Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pemberhentian Terhadap Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Dalam Kepailitan Melalui Circular Resolution Pradipto, Nalendra; Kartika, Clara Renny; Kusuma, Agung Jaya
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Suara Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v4n1.p86-106

Abstract

Pihak yang berhak menetapkan adanya perubahan anggaran dasar ialah RUPS (Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham), akan tetapi apabila terjadi kepailitan dalam perseroan terbatas, kurator memiliki peran dalam memberikan persetujuan terhadap adanya perubahan anggaran dasar tersebut. RUPS sendiri terdiri dari RUPS Tahunan dan RUPS lainnya yang mana termasuk RUPSLB (RUPS Luar Biasa) serta terdapat adanya keputusan sirkuler yang mana keputusannya juga sama halnya mengikat secara sah dan memiliki kekuatan hukum apabila seluruh pemegang saham menyetujui secara tertulis dengan menandatangani usul yang bersangkutan walaupun dalam pelaksanaannya seluruh pemegang saham tidak hadir secara fisik. Apabila pemberhentian terhadap Direksi dilakukan melalui keputusan sirkuler, Direksi tetap diberikan kesempatan untuk melakukan pembelaan diri dikarenakan belum tentu Direksi tersebut yang menyebabkan terjadinya kepailitan perseroan dan rencana pemberhentian tersebut harus diberitahu kepada anggota Direksi yang bersangkutan. Pada praktiknya, keputusan sirkuler ini seringkali menimbulkan permasalahan terkait mekanisme yang kurang diatur secara rinci dalam peraturan perundang-undangan terlebih apabila berhubungan dengan kepailitan.
Effectiveness of the Implementation of Restitution Payment Decisions for Victims of Criminal Acts of Fraud Kusuma, Agung Jaya
Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah Vol 20, No 1 (2025): March 2025
Publisher : UNISSULA Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jhku.v20i1.43985

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the effectiveness and obstacles in the implementation of restitution payment decisions for victims of fraud in decision Number 343/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Bjm. This study uses a sociological legal approach method, analytical descriptive research specifications, the data used are primary data and secondary data. Data collection methods include field studies and literature studies, while the data analysis method is qualitative. The theories used in this study are the theory of legal effectiveness and the theory of legal certainty. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the implementation of restitution payment decisions for victims of fraud at the Banjarmasin District Attorney's Office in decision Number 343/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Bjm has not been effective. This is because it is constrained by the limitations of the law in regulating the technical implementation of restitution payments by the prosecutor's office, the convict's assets are insufficient to pay restitution, and difficulties in tracing assets. The solution to overcome these obstacles is that it is necessary to immediately create regulations related to technical guidelines for the prosecutor's office in managing the assets of convicts as restitution payments, the prosecutor's office coordinates with LPSK, KPKNL to hold FGD meetings with victims to reach an agreement, cooperation with the Financial Services Authority (OJK) or other related institutions to accelerate the asset identification process.