Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

TRADITIONAL BALLO/TUAK BEVERAGE AS A PHENOMENON OF ALCOHOLIC DRINKS IN SOCIETY: Analysis of Social Impact and Sharia Maqashid Perspective Amalia, Siti; Arif, Firman Muh.; Kaddase, Thayyib
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 12, No 3 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v12i3.5523

Abstract

This research aims to identify the factors driving the residents of Kadong-Kadong Village to consume ballo. Additionally, the study aims to analyze community responses and government policies regarding the phenomenon of ballo consumption in the area using the perspective of Maqashid al-Syariah. The research methodology employed is a qualitative approach or field research with an exploratory nature. Legal, sociological, and normative approaches serve as the analytical foundation. Data collection involves observation, in-depth interviews, and documentary studies. The results indicate that the primary reasons for the residents of Kadong-Kadong Village, Bajo Barat Subdistrict, Luwu Regency, consuming ballo are to alleviate stress and influenced by their environment and social interactions. Community responses to this phenomenon are characterized by concern, and the village government has issued warnings about the dangers of ballo consumption, although there is currently no binding village regulation to address this issue. The phenomenon of ballo consumption in Kadong-Kadong Village is identified as conflicting with the concept of Maqashid al-Syariah, particularly in aspects related to preserving religion, life, intellect, lineage, and wealth. The implications of this research suggest that this phenomenon may jeopardize the well-being of the community, which should be safeguarded by Islamic law for the benefit of both the present and the hereafter.Keywords: Alcohol consumption phenomenon, Ballo/tuak beverage, Maqashid al-Syariah.
Legal Analysis of The Judge's Decision on The Criminal Act of Money Politics in the 2019 Elections in East Luwu (Study of Decision Number 61/Pid.Sus/2019/Pn.Mll): A Critical Discourse Analysis Syahriwijaya, Egi Ramdhani; Yusmad, Muammar Arafat; Arif, Firman Muh.
IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Lite
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/ideas.v13i2.5822

Abstract

This study examines the judicial discourse surrounding money politics in Indonesian electoral processes through a critical discourse analysis of Decision Number 61/PID.SUS/2019/PN.MLL from the Malili District Court regarding criminal acts of money politics during the 2019 elections in East Luwu Regency. Using Fairclough's three-dimensional framework of critical discourse analysis, this research investigates how legal language constructs and legitimizes judicial reasoning in electoral corruption cases, while examining the underlying power relations and ideological assumptions embedded within the court's decision.  The methodology combines textual analysis, discursive practice examination, and sociocultural practice investigation to uncover how the judge's linguistic choices reflect broader institutional attitudes toward electoral integrity and democratic governance. The study analyzes lexical choices, syntactic structures, modality, and argumentation patterns within the legal text to reveal how judicial discourse shapes public understanding of electoral crimes and their consequences.  Key findings reveal that the judicial discourse employs specific linguistic strategies that position money politics as a threat to democratic legitimacy while simultaneously reinforcing state authority in electoral oversight. The analysis demonstrates how legal language serves not merely as a neutral vehicle for justice delivery but as a powerful tool for constructing social reality and reinforcing existing power structures. The court's decision reflects tensions between legal formalism and contextual considerations of local political dynamics in East Luwu.  The research contributes to understanding how judicial discourse in Indonesia's post-reform era constructs electoral integrity narratives and legitimizes legal interventions in political processes. It reveals the complex interplay between legal reasoning, political context, and social power relations in contemporary Indonesian democracy. The findings have implications for legal reform, judicial training, and broader discussions about combating electoral corruption in emerging democracies.