emergence of the “reform era” following the fall of authoritarian Soeharto’s government in 1998 was marked as the starting point of the transition to substantive democracy. The political reform took the form of conducting free elections, developing a multiparty system, and guaranteeing more freedom for the press and citizens to express their opinions and criticism, and the amendments to the 1945 Constitution. This ran well, so the democratic transition was considered successful. The political parties and civil society organizations, including those with an Islamic background, played an important role in this transition. To develop a civilized democracy in Indonesia, the government, political parties, and civil societies, especially religious organizations, made efforts to strengthen ethics and moral education as well as civic education, conveying values in a democratic system, such as tolerance, trust, responsibility, law consciousness, and others. This research was done through qualitative approach, based on library documents.

Public Finance From The Perspective Of Contemporary Fiqh Al-Siyâsah Abdillah, Masykuri
Al-Iqtishad: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah Vol 16, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/aiq.v16i1.39503

. This article discusses public finance from the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence focusing on fiscal policy. Using the rules of ushul fiqh which emphasizes maqâshid al-syarî'ah as the main method in siyâsah syar'iyyah. This policy includes the function of managing sources of public income and their distribution or managing public spending as well as the function of financial stabilization. The study found that management of public revenues, such as zakat, waqf, infaq, sadaqah, in addition to jizyah, kharâj, ghanîmah, and fai' is currently not yet practiced, so ulama provides support for the development of a fair tax system and state efforts to manage natural resources sustainably as well as the development of accountable public services. The main priority in preparing the state budget is realizing people's welfare, poverty alleviation, and economic development.Abstrak:Artikel ini membahas keuangan negara atau keuangan publik (al-mâliyyah al-‘âmah) dalam perspektif fikih siyasah, dengan penekanan pada bahasan kebijakan fiskal (al-siyâsah al-mâliyyah). Sumber data atau informasi dalam pembahasan ini adalah Al-Quran, Hadits, dan pendapat ulama, yang dianalisis dengan menggunakan metode ushul fiqh yang menekankan pada maqâshid al-syarî’ah sebagai metode utama dalam siyâsah syar’iyyah. Sejak awal Islam telah memberikan pedoman umum tentang keuangan publik, baik dalam bentuk kebijakan fiskal maupun kebijakan moneter. Kebijakan fiskal ini meliputi fungsi alokasi atau pengelolaan sumber-sumber pendapatan publik (al-mawârid al-mâliyyah) dan fungsi distribusi atau pengelolaan belanja publik (al-infâq al-‘âm) serta fungsi stabilisasi keuangan (al-istiqrâr al-mâlî). Al-Quran dan Hadits telah menyebutkan beberapa bentuk pendapatan publik, yakni: zakat, wakaf, infak, sadaqah, di samping jizyah, kharâj, ghanîmah, dan fai’. Namun pada saat ini sebagian dari sumber-sumber pendapatan ini tidak lagi dipraktikkan. Sebagai gantinya, para ulama mendukung pengembangan sistem pajak secara adil dan usaha-usaha negara untuk mengolah sumber daya alam serta pengembangan pelayanan publik. Dalam penyusunan anggaran belanja negara (publik), prioritas utama adalah untuk mewujudkan kesejahteraan rakyat dan penanggulangan kemiskinan serta pertumbuhan dan pengembangan ekonomi.

Theological Responses to the Concepts of Democracy and Human Rights: The Case of Contemporary Indonesian Muslim Intellectuals Abdillah, Masykuri
Studia Islamika Vol. 3 No. 1 (1996): Studia Islamika
Publisher : Center for Study of Islam and Society (PPIM) Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/sdi.v3i1.812

Almost all governments in the world, including authoritarian, claiming that their political system is democratic. However, not all governments in the Muslim world accept this system. Among the 'ulama and Muslim intellectuals themselves there are differences of opinion about the system and the concept of democracy. In general, the modernist Muslim groups accept this system, because he was judged to be compatible with Islam, while Muslim groups "fundamentalist" and mostly conservative Muslims reject this system, because it supposedly excludes the sovereignty of God.The problem that often arises is how to implement human rights in Islamic societies. Then in 1990 the Muslim countries which are members of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) issued a "Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam" , after over 13 years of discussing this issue among its members. Thus, there are two declarations for the people of Islam, namely: Cairo Declaration on the top and the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights".DOI: 10.15408/sdi.v3i1.812

Formalizing Fiqh Al-Aqalliyyat for Muslim Minorities Perspectives of Abdallah bin Bayyah, Taha Jabir Al-Alwani & Jamāl al-Dīn 'Atiyyah Mahendra, Bayu Arif; Abdillah, Masykuri; Al-Dawoody, Ahmed; Abduh, Muhamad
Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman Vol 28, No 2 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/madania.v28i2.6472

Minority jurisprudence is an innovation in jurisprudence regarding various problems faced by Muslims living in the midst of a non-Muslim majority. This research focuses on the methodology used by the conceptors of fiqh al-aqalliyyat, namely Abdallah bin Bayyah, Taha Jabir Al-Alwani & Jamāl al-Dīn 'Atiyyah in building the structure of the ijtihad framework of fiqh al-aqalliyyat in countries with Muslim minorities. This research is a qualitative literature study with several legal research approaches. More specifically, in the study of Islamic law this research belongs to the category of philosophical-normative-empirical research, by examining three main ideas initiated by the conceptors of fiqh al-aqalliyyat namely Abdallah bin Bayyah, Taha Jabir Al-Alwani & Jamāl al-Dīn 'Atiyyah. This research concludes that the thought of fiqh al-aqalliyyat Abdallah bin Bayyah, Taha Jabir Al-Alwani & Jamāl al-Dīn 'Atiyyah is considered to be able to accommodate the problems of Muslim minorities, by covering all the principles, methodologies, concepts of ijtihad from each mujtahid who focuses on fiqh al-aqalliyyat, so that these methods that have become legal products can be used for Muslim minorities to be able to carry out the principles of Islamic teachings substantially and coexist with non-Muslim majorities. Fikih minoritas merupakan inovasi dalam berijtihad tentang berbagai problematika yang dihadapi muslim yang hidup di tengah mayoritas non-Muslim. Dalam penelitian ini berfokus pada metodologis yang dipakai oleh konseptor fiqh al-aqalliyyat yakni Abdallah bin Bayyah, Taha Jabir Al-Alwani & Jamāl al-Dīn ‘Atiyyah dalam membangun struktur kerangka ijtihad fiqh al-aqalliyyat pada negara dengan minoritas muslim. Penelitian ini merupakan studi kepustakaan yang bersifat kualitatif dengan beberapa pendekatan penelitian hukum. Lebih spesifik lagi, dalam kajian hukum Islam penelitian ini termasuk kategori penelitian filosofis-normatif-empiris, dengan mengkaji tiga pokok pikiran yang digagas oleh konseptor fiqh al-aqalliyyat yakni Abdallah bin Bayyah, Taha Jabir Al-Alwani & Jamāl al-Dīn ‘Atiyyah. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pemikiran fiqh al-aqalliyyat Abdallah bin Bayyah, Taha Jabir Al-Alwani & Jamāl al-Dīn ‘Atiyyah dinilai dapat mengakomodir permasalahan muslim minoritas, dengan mencakup seluruh prinsip-prinsip, metodologi, konsep ijtihad dari masing-masing mujtahid yang berfokus pada fiqh al-aqalliyyat, sehingga metode-metode tersebut yang sudah menjadi produk hukum dapat digunakan bagi muslim minoritas untuk dapat menjalankan prinsip-prinsip ajaran Islam secara substansial dan hidup berdampingan dengan mayoriats non muslim.

Islam and Democracy: The Case of the Early Reform Era Abdillah, Masykuri
JURNAL INDO-ISLAMIKA Vol. 14 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Graduate School of UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jii.v14i2.43764

Almost all ulama and Muslim intellectuals in Indonesia accept the term “democracy” and support it as a system that must be implemented in Indonesia. The emergence of the “reform era” following the fall of authoritarian Soeharto’s government in 1998 was marked as the starting point of the transition to substantive democracy. The political reform took the form of conducting free elections, developing a multiparty system, and guaranteeing more freedom for the press and citizens to express their opinions and criticism, and the amendments to the 1945 Constitution. This ran well, so the democratic transition was considered successful. The political parties and civil society organizations, including those with an Islamic background, played an important role in this transition. To develop a civilized democracy in Indonesia, the government, political parties, and civil societies, especially religious organizations, made efforts to strengthen ethics and moral education as well as civic education, conveying values in a democratic system, such as tolerance, trust, responsibility, law consciousness, and others. This research was done through qualitative approach, based on library documents.

Settlement Through Mediation Between the Normative and Practice in Religious Judiciary Agencies Karmawan, Karmawan; Abdillah, Masykuri
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v8i1.15002

Abstract:Mediation in religious courts is believed to be an effective mechanism for reducing the case buildup. Due to the completion of the case at the mediation stage, the parties do not need to continue the litigation process. The agreement reached in the mediation process will be ratified by the judge and therefore has the same legal consequences as the judge's decision. Normatively mediation based on PerMA Number 1 of 2016 provides a new direction as the Supreme Court's policy to put more pressure on the number of cases that enter the court so that mediation at the court level will reduce the accumulation of cases. Even the practices of mediation at the religious court level mediators still use traditional methods like advising the parties. As the court case is examined, the parties to the dispute can see that litigation no longer provides a better solution.Keywords: Mediation, mediator, normative, practice, the religious court Abstrak:Mediasi di pengadilan agama diyakini sebagai mekanisme yang efektif untuk mengurangi penumpukan kasus. Karena penyelesaian kasus pada tahap mediasi, para pihak tidak perlu melanjutkan proses litigasi. Kesepakatan yang dicapai dalam proses mediasi akan disahkan oleh hakim dan karenanya memiliki konsekuensi hukum yang sama dengan keputusan hakim. Mediasi secara normal berdasarkan PerMA Nomor 1 tahun 2016 memberikan arah baru karena kebijakan Mahkamah Agung untuk lebih menekan jumlah kasus yang masuk ke pengadilan sehingga mediasi di tingkat pengadilan akan mengurangi akumulasi kasus. Bahkan praktik-praktik mediasi di tingkat pengadilan religius mediator masih menggunakan metode tradisional seperti menasihati para pihak. Ketika kasus pengadilan diperiksa, adalah mungkin bagi para pihak yang berselisih untuk melihat bahwa proses pengadilan tidak lagi memberikan solusi yang lebih baik.Kata kunci: Mediasi, mediator, normatif, praktik, pengadilan agama Аннотация:Посредничество в религиозных судах, как полагают, является эффективным механизмом для уменьшения количества дел. В связи с завершением дела на стадии посредничества сторонам не нужно продолжать судебный процесс. Соглашение, достигнутое в процессе посредничества, будет ратифицировано судьей и, следовательно, имеет те же правовые последствия, что и решение судьи. Нормативно, посредничество, основанное на Правилах Верховного Суда (PerMA) № 1 от 2016 года, обеспечивает новое направление политики Верховного суда, направленное на подавление количества дел, поступающих в суд, с тем, чтобы посредничество на уровне суда снизило их совокупность. Однако практика посредничества на уровне религиозного суда показывает, что посредник все еще использует традиционные методы, такие как консультирование сторон. Поскольку судебное дело рассматривается, стороны в споре могут увидеть, что судебный процесс больше не дает лучшего решения.Ключевые слова: Посредничество, Посредник, Норматив, Практика, Религиозный суд

International Relations in the Perspective of Fiqh al-Siyasah Abdillah, Masykuri; Masyrofah, Masyrofah
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v12i2.32248

This article analyses the concept and practice of international relations according to fiqh al-siyasah, which is related to war and peace, international law, diplomacy, and international cooperation. This study emphasises the normative concept of international relations (al-‘alâqât al-dauliyyah) using international relations studies and international law. Thus, the sources of data or information in this study are the Quran, Hadis, the opinions of Muslim scholars (ulama) and theories of international relations and international law. Since the beginning, Islam has provided guidelines on relations between groups and kingdoms, which in today's context refer to international relations. In addition to the principles of international relations, the Quran and Hadith also provide normative references, which the Muslim scholars formulated as international law. Philosophically, there is a difference between secular international law and Islamic law derived from revelation understood by contextual ijtihad. However, at present, the majority of Muslim scholars believe that, in general, there is compatibility between the principles of modern international law and the principles of Islamic law, especially in the form of agreements ('uhûd and mawâtsiq), customs ('âdât), and ratio ('aql), which also recognised by Islamic law.

Public Finance From The Perspective Of Contemporary Fiqh Al-Siyâsah Abdillah, Masykuri
Al-Iqtishad: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 16 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/aiq.v16i1.39503

. This article discusses public finance from the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence focusing on fiscal policy. Using the rules of ushul fiqh which emphasizes maqâshid al-syarî'ah as the main method in siyâsah syar'iyyah. This policy includes the function of managing sources of public income and their distribution or managing public spending as well as the function of financial stabilization. The study found that management of public revenues, such as zakat, waqf, infaq, sadaqah, in addition to jizyah, kharâj, ghanîmah, and fai' is currently not yet practiced, so ulama provides support for the development of a fair tax system and state efforts to manage natural resources sustainably as well as the development of accountable public services. The main priority in preparing the state budget is realizing people's welfare, poverty alleviation, and economic development.Abstrak:Artikel ini membahas keuangan negara atau keuangan publik (al-mâliyyah al-‘âmah) dalam perspektif fikih siyasah, dengan penekanan pada bahasan kebijakan fiskal (al-siyâsah al-mâliyyah). Sumber data atau informasi dalam pembahasan ini adalah Al-Quran, Hadits, dan pendapat ulama, yang dianalisis dengan menggunakan metode ushul fiqh yang menekankan pada maqâshid al-syarî’ah sebagai metode utama dalam siyâsah syar’iyyah. Sejak awal Islam telah memberikan pedoman umum tentang keuangan publik, baik dalam bentuk kebijakan fiskal maupun kebijakan moneter. Kebijakan fiskal ini meliputi fungsi alokasi atau pengelolaan sumber-sumber pendapatan publik (al-mawârid al-mâliyyah) dan fungsi distribusi atau pengelolaan belanja publik (al-infâq al-‘âm) serta fungsi stabilisasi keuangan (al-istiqrâr al-mâlî). Al-Quran dan Hadits telah menyebutkan beberapa bentuk pendapatan publik, yakni: zakat, wakaf, infak, sadaqah, di samping jizyah, kharâj, ghanîmah, dan fai’. Namun pada saat ini sebagian dari sumber-sumber pendapatan ini tidak lagi dipraktikkan. Sebagai gantinya, para ulama mendukung pengembangan sistem pajak secara adil dan usaha-usaha negara untuk mengolah sumber daya alam serta pengembangan pelayanan publik. Dalam penyusunan anggaran belanja negara (publik), prioritas utama adalah untuk mewujudkan kesejahteraan rakyat dan penanggulangan kemiskinan serta pertumbuhan dan pengembangan ekonomi.

Title

Found 9 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 9 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 9 Documents
Search