Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Literatus Vyavahara Duta
Sihaloho, Hasiholan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Kontrol Masyarakat terhadap Penegak Hukum pada Trend No Viral No Justice dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Sihaloho, Hasiholan; Sudarto, Sudarto
LITERATUS Vol 7 No 1 (2025): International Socio-Cultural Scientific Journal
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/lit.v7i1.1993

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technology has transformed social dynamics, particularly in law enforcement oversight in Indonesia. The phenomenon of "No Viral No Justice" illustrates how public participation through social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and TikTok can significantly influence legal processes. This study analyzes the role of social control exercised by society over law enforcement agencies within the "No Viral No Justice" trend, aiming to achieve justice. The research employs normative juridical methods, supported by case studies of several viral legal cases in Indonesia. The findings reveal that while public pressure through social media often compels authorities to respond promptly and transparently, this phenomenon also exposes weaknesses in conventional law enforcement systems. Some legal cases receive attention only after becoming viral, creating the risk of unequal legal treatment. Furthermore, challenges such as insufficient evidence, procedural delays, and external pressures complicate the pursuit of objective justice. The study concludes that although "No Viral No Justice" serves as an effective mechanism for accelerating law enforcement, it must be balanced with procedural fairness, accurate information dissemination, and judicial independence to prevent distortions of justice
Analisis Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 60/PUU-XXII/2024 Tentang Ambang Batas Pencalonan Kepala Daerah di Pilkada Tahun 2024 Menimbulkan Ketidakpastian Hukum Untuk Pilkada Berikutnya Sihaloho, Hasiholan
VYAVAHARA DUTA Vol 20 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Fakultas Dharma Duta Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25078/vyavaharaduta.v20i1.4629

Abstract

In response to the legal uncertainty arising from Constitutional Court Decision No. 60/PUU-XXII/2024 regarding the candidacy threshold for regional head elections (Pilkada), several strategic recommendations can be implemented to ensure a more transparent and fair electoral process. These include: (a) establishing clear procedural policies, (b) strengthening the role of the legislature (DPR) in lawmaking, (c) limiting the authority of the Constitutional Court, (d) promoting legal education and public awareness, (e) monitoring and evaluating the election process, and (f) conducting academic studies and research. In the context of the regional head candidacy threshold, regulations regarding this threshold should no longer be subject to change within 200 days before the opening of candidate registration by the General Election Commission (KPU). If this measure is not enforced, referring to Constitutional Court Decision No. 60/PUU-XXII/2024, which was issued seven days before the KPU accepted candidate registrations, the Constitutional Court could potentially amend the candidacy threshold regulations just one day before the KPU begins accepting candidate registrations in the 2029 Pilkada.
Co-Authors Sudarto Sudarto