Teeraphan, Papontee
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Lex Publica

Compliance of the Subjective Terms of Detention in Criminal Procedure with International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Safinatunnajah, Awalia; Ali, Mahrus; Teeraphan, Papontee
Lex Publica Vol. 9 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : APPTHI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58829/lp.9.2.2022.88-101

Abstract

The development of the modus operandi of money laundering become a major concern. Cryptocurrency technology has the potential to become a new media for money laundering because law enforcement officials still use to this technology, this technology which has a pseudonymous and even anonymous character is a new means for money laundering perpetrators to disguise their crimes. This study aims to examine how cryptocurrency is used as the modus operandi of money laundering and how is the readiness of regulations in Indonesia, especially Law No. 8 of 2010 in prosecuting money laundering offenders with the cryptocurrency modus operandi. This study uses a normative juridical method with legal materials from literature studies and uses a statutory regulation approach. The results of this study are the use of crypto as a mode of money laundering due to peer-to-peer networks, namely the absence of third parties to supervise crypto transactions, high user privacy, and transaction flexibility. Keywords: Modus Operandi, Cryptocurrency, Money Laundering, Indonesia Abstrak Berkembangnya modus operandi pencucian uang menjadi perhatian utama. Teknologi cryptocurrency berpotensi menjadi media baru TPPU dikarenakan masih awamnya teknologi tersebut oleh aparat penegak hukum, teknologi yang memiliki karakter pseudonymous bahkan anonymous ini menjadi sarana baru bagi pelaku TPPU untuk menyamarkan kejahatannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji bagaimana pemanfaatan cryptocurrency sebagai modus operandi TPPU dan bagaimana kesiapan regulasi di Indonesia khususnya Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 dalam menjerat pelaku TPPU dengan modus operandi cryptocurrency. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan bahan hukum studi kepustakaan dan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian ini adalah pemanfaatan kripto sebagai modus pencucian uang dikarenakan jaringan peer-to-peer yaitu tidak adanya pihak ketiga yang melakukan pengawasan transaksi kripto, privasi pengguna yang tinggi, dan fleksibilitas transaksi.Kata kunci: Modus Operandi, Cryptocurrency, Pencucian Uang, Indonesia
International and Regional Agreements and the Evolution of Consumer Protection in Cross-Border E-Commerce: Indonesia Within ASEAN Prabowo, M. Shidqon; Teeraphan, Papontee
Lex Publica Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : APPTHI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58829/lp.12.2.2025.311

Abstract

This study examines the role of international and regional agreements in shaping Indonesia’s consumer protection framework in cross-border e-commerce, with particular reference to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). It addresses three key issues: the extent to which such agreements influence normative legal development, how far these commitments are implemented domestically, and what gaps persist between legal harmonization and practical enforcement. Using a normative juridical (doctrinal) approach, the study analyzes Indonesian laws alongside regional instruments such as the ASEAN Agreement on E-Commerce, the findings indicate that ASEAN frameworks significantly contribute to regulatory alignment, promoting harmonization, cooperation, and the adoption of international best practices. However, this alignment remains largely formal. Substantial gaps persist in enforcement, particularly in relation to standard-form contracts, jurisdictional uncertainty, institutional limitations, and the underdevelopment of online dispute resolution mechanisms. The study concludes that effective consumer protection requires not only legal convergence but also stronger institutional capacity, clearer private international law rules, and integrated dispute resolution systems. Bridging the gap between normative commitments and practical implementation is essential for ensuring meaningful consumer protection in Indonesia’s evolving digital economy.